By Debbie Schlussel
As readers will recall, when I met and interviewed Sylvester Stallone at the late 2006 Detroit premiere of “Rocky Balboa,” I asked him about the plot of “Rambo“–the final installment of the “Rambo” series. (It debuts Friday). He told me it was about Rambo rescuing missionaries from terrorism. I asked him if they were Islamic terrorists. No, he told me, they are Burmese terrorists.
Well, I just got back from a screening of “Rambo.” And while I’m prohibited from reviewing it until it comes out, this weekend, I do have this to say:
While I was watching over an hour of Asian men committing all kinds of bloody, graphic torture, rape of males and females, and murder against their own people and Americans, I thought to myself, can you imagine if the terrorists were Muslims?

I’m not saying the terrorists of Myanmar/Burma–the setting of this movie–don’t do these things to their people. They definitely do. But so do Muslim governments and Islamic terrorists, who set the bar. Yet, no-one in Hollywood will dare make such a movie depicting this, post-9/11. After all, we must respect the “real victims” of 9/11–the religion of the perpetrators.
As I mentioned this to a critic from one of Detroit’s major newspapers, he agreed, saying, “Yeah, they’d never make a movie like that. It would be very controversial.”
I guess the Council on American-Myanmar Relations hasn’t yet set up shop in America to whine, cajole, PC-ify, and sue the heck out of Hollywood.
I paraphrase George Orwell’s “Animal Farm” often on this site. But it is so true:
All of the animals in the barnyard are equal. But some are more equal than others.
Asians are acceptable terrorists on the silver screen. Muslims and Arabs? Whitewash City.
Stay tuned for my complete “Rambo” review on Friday. (Also, don’t forget my weekly Friday Morning movie reviews at approximately 10:35 a.m. on Sirius Patriot Channel 144 on “The Mike Church Show.”) Believe me, I have plenty more to say about this film.

By Debbie Schlussel
Okay, so they didn’t really make a new movie about it, but watching Monday Night’s Democratic Debate with Barack Hussein Obama answering a question about whether he agreed with author Toni Morrison’s claim that Bill Clinton was the first Black President, reminded me of my ideal Democratic campaign poster regarding this race on the Dems’ side of the aisle. As you probably know, Obama jokingly said he’d have to see Bill Clinton’s dancing abilities to judge whether he, inded, is a “Brother.”
I asked master artist David Lunde to redo the poster from the movie, “Undercover Brother,” with far more appropriate personalities. Many apologies for changing the sex of one of the candidates . . . Hillary. By the way, watch these clips from “Undercover Brother” (may be considered unsafe for workplace viewing), and you’ll see some resemblances to the first Cankles Administrations of 1993-2000. Billy Dee Williams plays a Colin Powell-esque General who, in his retirement, is pushing fried chicken instead of his usual Colt 45 drink.

Slick Willie In “Undercover Brother” By David Lunde
But the real Colin Powell was far smarter and vastly more unethical. He got his son, then sitting on the FCC, to approve a merger deal between AOL and Turner Broadcasting, so that he–Colin Powell–would make $20 Mill from his stock options. That’s what happened.
Seriously, not sure why any Black actor would agree to be in this movie. But I could see Bill Clinton in it.

By Debbie Schlussel
I hate when mindless celebs get involved in politics. That includes left-wing celebs (redundant) and the scant few “conservative” celebs (read my column on Ted Nugent). It includes Hollywood celebs and sports celebs. And it especially includes celebrated, calorically-gifted college basketball coaches.
Yes, I’m talking about new Hillary and Pro-Choice schlubby spokesmodel, Rick Majerus, head basketball coach at St. Louis University.. Reader Lawrence aptly calls him “the heralded
Clintonian Sage of the Hardwood”:

Rick Majerus, one of the game’s winningest coaches, made the comment at a weekend rally for the Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton. . . .
In an interview with KMOV-TV at Saturday’s Clinton rally in suburban St. Louis, Majerus identified himself as a Catholic and called himself pro-choice. The St. Louis University spokesman Clayton Berry said Majerus was at the rally as an individual, not as a representative of the college.

