November 5, 2014, - 2:40 pm
Huge Victory for GOP is NO Victory for Conservatives: The Islamo-Pandering Amnesty GOP Candidates on My Ballot
I used to be so excited to go vote. But yesterday, I was more unexcited and less enthused than in any election I’ve ever voted in. It was depressing. And I was more dismayed by the absurd, baseless cheers of so many people who think they are conservatives over a Pyrrhic victory they think means something. I felt the same way the night Obama announced the assassination of Osama Bin Laden. I told people then to stop cheering because it doesn’t mean much. The same goes for yesterday’s election tally.
Follow Me on Twitter . . .
Make no mistake. While yesterday’s elections were a huge victory for the Republican Party, they were no victory at all for conservatives. No victory for secure borders advocates. No victory for those of us who see the tide of Islamic extremism growing like a cancer in America. And I saw that starkly on my ballot as I voted yesterday. I had “choices” of far-left liberal Democrats and Islamo-pandering, immigration amnesty Republicans In Name Only. It was a choice I refused to make. I threw away my votes largely to Libertarian candidates. And the choices I had yesterday–with Republicans willing to do anything for Muslim votes–is an experience you will have ultimately. It’s an experience that will spread throughout America and has already spread to places like New Jersey, where Chris ChrispieCreme blocked Homeland Security’s deportation of an admitted HAMAS terrorist and picked the HAMAS terrorist’s HAMASnik Muslim lawyer for a judgeship.
The only Republican I was proud to vote for on my Michigan ballot was Ruth Johnson, Michigan’s Secretary of State, who was thankfully re-elected. She is the only Republican officeholder in Michigan with any balls and any sense of conservatism. Whereas the two previous Republican Secretaries of State willingly gave out driver’s licenses to illegal aliens (to the point that illegal aliens drove here from all over the country to get them), Johnson put her foot down and said no. Then, when Muslim illegal aliens sued her and the Obama Justice Department warned her it would get involved and she would lose, she backed down. But only then. And she put up a fight.
I can’t say that for any of the other Republican officeholders on the ballot, the top two of whom–Gov. Rick Snyder and Attorney General Bill Schuette–have repeatedly held Muslim fundraisers with known Hezbollah agents. And Snyder, as I told you recently, refused to condemn HAMAS and Hezbollah and, instead, chose to speak at the convention of an unindicted co-conspirator in HAMAS terrorism, an organization which both the Bush AND Obama Justice Departments and a federal judge said funded HAMAS terrorism. Snyder, as I told you, went to Dearbornistan and told the Hezbollah and HAMAS extremists that they are a model for America and that we need more Muslim “refugees” (he used that word) to come to Michigan. We do? Schuette refused to respond to questions regarding why he hung out with, gladhanded, and took money from open supporters of HAMAS and Hezbollah. And he will be running for Governor in four years. Note also that he refused, despite his responsibility to do so, to defend Ruth Johnson in the Muslim illegal aliens lawsuit over the driver’s licenses.
Then, there was Terry Lynn Land, Michigan’s losing U.S. Senate candidate. She’s one of those former Republican Secretaries of State who eagerly granted driver’s licenses to illegal aliens. Even Detroit’s liberal ABC local affiliate’s news operation did a report on this and questioned her repeatedly on why she continued to give illegals the licenses. She balked, but kept doing it. Then, she ran on being against amnesty for illegal aliens in this U.S. Senate race. Really? Where were you when it counted? Helping out the illegal aliens. I’m glad she lost. Oh, and by the way, despite her campaign ads on TV, when asked whether or not she was for amnesty, she hemmed and hawed and never really answered, uttering instead the typical gobbledygook about securing the borders first. Yeah, that’s the ticket.
Even in the minor spots such as University of Michigan Regent I was served up an Islamo-pandering “Republican” in Ron Weiser, a Jew In Name Only and a multi-millionaire real estate magnate, as one of my two GOP choices. I voted only for Rob Steele, a mensch and a good, down-the-line, pro-Israel conservative, who came in first and was one of the few other bright spots on the ballot. Weiser, a former chairman of the Michigan GOP, told me he “didn’t care” that the John McCain Presidential campaign in Michigan had on its finance committee an open supporter and known agent of Hezbollah. “Oh, we don’t care about that,” he told me. Me: “What? You don’t care about supporters of Islamic terrorism on John McCain’s campaign when he keeps telling us we are in Iraq to fight the terrorists over there so we don’t have to fight them here? You don’t care about Islamic terrorism? About Hezbollah that murdered over 300 U.S. Marines and U.S. Embassy employees in Beirut?” Weiser didn’t respond to that but told me only that he cared about the Hezbollah supporter’s conviction for insurance fraud, which I also mentioned. That’s the kind of Republican that Michigan just elected to University of Michigan regent. Congrats.
