By Debbie Schlussel

Should a vagina be running the U.S. Secret Service? The performance of the first chick in charge of the agency indicates, um, no.

Last year, Hollywood put out two movies with the same plot involving terrorists getting into the White House–“Olympus Has Fallen” (read my review) and “White House Down” (read my review). In both of my reviews, I said, “that would never happen in real life.” Well, now, it has with two serious breaches of White House security, last week, one of which involved a man with a serrated knife who made it all the way to the White House doors without a sniper taking him down. What if he had been a homicide bomber and pressed the button or pulled the cord? It would all be over.

Remember, in 2012, when the U.S. Secret Service was caught in a prostitution scandal in Colombia? Remember how feminists and female political hacks said, “this would never happen if a woman was running the Secret Service”? Democrats AND Republicans blamed it on what they said was the Secret Service’s “male culture” (yeah, cuz we need more incompetent women doing the job like Obama is doing with the Marine infantry and Army Rangers!). Well, Barack Obama answered their gynecological-based prayers and put a woman in charge. He ushered out George W. Bush’s Secret Service Director, Mark J. Sullivan, and put someone with a vaginal canal in charge, Julia Pierson.

And look what happened with a chick in charge of the Secret Service. Serious breaches of security and very lackluster performance. The White House doesn’t just have the suited Secret Service agents you traditionally see in the movies wearing sunglasses and earpieces. It also has hundreds of uniformed Secret Service Police (who also guard foreign embassies). None of them reacted quickly to the breach either. The agency is also supposed to do threat assessment. With this guy, Omar Gonzalez, possessing a serrated knife, a machete, and 800 rounds of ammo, they didn’t really do a good job of threat assessing, did they?

Clearly, breasts and the past-tense ability to ovulate (and in this case, a past Billie Jean King coiffure, circa 1982) shouldn’t have been the key considerations when Obama picked his Secret Service chieftess. But, clearly, it was. How else do you account for the incompetence that’s been visited on the Secret Service’s most important and prominent mission, protecting the President (and the White House)? If feminists can practice sexism and blame the Secret Service prostitution scandal on a man in charge, then turnabout is not only fair play, but highly appropriate here. Read the rest of this entry »

By Debbie Schlussel

Two movies I liked among the new offerings in theaters today (I did not see “Tusk”–sorry):

* “The Guest“: I very much enjoyed this movie until almost the end when it devolves into a little silliness and anti-government baloney. The movie is almost a parody of 1980s and late 1970s thrillers, complete with a 1980s soundtrack and background music reminiscent of the movies of that era. The movie is ironic, funny, and very kitschy and campy (for instance, the family in the movie has the world’s biggest collection of Halloween pumpkins). British actor Dan Stevens (of “Downton Abbey” fame) does a great American accent as the mysterious star of the film.

The story: Stevens arrives at the home of a family grieving the death of their son/brother, a soldier in Iraq who was killed there. Stevens says he was in the son’s unit, and that the son wanted him to tell the family how much he loved them. So he came to town to tell them. They believe the story because Stevens is in the photo of the son’s unit in Iraq. Soon, Stevens has insinuated himself into the family, beating up the football players who terrorize the younger son, and helping the family in other ways. But mysterious things begin happening, and people are found dead. Can’t say more, but that I enjoyed the ride, until we find out who he is and why he is doing these things. I didn’t like that anti-government aspect of it. But I did like the ending. Read the rest of this entry »

By Debbie Schlussel

Barack Obama’s top official in charge of pressuring Israel to give in to HAMAS received nearly $15 million dollars from HAMAS’ top financier.

Martin Indyk (or as I’ve always liked to more appropriately call him, Martin (In)dick) was Obama’s and John Kerry’s top diplomat in charge of forcing Israel to “make peace” with HAMAS and the Palestinians and shove all kinds of concessions down Israel’s throat that would be the death of the Jewish State. But, for once, Binyamin Netanyahu, stood tough against him, and (In)dick resigned to return to liberal think tank, Brookings, where he is a top official. And in exchange for his service to HAMAS against Israel, (In)dick was given $14.8 million from Qatar, HAMAS’ top financier (and also ISIS’ top hostage ransom payer). The New York Times reported this (without, of course, noting Qatar’s role in HAMAS financing), and few noticed.

For those of you not familiar with Indyk, he is one of the many self-hating, anti-Israel Jews to come out of AIPAC–the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, otherwise fraudulently known as “the pro-Israel lobby.” Indyk has company in several fellow former AIPAC employees Wolf Blitzer (now at CNN) and M.J. Rosenberg (another friend of Obama and, until recently, a part of Media Matters) who once pretended to be supporters of Israel but are now cheerleaders for its Muslim enemies. He came to the U.S. as an immigrant from Australia. AIPAC helped him get the visa, and now this schmuck has U.S. citizenship. Indyk was born in England (thus, the extremely awful teeth). Read the rest of this entry »

By Debbie Schlussel

In the wake of the Ray Rice incident, feminists, Allstate Insurance, “Scandal” star Kerry Washington, and ABC News have created a new form of “male spousal abuse” . . . or rather a new, absurd term for women who don’t want to work: “financial abuse of women.” They say that the husband making all of the money is a “trap” that forces women to stay in a marriage. They say “financial abuse” is “domestic abuse” that leaves “invisible bruises.” Really?