New Hillary & Pro-Choice Spokes-Schlub Rick Majerus
Kudos to St. Louis Archbishop Raymond Burke for asking Majerus’ Cathoic employer–St. Louis University is a Jesuit school–to discipline him:

“I’m concerned that a leader at a Catholic university made these comments,” Burke said by telephone as he attended March for Life anti-abortion events in Washington. “It can lead Catholics astray. I just believe that it’s of the essence for people to understand as a Catholic you just cannot hold these beliefs.”

Not sure how success at coaching college hoops translates into either sage Presidential endorsements or profound views on killing babies.
Hey, Coach Majerus: SHUT UP and coach.

By Debbie Schlussel
Yesterday, I wrote about President George W. Bush’s liberal judge, Marcia Cooke, who gave piddling sentences to three convicted terrorists, including Abdullah Al-Muhajir a/k/a Jose Padilla, after they were convicted by a jury. As I told you, Ms. Cooke went out of her way to issue sympathetic ruling after sympathetic ruling to Al-Muhajir/Padilla’s defense lawyers, and I sadly correctly predicted she’d go soft on him.
Well, it’s even more outrageous than I thought. Not only was she soft in sentencing the three terrorists, but she gave them LESS than the federally-mandated minimum sentence for the crimes for which they were convicted. And she made a statement at sentencing that she felt bad for the “inhumane” way this Islamic terrorist was treated by America and that she saw no evidence he and his defendants were terrorists because not one American was killed by them.

Judge Marcia Cooke Hearts Terrorist Padilla/Al-Muhajir
Um, hello . . .? If we would have caught Mohammed Atta before he got on that plane, would she say the same thing about him? Probably. No evidence? Yes, a lot of non-terrorists fill out Al-Qaeda job applications, right? (Al-Muhajir/Padilla’s application was part of the evidence presented in court).
Read this absurdity:

In deciding against life sentences for the three men — which prosecutors had sought — U.S. District Judge Marcia Cooke said no evidence linked them to acts of terrorism.
“There is no evidence that these defendants personally maimed, kidnapped or killed anyone in the United States or elsewhere,” she said.
Cooke also said she arrived at Padilla’s sentence after considering his long detention at a Navy brig in South Carolina.
“I do find that the conditions were so harsh for Mr. Padilla … they warrant consideration in the sentencing in this case,” the judge said.

Um, isn’t “I Feel Your Pain,” a Clinton sentiment? This woman is nauseating. Incredibly, many Bill Clinton appointees are far tougher. Today’s Wall Street Journal reports on how the judge significantly departed downward from the minimum sentence mandated by the federal sentencing guidelines, something that is usually reserved for cases in which the defendant helped the government with testimony or provided valuable information in another case, which Padilla and his defendants didn’t do. The WSJ gets the gender of the judge wrong (it’s a she, not a “he”) and doesn’t mention her sorry name (did the WSJ forget the first of the “five Ws” of reporting–“Who”?:

The sentence fell short of the life term prosecutors sought, and sentencing guidelines suggested a range of 30 years to life. The judge said her decision was intended, in part, to compensate for the “harsh conditions” Mr. Padilla, a U.S. citizen, endured during three years he was held without charge, as an “enemy combatant.”

Gimme a Break!
The government can appeal her downward departure from the sentencing guidelines, which federal judges are required to follow by law, but as the wimps that they are at DoJ, they won’t.
Desperate But Not Serious–America’s War on Terror. The terrorists are laughing at us.

By Debbie Schlussel
Sadly, yet another Schlussel prediction in the war on terror comes true.
Readers will recall that I warned you that Judge Marcia Cooke, a George W. Bush appointee, was a liberal and a former Detroit-area federal public defender. Readers will recall that I predicted Judge Cooke would be lenient on terrorist Abdullah Al-Muhajir Jose Padilla and his fellow terrorist co-defendants, including former Assistant Superintendent of Detroit Public Schools Kifah Wael Jayyousi (who had access to all of the infrastructure and water systems for the Detroit public schools and later the Washington, DC public schools). And lenient she was. Were it not for the jury, I have no doubt they would walk, as I had predicted they might.