These are the candidates I was given by the Republican Party. These are the kinds of candidates many of you in other places around America were given as “choices.” That’s because they’ve taken your votes for granted. They know you will continue to vote GOP because you won’t vote for liberal Democrats, so they do nothing to keep your votes. Instead, they chase after Muslim extremist votes, liberal single women’s votes, minorities’ votes (which is why they won’t get rid of affirmative action–instead they embrace it), and amnesty-supporting illegal alien votes. They chase after the hard-to-get “girls.” You are the easy girl who acts like a desperate, jilted girlfriend, begging to stay. Do you like being treated that way? I don’t. But I’m getting tired of throwing my vote away to Libertarians. It took everything I had not to vote for the liberal Democrats on my ballot (I voted for only one of them). I’d planned to vote for them, but my libertarian movie critic friend, Paul Arlon, saw me at Monday Night’s critics screening of “Interstellar” (stay tuned for my review), and convinced me to do the Libertarian Party vote again.
This is the last time, though. Next time, the GOP has to win my vote away from liberal Democrats I despise. Why? Because I’m tired of voting for liberals who wear a phony GOP label, when I can vote for the real thing. If the Republican Party doesn’t offer me anything different from the Democrats on the issues I care about, why should I give them my vote? My late father used to always criticize Jews for allowing Democrats to take their votes for granted. As he always said, our votes should be in play and both parties should fight for them, or we will never get what we want. And conservatives should have the same attitude. Our votes should be in play, and Republicans should be chasing for them instead of chasing minorities and liberal women and amnesty Hispanics. They shouldn’t be taking us for granted.
But on my ballot, there were a bevy of Republicans who took me for granted and chased after Muslims who openly support terrorist groups that murdered Americans. Any party that ignores me and chases after terrorism supporters won’t get my vote.
And they shouldn’t get your vote either . . . until they change. Otherwise, please tell me why there is a Republican Party.
As I said before the 2012 election, the Republicans today are like the Conservative Party in the UK. They are just liberals who aren’t as liberal as the Labor Party. If that’s the best you can get, you’re in dire straits. But if you keep voting Republican, that’s how it’s gonna be.
As I pointed out on Monday, Mitch McConman, who will be the Senate Majority leader, isn’t a conservative. He’s an Obama backslapper, who ran away from repealing ObamaCare even before yesterday’s election, saying it will take 60 votes to defeat ObamaCare (WRONG – it takes only 51). He supports amnesty for illegal aliens. And he’s a big spender who never cut a single tax. And that’s different from the Dems how?
Some moronic “conservatives” are cheering that all the winning GOP Senators-Elect ran on repealing ObamaCare. So what?! Do you really believe they will actually repeal it?
If you do, I have some land under the Islamo-pandering Michigan Republican Party headquarters to sell you.
By the way, to those who keep telling me this election was “historic,” come see me in two years and let me know what “history” was actually made. And how it was for the better for America.
And next election, don’t tell me that if I don’t vote for these Islamo-pandering, amnesty-pimping Republicans, I’m helping the liberals win.
With “Republican” candidates like this, the liberals have already won.
One other reason none of the Republican politicians will oppose affirmative action — their own kids benefit from legacy admissions, preference because of contributions made, preference because their kids are children of celebrities, etc.
There is a tacit alliance between the Blacks and the me-too conservatives; don’t upset the Black affirmative action applecart and the Blacks won’t upset the privileged Whites’ applecart.
The post was very well said. The only coherent analysis I’ve read. Although I did derive some pleasure from seeing the agony of a few liberals I know. It was fun to see how miserable they were.
The other encouraging thing is that the vote seemed to indicate that there are a lot of people in this country who would support real conservatism if the choice was put to them clearly by real political leaders. Not that I’m holding my breath waiting…
Little Al on November 5, 2014 at 3:03 pm