Yes, they are saying that a husband making money while the wife refuses to work is the same as the husband, “slappin’ that bitch!” Yes, Allstate Insurance! I wonder if Allstate is gonna offer an insurance policy for that. How many invisible “financial bruises” does it take to get a payoff, and how will the adjuster figure out the amount of the claim? Is it “domestic violence” when the husband earns all the money and refuses to allow the wife to spend it on an expensive shopping spree? By Allstate’s definition, yes, it is. Read the rest of this entry »

By Debbie Schlussel

Muslims are demanding a tax-funded non-pork food shelf at a free food pantry for the poor–or an entire tax-funded halal food pantry (I’m not sure which)–in Minneapolisamoliastan. And the lesson is: give an inch, they take a mile.

Or to be more blunt, as V.I. Lenin once said to his minions: dig with bayonets, and if you find steel, retreat. But if you find mush, keep digging. Muslims keep finding that mush in spades: it’s called, “America” (and the rest of the West). Welcome to America!

We are constantly told by propagandists who massage and fake statistics, that Muslims are more well-educated, wealthy, and less likely to go on the public dole. We’re told the same about illegal aliens. None of that is true. In fact, Muslims and illegal aliens are very likely–highly likely!–to take advantage of dumb Western infidels’ charity and naive good nature and feed on the public trough. Go to Dearbornistan and see all the Mercedes and Hummer drivers who are on welfare, Medicaid, food stamps, and AFDC. And the ISIS/Al-Shabaab-supporting Muslims from Somalia who populate Minneapolistan are no different. Not only are they lining up to raid the free food pantry for the poor, but now they insist on Halal shelves with no pork because they can’t be bothered to read ingredients or actually learn how to read and understand English. Ah, the good graces of immigrants! Remember, this is the state from which two of the Muslim ISIS “American” shaheeds (martyrs) emanated.

Many in the Somali-American community say finding a food shelf that caters to their religious dietary restrictions is almost impossible. “Some food shelves are trying to meet the need, but some of them already got canned beans that have already been mixed with pork — and there is a literacy issue here,” said community activist Fartun Weli. Read the rest of this entry »

By Debbie Schlussel

When news broke on Friday evening about NFL player Adrian Peterson’s indictment for child abuse, I had an instant reaction to it: which of Peterson’s multiple kids he fathered out of wedlock will end up better in life as an adult–the several he abandoned (one of whom is dead) or the one he disciplined with spanking?

As I pointed out last year, Peterson has fathered many children with several different women, enough to populate more than an entire week of Maury Povich’s “Who’s the Daddy?” shows. Nobody knows how many kids Peterson actually fathered. I believe the latest count last year was seven kids with seven women. For all we know, that count may now be up to 13 kids with 17 different women. And as I pointed out last year, he did not even ever meet the kid he fathered who died at the hand’s of his babymama’s new boyfriend. I laughed at the fact that the the entire NFL and its cast of TV commentators sent condolences Peterson’s way last year when the kid died. And Peterson accepted their condolences pretending he was actually a father to this kid, when he was only a sperm donor and neglectful shoulda-been parent.

I think the kid Peterson actually disciplined is better off than the others he abandoned. Yes, the boy is barely in his life. The kid was visiting Peterson in Texas and lives in Minnesota. But at least Peterson is in his life somewhat and trying to show the kid how to behave (I think). We can’t say that for his other kids, some of whom he’s briefly seen and/or visited and others that he hasn’t. We know that kids without fathers in their lives have all the odds in favor of their becoming criminals, drug users, dropouts, unwed fathers, having sex at an early age, and otherwise ending up losers. They are a burden on society created by their slutty dads and moms who didn’t insist on marriage before childbirth, and we are the victims of what becomes of that. Read the rest of this entry »

By Debbie Schlussel

I had to travel out of town unexpectedly late last week, stayed overnight unexpectedly, and my hotel blocked this site as “Forbidden” (thanks, La Quinta Inn!), so I could not post my reviews while away. Upon my return, after driving over 600 miles in a day, I was worn out and couldn’t get my movie reviews up before the Jewish Sabbath. I also decided to take the weekend off to regroup and do other work. So, my apologies for the belated movie reviews. Believe me, if there were even one good movie, I’d have made it a point to put these up earlier. But better late than never. You can always hear my movie reviews first thing every Friday morning on “The Mike Church Show” on SiriusXM Patriot Channel 125 after 7:05 am Eastern and on “The Pat Campbell Show” on KFAQ 1170 AM Tulsa at 7:35 am Eastern. I do my movie reviews on both, as well as some discussion of current political issues and pop culture topics on both shows.