Judge Marcia Cooke Soft on Terrorist Padilla/Al-Muhajir
And I was right. The feds asked for life in prison for Padilla, Jayyousi, and a third defendant, Adham Amin Hassoun. But, today, the judge, as I predicted, went soft. She gave Muhajir/Padilla just over 17 years in prison, Jayyousi just over 12 years, and Hassoun, just under 16 years. Fortunately, Judge Cooke did not let them walk, as I had feared could happen. But walk in a few years, they certainly will. All are eligible for a reduction in these sentences for good behavior. And Judge Cooke issued a number of rulings that made it easy on Padilla et al.
Thanks, Judge Cooke, your Dis-Honor. More evidence that America is like Adam Ant. Desperate But Not Serious in the domestic War on Terror.
Remember everyone saying the reason to elect and re-elect Bush was “for the judges”? Well, this is one of Bush’s judges.
GUH-REAT judicial appointment.
Also at fault–the U.S. government. They removed the “Enemy Combatant” status from Padilla, punting on that issue before Supreme Court review. They also whiffed on Padilla’s dirty bomb plot, not at all brought up in his criminal trial. This is typical of the Justice Department’s half-assed “pursuit” of terrorists. It is largely a failure.
Thankfully, these guy are in prison. But in a decade, they’ll be out again, plotting against America with their buddies they converted behind bars.
Remember that Padilla was a top Al-Qaeda official. His “job application” documented that. It is truly incredible to think that a guy the government said, not long ago, was plotting to smuggle a dirty bomb into our nation to kill Americans, will be out in less than two decades, while so many other Americans with far less serious crimes will serve decades longer.

By Debbie Schlussel
If you don’t feel old, some of the pop culture figures you grew up with certainly are getting there.
Among today’s celebrity birthdays are former Journey lead singer Steve Perry–59, today–and “The Exorcist” star, Linda Blair, 49.
Bring back old memories?

Birthday Sharers Steve Perry & Linda Blair Had Same Hairstyle

By Debbie Schlussel
For years before it joined the European Union, British conservatives warned their fellow countrymen to oppose its entry. Their clarion call proclaimed that Britain would lose its national sovereignty in the most Big Brother of ways. And they were right.
Meet Janet Devers, who runs a modest vegetable stall in a London market. At age 63, she is now facing 13 criminal charges for not selling her produce according to the measurements of the metric system.
No worries about the large population of extremist Muslims throughout England and especially in London. Who cares about the terrorist plots so many of them have tried to carry out there? The real prob in Britain–and throughout Europe is this poor woman who braves the cold and sells produce by the pound and ounce. The government actually came to her stall and seized her weighing scales:

Janet Devers: Non-Metric User is Britain’s Biggest Criminal

London’s East End is notorious for its criminals, from serial murderer Jack the Ripper to mobsters the Kray twins.
The latest candidate for this rogue’s gallery is Janet Devers, a 63-year-old woman who runs a vegetable stall at Ridley Road market. Her alleged crime: selling goods only by the pound and the ounce.
Ms. Devers, whose stall has been in the family for 60 years, faces 13 criminal charges stemming from not selling her produce by the kilogram and the gram. She stands accused of breaking a European Union-instigated rule that countries must use metric measures to standardize trade. The rest of Europe is metric.
But Brits drink their milk and beer by the pint. On the road they rack up miles. Imperial measurement “is what we know, how we are. Who’s to tell us to change?” said Scott Lomax, a fellow vegetable-stall owner.
Ms. Devers, who pleaded not guilty in a court appearance on Friday, is being lionized for her stand in Britain’s feisty tabloids. If convicted, she could be fined as much as $130,000.
“It’s disgusting,” said Ms. Devers of the charges. “We have knifings. We have killings,” she said. “And they’re taking me to court because I’m selling in pounds and ounces.”
And, equally illegally, in bowls. Ten of the counts against her relate to purveying produce, such as hot Scotch-bonnet peppers, by the bowl.
The United Kingdom wrote an exemption into its measurements law to meet the EU metric requirement in 2000, as Brussels allowed. It stated that traders must use metric weights, but they could use imperial measures as well. The problem is that Ms. Devers allegedly didn’t have metric prices on all of her produce when she was charged late last year, and two of her scales only measured in pounds and ounces.
The British imperial system dates back at least to medieval times. Notable holdouts still using it are Britain and the U.S. It doesn’t help that the metric system was created over 200 years ago across the Channel in France, England’s ancient archrival.
Aversion to the metric system is one of many signs of the U.K.’s lingering reluctance to integrate with its continental neighbors. Britain shuns the euro in favor of the pound sterling, drives on the left-hand side of the road and has a tradition of “euroskeptic” politicians who thrill some sections of the public by bashing the Continent. . . .
Insulated from the chilly January day in a faux-fur- trimmed hat, Ms. Devers chatted up customers from behind her covered stall piled with eggplant, ginger, green beans (1 British Pound a pound for the beans). Though her signs currently carry prices in pounds as well as the equivalent in kilograms, she said her customers prefer pounds — and sometimes complain when she uses kilos that she’s trying to cheat them.
“I always shop in pounds,” said Sophia Levicki, a 60-year-old part-time shop clerk and a regular at Ms. Devers’s stall. “If it’s good enough and cheap enough, I’ll buy it,” she added, as she asked for two pounds of shiny, purple-skinned eggplant.
Nearby stall owner Mr. Lomax added prices in kilos as well as pounds to his signs after warnings from local authorities in recent years. “The customers don’t understand kilos,” he said. Like many stall owners he uses metric scales, which he got after the EU metric directive was introduced into U.K. law in 2000.
Ms. Devers’s trouble with the law began one Thursday this September, when two representatives from the local government council, accompanied by two policemen, came up to her stall and seized her imperial scales. They told Ms. Devers she was using illegal scales and that she wasn’t allowed to weigh in pounds and ounces, she said. “I was furious,” said Ms. Devers, who asked the police officers if the council was allowed to do that, to which they responded that it was.
Around Christmas, a 67-page letter landed in her mail. It outlined 13 criminal charges against her, including one charge of improper pricing of goods and two charges related to using imperial scales. She also faces 10 counts related to selling by the bowl.
“I think it’s so ridiculous,” she said, noting that pricing per bowl is common practice because customers perceive it as good value. “If they’re going to do me for bowls, they have to do the whole country.”
Alan Laing, an official with the local authority that is prosecuting Ms. Devers, said that “making sure traders comply with weights-and-measures legislation is also part of the job.”
Ms. Devers wouldn’t be the first to be pounded down by the metric law. Four market-stall owners — including her brother — lost an appeal to the High Court in 2002 for not using metric measurements. They received conditional discharge — which means no further action is taken as long as they don’t break the law again within a specific period of time. A group campaigning to pardon them is helping coordinate financing for Ms. Devers’s case and calls them “metric martyrs.”
It’s about “who governs Britain,” says campaigner Neil Herron, from Sunderland, England. . . .
Ms. Devers faces fines of up to $10,000 per charge, or a total of about $130,000. “It would ruin me,” said Ms. Devers, who declined to detail her earnings. She says she canceled a planned trip to New York with her twin sister, because having a criminal record could make entering the U.S. difficult.

Beware the metric jihadis. Consider me a fellow member of Al Anti-Metricaeda.

By Debbie Schlussel
For years we’ve heard about the millions Dick Cheney was still getting as part of his payout from Halliburton. And I’ve written about the extensive Bush (and Clintonista) pay-offs from the United Arab Emirates, including Dubai–ie., Presidential loser bro Neil Bush’s hundreds of thousands in pay-offs from the seven-state Gulf confederation.
Well, now, we come to find out that Bill Clinton stands to make $20 million as profit from his partnership with anti-Semitic Dubai leader Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al-Maktoum. And we also learn that the former Prez has a scholarship program in Dubai, in which Jewish Israelis and Americans with Israeli stamps in their passports cannot participate (more on Dubai’s apartheid travel policy, here and here):

Friend of Bill/Hill: Slick Willie to Get Huge Payday
From Dubai Leader Mohammed Bin Rashid Al-Maktoum

