March 24, 2014, - 4:35 pm
Sharia Wills in UK Aren’t the Start; They Are the End Result; & We Have it HERE in US, Too
Over the weekend, many readers sent me the story about Great Britain legislating and encoding sharia wills into law. One reader told me, “This is where it starts.” Um, no, sadly, it all started long ago–both in the UK and here, with open borders and non-stop Muslim immigration and human baby factories parading as “women,” with multicultural appeasement, with political correctness, and so on. This is, unfortunately, neither the start nor the beginning. It is the end result Muslims have been waiting, reproducing, and loudly whining for. And it’s been long in the pipeline. It just took 9/11 for it to get off the ground–you know, rewarding the religion of hijackers and mass murderers, as stupid Westerners do as if it were some sort of sadomasochistic sexual addiction without a cure. If it is the “start” of anything, it is the beginning of the end.
And here’s a tip: the Islamic wills the Brits have legalized are really no different than many of the things that have happened here in America, including–as I reported last year–American federal courts allowing Arcapita, which used to be called First Islamic Investment Bank, to have a sharia-compliant bankruptcy, which is a total violation of the Establishment Clause and the constitutional separation between church and state (which apparently never apply to mosque and state). And, yet, Chris Christie and his ilk have never ever been taken to task for his comments that those of us concerned about the imposition of sharia on America are “crazies” (after he appointed a HAMAS judge). Just remember, as you read this, that we are only decades–maybe not even A decade–behind the UK in our bending over backward (and forward) for Muslims and Islam. Anything happening there either will or already has happened here.
Islamic law is to be effectively enshrined in the British legal system for the first time under guidelines for solicitors on drawing up “Sharia compliant” wills. Under ground-breaking guidance, produced by The Law Society, High Street solicitors will be able to write Islamic wills that deny women an equal share of inheritances and exclude unbelievers altogether. The documents, which would be recognised by Britain’s courts, will also prevent children born out of wedlock – and even those who have been adopted – from being counted as legitimate heirs.
Anyone married in a church, or in a civil ceremony, could be excluded from succession under Sharia principles, which recognise only Muslim weddings for inheritance purposes. Nicholas Fluck, president of The Law Society, said the guidance would promote “good practice” in applying Islamic principles in the British legal system. . . . It acknowledges the possibility of people having multiple marriages.
“The male heirs in most cases receive double the amount inherited by a female heir of the same class,” the guidance says. “Non-Muslims may not inherit at all, and only Muslim marriages are recognised. Similarly, a divorced spouse is no longer a Sharia heir, as the entitlement depends on a valid Muslim marriage existing at the date of death. This means you should amend or delete some standard will clauses.” It advises lawyers to draft special exclusions from the Wills Act 1837, which allows gifts to pass to the children of an heir who has died, because this is not recognised in Islamic law.
And just remember that if these wills–which treat women and non-Muslims as less than human–are legal, it’s not long before Islamic subjugation of and violence toward non-Muslims is legal also. After all, if women and non-Muslims are not worthy in the eyes of the law for the purpose of wills, they are not worthy for the purpose of anything else, either. Anyone with a modicum of logical thinking gets that . . . or should.
Sadly, people don’t get that. They are, instead, concerned about a missing Malaysian flight, the Kanye-Kim Vogue cover, Communists vs. neo-Nazis in the former Soviet Union, and a whole lot of other things that won’t affect them the way this imposition of Islam on the West will affect the future of the West.
You and I won’t see it come to the United Caliphates of America or the United Kingdom of Greater Arabiastan, but your grandchildren, great-grandchildren, or other emergent future generations will see it. There is no way a society, that claims to be Western but enshrines Islamic law as the law, can survive Islam. That’s just a stubborn fact.
Good-bye, Constitution. Hello, koran, holy book of the 9/11 hijackers, the Fort Hood massacre perpetrator, the shoe bomber, the undie bomber, the Times Square bomber, and every other destructive force in this world.
A society can be Western or Muslim. It cannot be both.
Sharia is the antithesis of any secular legal code. The idea of one legal code that is to be applied to all equally is effectively ruled out. Instead, one has a theocratic legal code being imposed in civil matters for the express benefit of one religious group.
Worry on March 24, 2014 at 5:12 pm