* “No Good Deed“: It’s funny how Black America is always yelling and screaming that Hollywood is racist, and, yet, when Blacks make their own movies, they are quite racist against their own, if this is any example. Produced by the movie’s stars, Idris Elba and Taraji P. Henson, the two Black male leads in this movie are typical racial stereotypes of Black men. One, Elba, is a crazed, obsessed criminal, who is also a convicted murderer and rapist. The other is a cheating, lying husband. Oh, and they are both fighting over a White chick, to the detriment of the Black wife/mother and her kids. Well, to every stereotype, there is a kernel of truth. Read the rest of this entry »

by Debbie Schlussel

Every year on the anniversary of 9/11, including today, I put up the three things every American needs to know and remember. And, so, it’s annoying that on the eve of what should be a solemn American day, Barack Obama told the nation that ISIS isn’t Islamic and used the perpetual, old line that “every religion has its extremists.” Um, sorry, Barack, but ISIS is very Islamic. As Islamic as a mosque and the koran. As Islamic as the Hadith, the word of mohammed that is as binding as the koran and commands Muslims to kill us. (In one of the Hadith, a tree tells a Muslim there is a Jew hiding behind it and commands the Muslim to kill the Jew).

And if there are “extremists” in every religion, where is the Catholic ISIS, the Baptist one, the Jewish one. Where’s the Christian HAMAS and Hezbollah and Martyrs Brigades? Why is there Islamic Jihad, but no group that proclaims itself Jewish Jihad or Hindu Jihad? No, Mr. President, every other religion does not have extremists like Islam. And Islam is extreme. The extremists are the dominant force, the mainstream.

By the way, before you read my three things to remember on 9/11, here are a few additional things you need to remember: remember the assorted hucksters, con artists, and phonies who’ve fraudulently turned 9/11 into their commercial brand and used it to fill their coffers (including Palestinian Muslim con artist Hanan Qahwaji Tudor a/k/a “Brigitte Gabriel”–whose entire “life story” is false (more to come), fake terrorist/genuine stalker Walid Shoebat (who told CNN he bombed an Israeli bank and told FOX News he didn’t–YouTube it and note he can’t even get his grifter stories straight), car loan fraud perpetrator Scamela Geller (who has two murders in her path, more than most Muslims), and assorted other malefactors). These 9/11 pimps are laughing at you all the way to the bank. Cha-ching!

And remember, as I’ve noted many times before, that the 9/11 attacks were the best public relations move ever by Muslims, who got America, its leaders, pop culture, and other American societal forces to bend over backward (and forward) for Islam, Muslims, their intolerance, and their regressive, backward ways. And got them to make American less safe than we were on 9/10/01.

And got our previous President to expend American lives and limbs to transfer Iraq from a Sunni Muslim dictator who hated us to Iranian-backed Shi’ite Muslim “liberal Democrats” who hate us and now want us to save them from ISIS which inhabited the void Bush (not Obama) created by taking Saddam out and putting in Hezbo Shi’ites. Our soldiers could not stay there forever, constantly being picked off–constantly giving their lives and limbs–to protect Shi’ite Muslims in power who excluded Sunnis, Christians, and others.

Remember also that 13 years later, Ground Zero is still not entirely rebuilt, and its most prominent “jewel” is a museum that whitewashes the whole incident (and, yet, Muslims still whine because we didn’t show pictures of the cast of “Beverly Hills 90210” as the perpetrators). So much for “showing them.” Nope, they showed us and continue to have the last laugh, as now we are cowering from ISIS and our President and the media are telling us The Islamic State is not Islamic (when it is very much so). The Arab nuclear Spring was begun by Bush with his push for “democratic elections” in Gaza, Iraq, and Lebanon, which as a result became HAMASastan, an Iranian-satellite-state-cum-ISIS/ISIL/IS, and Hezbollahstan–another Iranian satellite state. It was continued with Barack Obama’s pushes in Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, and Syria, using American pressure, support, money, weaponry, and CIA advisors. And now ISIS has filled the void created by these two men who spent American lives in the name of Muslim “democracy” as a reward for 19 Muslims mass-murdering 3,000 Americans. If we did this during World War II, the whole world would be saluting Hitler, Mussolini, and Tojo. You would be. I wouldn’t be here, as my grandparents were liberated from Bergen Belsen concentration camp.