Former President Clinton stands to reap around $20 million — and will sever a politically sensitive partnership tie to Dubai — by ending his high-profile business relationship with the investment firm of billionaire friend Ron Burkle. . . .
Mr. Clinton is also one of three owners of the global fund’s general partner. The others are Mr. Burkle, who is the managing member, and an entity connected to the ruler of Dubai, Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum. . . .
Mr. Clinton is also one of three owners of the global fund’s general partner. The others are Mr. Burkle, who is the managing member, and an entity connected to the ruler of Dubai, Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al-Maktoum. . . .
Under his arrangement with Yucaipa, Mr. Clinton has the right to opt out of a particular investment, according to people familiar with the matter. Mr. Clinton exercised that option in the Xinhua case — possibly out of concern that such an alliance could cause headaches for his wife’s presidential bid. Yucaipa invested about $25 million in the company.
In an October filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission concerning the Xinhua investment, Yucaipa disclosed that one member of its global fund’s general partnership was Dubai Investment Group (YGP) Ltd., which is connected to a much larger group of entities owned by Sheik Mohammed that has investments around the world.
Since leaving the White House, Mr. Clinton has had various contacts with Dubai. For example, Sheik Mohammed last year pledged financial support to a Clinton charitable initiative, and the former president’s foundation has a scholarship program at the American University in Dubai in cooperation with the emirate’s ruler.

Someone ought to ask wanna-be Prez, Mrs. Clinton, why her husband is helping prop up Dubai–which officially and openly participates in the Arab boycott of Israel and which officially and openly practices apartheid by banning Jewish Israeli citizens and everyone, including Americans, who has an Israeli stamp in his/her passport–with scholarships at their universities.
The Islamic world’s apartheid must end. But it never will if we continue to elect and honor Presidents and former Presidents–Republican and Democrat–who enable these states.
Oh, and the Emirates’ “little” involvement in the 9/11 hijackings and refusal to cooperate with investigators. No biggie, either, I presume.
We looked the other way and gave them not even a slap on the hand.

By Debbie Schlussel
**** UPDATE #2, 06/06/08: Full Schlussel review column on Adam Sandler’s High Quality Bin Laden Cinema. Allahu Conditioner. ****
**** UPDATE, 05/29/08: Review: Zohan is horrid. What HAMAS/Hezbollah couldn’t do to Israel and Israelis, Adam Sandler did. ****
Readers may remember last summer, when I told you about Adam Sandler’s upcoming movie, “You Don’t Mess with the Zohan,” in which Sandler plays a Mossad agent, “the Zohan,” who fakes his own death to realize his dream of becoming a hairdresser in New York. But he can’t escape his former life and faces off with Islamic terrorist nemeses in the Big Apple. A reader with an inside scoop tipped us off to some of the content of the film (see more about that, below).
Well, the movie comes out in early June, and here is the trailer, which is hilarious (and the formerly scrawny, newly-buff Sandler has definitely toned those bicep “pipes” for the part). I could watch this all day long, since like most Sandler movies where the premise is genius but the execution awful, it’s probably way more funny than the actual movie itself. And that includes the hilarity of Sandler’s very bad Israeli accent (here’s a tip: native Israelis–called “Sabras“–say “Sehrty Sree” for “33”). Plus no Israeli I know–and I know many–uses “make the bang boom” as an epithet for sex. (I know, I know–“it’s a comedy.”)

Still, I’m hoping the movie is better than Sandler’s usual fare and hasn’t been “Chuck and Larry“‘d to death. That’s because when my late father was very sick with cancer, last summer, I told him about “Zohan,” and I saw him laugh and cheer up for the only time in a very sad time. He told me he wanted to see it. I told him, “See, Dad, you have to stick around, so you can go see it with me.”
The movie was written by Judd Apatow–of frat-boy humor movie sucess–Sandler, and Robert Smigel (who I admit does have a great, bawdy sense of humor as “Triumph the Insult Comic Dog”).
More about the plot. As I wrote back in June, originally it was reported that when Agent Sandler discovers that the Manhattan salon at which he works is owned by his Palestinian terrorist nemesis, he is pressed back into action. Now, it appears from the trailer, that its actually a cab driver, played by Rob Schneider who heads a terror cell and works for Hezbollah (which, as you know, is Lebanese, not Palestinian).
Reader Andrew, who is acquainted with one of the actors in the movie, told us:

In a comedic side plot, Sandler’s character keeps giving a fellow hair-stylist tips on how to pick up women, not realizing that his coworker is gay. My colleague’s brother plays the gay coworker. [DS: The Filipino in the trailer.]

