July 20, 2009, - 2:37 pm

More on Historic Apollo 11 Lunar Landing: A Reader Once in the Space Program Speaks Out

By Debbie Schlussel
In my commentary, Thursday, on the 40th anniversary of the launch of Apollo 11, which resulted in the first manned landing on the moon, I said we should go to Mars, or at the very least, go to the moon again. Interviewed yesterday in a rare appearance, astronauts Neil Armstrong–the first man on the moon, Buzz Aldrin–the second, and Michael Collins (all of them in their late seventies) said much of the same:

On the eve of the 40th anniversary of the first human moon landing, the astronauts on that storied mission . . . lamented that NASA is working to send humans not to Mars but back to the moon. . . .
Collins, 78, said he had gotten to be part of the Apollo 11 crew through “10% shrewd planning, 90% blind luck.” At the same time, he said, “sometimes I think I flew to the wrong place”–a reference to his belief that Mars is more interesting than the moon.

manonmoon.jpg

Man on the Moon: Neil Armstrong on July 20, 1969

Aldrin, 79, also called himself “lucky” and pushed Americans to set their sights on Mars rather than the moon. “America, do you still dream great dreams? Do you still believe in yourself? Are you ready for a great national challenge?” he asked.

Sadly, I’m not sure most Americans are able to answer that question in the affirmative. In those days, Americans of all ages aimed for the Heavens. Today, they’re just interested in “The Hills.”
Today included more from Aldrin:

The astronauts who earned their fame going to the moon now can’t agree on whether the USA should go back.
At NASA headquarters earlier today in Washington, D.C., Apollo 11 moonwalker Buzz Aldrin lit into his former Apollo colleagues for supporting NASA’s plan to return humans to the moon. Aldrin could not contain himself after listening to moonwalkers Eugene Cernan and Charlie Duke urge the United States to send astronauts back to the lunar surface.
The three were attending a reunion of Apollo crewmembers on the 40th anniversary of the first steps on the moon.
“America to Mars is what ought to be, not America back to the moon,” he insisted. He scoffed at Cernan and Duke’s proposal to practice for a Mars shot by setting up a lunar base where humans would live and conduct research.
“Why go to the most difficult place, the surface of the moon, to do that?” Aldrin said. “Why not do those at the space station?”
After his attack, Aldrin laid an apologetic hand on Duke’s arm and said, “Sorry.”
At the direction of former president George W. Bush, NASA began working to send crews to the moon about 2020. Those plans are now being reconsidered by the Obama administration.

Reader Dan Galyon worked in the Space Program. He has some very interesting comments about it and why we haven’t progressed in 40 years.

Debbie:
I was privileged to have my tiny part in the space program, and personally witnessed a superlative effort, that of a collection of the finest engineers and scientists in the world. When the program was brainlessly shut down, these people were literally cast out in the street. No wonder college graduates specialize in “Drama” and other essential major areas of study, instead of engineering, math and science.
The shut down of the space program resulted in the finest team of engineers and scientists the world has ever yet seen being literally cast out of their jobs and into the streets.
In a nutshell, the NASA was a wonderful administrative creation which managed the implementation of the space program’s march to land a man on the moon, as initiated by President Kennedy. The brains of the program were “OUR” German scientists, especially Dr. Werner Von Braun. Of course the brains of the Russian missile and space programs were “Their” German scientists, who embarrassed and shocked the world with the orbit of Sputnik. Of course, they were all former employees of the Third Reich.
The guys who got the job done were the wonderful engineers and scientists, many of them ex-military people (including my father), who, having completed military careers were retiring from the service and looking for second careers.
These folks were employed by all the major aero space contractors, who bid on the many jobs required to get the project under way, and used good old American innovation and know-how to overcome the unbelievable obstacles to the program.
In the summers of 1968 and 1969, I was able to work a summer job for one of the space sub contractors, Bendix Corporation, as the son of one of their employees. This was a flunkie job, suitable for a student level trainee, and I made copies, carried mail, lugged files around, etc. But, I got to meet many of these fine people, doing millions of tasks directly and indirectly resulting in the successful launch of Apollo 11. I watched the launch from the closest unprotected positions accessible by employees, and it remains one of the great thrills of my life. You could feel the ripping concussion from the Saturn V, literally shaking the ground, and the atmosphere.
I can tell you that everywhere I went and everyone I met, the place, Cape Kennedy facilities, and the Kennedy Space Center, fairly crackled with energy, dedication, determination. It was the greatest collection of engineering talent in history.
Suddenly, after the fantastic rescue of the Apollo 13 crew, the Apollo program began to wind down, long before any public announcement surfaced. My father, concerned that the Bendix Corp. contract was closing down, retired early. I was in college, and as a typical student, failed to pay much attention to political news, but my recollection is that the Johnson administration was more concerned with creating an ever more wonderful welfare state than continuing one of the greatest endeavors in history.
Suddenly, it was OVER! I went home on summer vacation, and all the many high tech subcontractors were laying off the very engineers and scientists who had made it all possible. These people were literally working at gas stations or mowing grass, trying to keep from losing their homes, and finally, just trying to provide for their families. The prosperity and stability of Brevard County flattened like an empty paper bag. Thousands of people lost their homes, as the real estate market virtually collapsed.
There simply were not enough engineering jobs remaining to provide jobs for all the people seeking work. It was probably the greatest waste of talent in history, there is no telling what these people could have accomplished, had there been the leadership to direct them.
A couple years ago, I was sitting through the graduation of my son who, following in my footsteps, completed his BA at Florida State University. This interminable ceremony consisted mostly of degrees awarded in the field of “Drama” with relatively few engineers, mathematicians, chemists, physicists, or other “hard” scientists.
I guess if the nation can afford to cast the smart guys to the winds, there’s no reason for a student to work hard to get a degree, he or she can get a degree in Drama to help solve the big problems of history. . .
Debbie, I hope this account helps, best wishes to you, keep on telling the truth, our nation is being smothered by liars. Thanks for what you do!
Dan Galyon