I detest those who say today is “Patriots Day” or a “national day of service,” but won’t say why or who made today a day of solemn mourning as it should be for nearly 3,000 Americans who were mass-murdered on our soil. Those who say we should “remember” 9/11, but who skip over the part about WHO DID IT and WHO CELEBRATED IT, are not remembering it at all. The 9/11 attacks were not committed by ghosts or the invisible man. They were not perpetrated by Fijians or Samoans or the North Dakota Coven of Sexy Wiccans. And those same groups didn’t celebrate the attacks. Nope, it was one group, with 1.8 billion adherents worldwide that did both the mass murder and the celebrating afterword. If you won’t admit that, you aren’t remembering a thing. You’re in fantasyland (and not the kind with the 72 Helen Thomases). Yup, that same religion that isn’t protesting in the streets against ISIS the way they do when they daily rounded up 10,000 Muslims to march in support of HAMAS and Hezbollah in Detroit and Dearbornistan.

So here are the other main things you must remember on this and every 9/11 anniversary and every other day . . .

* REMEMBER WHO WAS MURDERED & DIED ON THAT DAY:

Nearly 3,000 innocent people targeted and murdered in cold blood because they were Americans. People like my cousin, Jon Schlissel, who heroically went back to his office to save someone who needed help getting out. The Muslims who died that day were collateral damage and not the target of the Muslims who perpetrated the attacks. Clearly, their deaths meant nothing to their fellow Muslims around the world, who cheered the attacks, passed out candy, danced in the streets, and let out their stupid hyena-like, “lalalalalalahs.” The deaths of these Muslims are important to them and the mainstream media only for politically correct public relations purposes. Read the rest of this entry »

By Debbie Schlussel

Is it just me . . . or are you also tired of hearing the avalanche of whining all over the mainstream media (including FOX News) about (former?) NFL player Ray Rice and how he should be tortured and then beheaded, Muslim ISIS-style, over one incident on a videotape?

Yes, I know, an NFL player beating a woman–shocking! Never ever happened before right? While nobody should excuse domestic violence, I wonder what people would say if a man spit on and then slapped another man, NFL player or not. Would the spitee (or is that spatee?) and slapee be unjustified in responding? Or is there a double standard for women–you know, the group that insists on “equality,” but actually means special treatment? I watched the video of Rice–actually it’s been forced upon me repeatedly in every single newscast I’ve seen . . . over and over and over again–and I saw a woman who spit on and slapped a man. Not that the man is justified in his over-exuberant response, but once a physical fight is started, that’s what usually happens. Does it make a difference if the instigator is a woman who has exchanged bodily fluids with the man she attacked? What if Michael Sam’s gay mafia prince boytoy had spit on and slapped him in an elevator? Would we even be having this absurd “national discussion”? The ISIS terrorists are laughing at us.

Yesterday at the gym, I punished myself and watched a bunch of annoying, whiny FOX News know-it-allettes including MTV refugee Kennedy (who was liberal when she was at MTV, but, hey, she can be whatever, so long as she’s on TV). This insipid show, “Outnumbered,” is “The View-opause” for brainless Republicans and retired, old White people just like ABC’s “The View-opause” is for brainless Democrats, Mr. Moms, and aging Black welfare queens. These pretentious, shrieking women were bitching about Rice and Goodell and calling for their heads. Harris Faulkner, a moron who is there because she is Black and looks good in Diahann Carroll’s stolen wig (circa 1966), was the loudest on this along with Kennedy. I wondered: where are these hypocritette women with regard to their FOX News colleague Shepard Smith (real name: David Shepard Smith), who deliberately drove a car into Maureen Walsh, whose parking spot he wanted in 2000 during the Gore v. Bush recount in Florida?

By day’s end, Walsh was released from Tallahassee Memorial Hospital with bruises on her knees and legs, police said. Smith, 36, was charged with aggravated battery with a motor vehicle, a felony, and was released on $10,000 bail from the Leon County Jail. Read the rest of this entry »

By Debbie Schlussel

Does your eBay purchase fund illegal aliens, jihad, or something else similarly nefarious? Sadly, I learned that one of my eBay purchases recently funded the aiding and abetting of illegal aliens, and I’m none too pleased.

Recently, I purchased a World War II bumper sticker on eBay. When I received it, the letter below accompanied the purchase. I’ve redacted the seller’s name and identifying information only because eBay has rules against outing people or using information you learn about them from buying and selling. And I don’t want to get kicked off eBay. I spent less than two bucks on the item, so it’s not like I helped illegal aliens all that much. But still, I’m miffed. Read the letter . . .

(The pics at the end are part of the letter.)

The man who sent this to me appears to be a retired old man who actually thinks he is doing some good in the world by using his eBay store to fund illegal aliens a/k/a “migrant farmworkers and families.” I doubt all of these “migrants” are actually farmworkers anyway. But I’m saddened to know that my money is going to aid and abet the continuing invasion and infiltration by illegal aliens into this country. Read the rest of this entry »