But as Israeli reader and blogger Esser Agaroth writes:

Hairdressers do VERY well financially here in Israel. I don’t hear a lot of people laughing at hairdressers here, straight or gay. They’re the ones who laugh,…all the way to the bank. It’s not so far-fetched of a premise for an Israeli to dream of being a hairdresser.

I hope the movie doesn’t end with a predictably peacenik, anti-War message, as has been the case with the last two fictional Mossad movies I’ve seen, “Munich” and “Walk on Water.” We shall see. I expect better from Sandler than from Abu Spielberg. But the “I’m tired of fighting” line in the trailer is, as my Dad wrote two years ago, the talk we keep hearing from the entire Israeli left-wing capitulation team:

In a speech before the left-leaning “Israel Policy Forum,” in July 2005, Olmert stated, “We are tired of fighting, tired of being courageous, tired of victories, tired of defeating our enemies.”
With a guy like this leading the charge, can Israel survive? Doubtful!

And if you are wondering about the Hebrew disco song in the background of the trailer, that’s the same story and hopefully not an omen for the movie’s content. Although Adam Sandler is very pro-Israel (he donated Sony Playstations to Israeli children in cities hit by Hezbollah during 2006’s war) and more politically in the center than most in Hollywood (he donated to Giuliani for Prez), his choice of soundtrack artists is decidedly to the left. The far left.
The song, “Hinei Ani Ba” [“Here I Come”] (video below) is by the schlocky but popular left-wing Israeli hip-hop group, “HaDag Nachash” [“The Fish Snake”] (Israel’s version of Jamiroquai) and is about being torn between Tel Aviv’s discos and nightlife and Jerusalem’s Western Wall of the Jewish Temple, etc. In the end, they stick with the left-wing, secular death of Israel and capital of Jewish self-hatred a/k/a Tel Aviv. Although that’s more charitable to what’s actually going on in Israel–today, the Tel Avivnik lefties never even make it to a dilemma and don’t hang in Jerusalem at all, though they do leave Tel Aviv to leave Israel. And they don’t come back.

Hopefullly, “HaDag Nachash”‘s most famous song–“Shirat HaSticker” [“The Sticker Song”]–is not in this movie. Written by David Grossman–the Noam Chomsky of Israel–it is an attack on religious Jews and all Israelis who oppose giving up land to terrorists and rolling over for dead, calling them “evil.” Another song of theirs shows father of modern Zionism, Theodor Herzl, doing drugs. I wonder if Sandler knows anything about this group.
If HaDag Nachash were running Israel, all Mossad agents would have to look for work as hairdressers in New York. So would the rest of Israel’s entire Jewish and Christian populations.
Too bad Sandler didn’t choose the work of right-wing Israeli rapper Subliminal a/k/a Ya’akov “Kobi” Shimoni, a son of Jewish refugees from Muslim countries, for the movie. His songs– very popular with the IDF–and his views reflect my views:

When we talk politics with Arabs in Israel, they say, “My grandfather used to live in Tel Aviv, and now it’s owned by Jewish people — we want to come back.” I respond, “My parents came from Iran and Tunisia, but nobody is going to give our property back to us. It’s all been confiscated . . . We have this little sandbox we call Israel. We give our hearts and lives to make it a proud country. Every one serves in the Israeli Defense Force in order for Israel to survive. You have half of the globe. What the f*ck do you want from us? Go live in Saudi Arabia.”
My mother is from Mashad, Iran, where every Jewish girl was married by the age of seven, because if a Muslim asked for the girl’s hand and you said no, they would kill you. In Tunisia, my father grew up with his family locking all the doors and windows whenever performing a Jewish ceremony — out of fear of attacks.

Is the comedic Adam Sandler the guy who finally breaks Hollywood’s post-9/11 taboo of making Muslims terrorists and Israelis the good guys?
I’m not holding my breath, but I’m “keeping hope alive,” Jesse Jackson fake earnestness-style. I expect the same ole, same ole.
Exit Question: Just how much did Paul Mitchell pay for the controversial product placement? Attention, Muslims: New product to add to your boycott list and “Death to all those who insult Islam” riots. Attention, Paul Mitchell execs: Can’t wait for the CAIR sensitivity training seminars for gay hairdressers and new line of halal shampoos (for use every other month).
Allahu Conditioner.

By Debbie Schlussel
Like I’ve said before, I really don’t care a whit about Britney Spears or her paramours. But, sadly, her Muslim boyfriend/reported fiance Adnan Ghalib–and the fact that he has a green card from an apparent sham marriage–brings to the forefront serious problems about our immigration policies and the authorities who “enforce” them. And I do care about that.
And Florida investigator Bill Warner has uncovered exclusive information about the mosque Ghalib’s family belongs to (his father is a trustee) that should make us wonder why this guy is in America at all.
Warner reports:

Adnan Ghalib, 35, (Britney’s boy toy) grew up in Small Heath, Birmingham, where his mum Saghar and dad Hussain Ghalib are strict Muslims who attend their local mosque daily, Hussain Ghalib is a trustee at the Central Jamai Masjid Ghamkol Sharif (Mosque) 150 Golden Hillock Road, Small Heath, Birmingham.

Central Jamai Masjid Ghamkol Sharif (Mosque)
According to Bill Warner, the mosque is known as an extremist Pakistani mosque, not far from another extremist mosque, the Finsbury Mosque, where the Shoe Bomber a/k/a Richard Reidand Zaccarias Moussaoui worshipped Allah. Bill also notes that :

Terror arrests have been made in the Small Heath area of Birmingham.
The first of the suspected 21 Julaty attackers to be held, Yassin Hassan Omar, was arrested in Heybarnes Road, in the Small Heath area of Birmingham, at 0430 BST on Wednesday.

Why doesn’t anyone in Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) ever look into this the way Bill Warner has? They don’t, and they won’t. And that’s the problem.
We don’t “discriminate against” a/k/a discern Muslims in our immigration process. We allow way too many in. And Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) adjudicators–the ones who decide who gets immigration benefits like green cards and certain visas–don’t even investigate which mosque someone belonged to or whether they are involved with extremists. As I’ve repeatedly reported, CIS adjudicators spend on average only SIX minutes per application, and that’s without adjusting downward for bathroom breaks and lunch. And as I reported, not too long ago, CIS adjudicators weren’t even allowed to check terrorism databases for citizenship applicants.
If only Bill Warner or former CIS Director of Security/whistleblower Mike Maxwell were running the show, we’d be safe. Instead, we are less safe.
A special thank-you-very-little to the “terrorism” President. This is happening on his watch. He’s done zilch to change it.
Adnan Ghalib is a sleazy photog out to scam a mentally-impaired pop star and that may be the limits of his harm to America. But who else has been allowed into the country? And what are their plans? Who else who attended this mosque and has extremist ideas and plans is here in our midst? How many of them–like Ghalib–have left their sham marriages now that they have a green card? And how many has ICE allowed to remain here because it looked the other way?
Would love to know who gave this dude a green card.
Our green card and citizenship granting policies remind me of a certain pop hit with which Ms. Spears should be familiar:
“Oops! I Did it Again.” Ditto for the very little that has changed in that arena since 9/11. It’s as if America is saying, “Hit Me, Baby, One More Time.”
Or a zillion more times.
***
While I don’t care about what the inane Britney Spears does, Bill disagrees, saying that he believes if she marries Ghalib, young girls who idolize her will also want Muslim boyfriends and hubbies. But I just don’t think she has that level of popularity and admiration, anymore.
Now, if Miley Cyrus got a Muslim boyfriend, I’d say it’s time to worry.