And thank, Dan, for giving us an inside view, even if you were only briefly on the inside, this is yet more of the same insight as to how government bureaucracies always ruin a good thing.
Does America have the guts and the vision to overcome the bureaucratic obstacles and mindlessness that Dan Galyon described and achieve Buzz Aldrin’s vision?
Right now, sadly, I don’t think we have it in us. For a brilliant documentary on the first lunar landing and the subsequent ones, rent or buy, “In the Shadow of the Moon” (read my review).

manonmoon2.jpg






11 Responses

I agree with Mr Galyon 100%. As I had a cousin who worked for Grumman and he built the lunar module and the shuttle wings. They had a can do spirit which is not found today.
The first problem was by Apollo 17 we were getting real good at staying on the moon. The last crew of Cernan and Schmidtt stayed for three days. If we just continued on we would of had bases and maybe a small city by now. Instead the powers that be which were Nixon felt the need to cut Apollo 18-20. He wanted to save money and he felt a space truck or shuttle was the way to go.
We had many trained engineers and scientists who lost their jobs just as we will when the shuttle is retired. That is why it is imperative for Obama to commit to return to the moon to stay.
He talks about education but as Dan said if you go into a science you need a job at the other end. So the current plan needs to be followed through to inspire as well as employ Americans.
What is not needed is Bill Gates clamoring for more H1B visas for foreign engineers. After all without any space program there will be plenty of unemployed or underemployed Americans. If Gates takes some of his money he could help America, the country that helped him get rich.

spaceship22 on July 20, 2009 at 5:54 pm

*Does America have the guts and the vision to overcome the bureaucratic obstacles and mindlessness that Dan Galyon described and achieve Buzz Aldrin’s vision?*
I really doubt it. With all the multicultural hiring for NASA and the multicultural “science” textbooks used in schools today that downplay America’s achievements, most likely the people working at NASA have no vision and no desire to boost America’s prestige. Many of those working there probably do not even think of themselves as Americans.
Here is a perfect example of the type of employees NASA hires: Suleiman Baraka who came over from Gaza last year and evidently was immediately hired by NASA: http://collegiatetimes.com/stories/12891

Gabe on July 20, 2009 at 6:46 pm

“Suddenly, after the fantastic rescue of the Apollo 13 crew, the Apollo program began to wind down, long before any public announcement surfaced. My father, concerned that the Bendix Corp. contract was closing down, retired early. I was in college, and as a typical student, failed to pay much attention to political news, but my recollection is that the Johnson administration was more concerned with creating an ever more wonderful welfare state than continuing one of the greatest endeavors in history.”
Dan was not paying attention. He’s right about Johnson attempting to create a welfare state. But, Johnson was only president during two successful manned Apollo mission (7&8). Nixon was president during Apollo launches 9 – 17, and Skylab 2-4. Ford was president for the Apollo-Soyuz mission.

rbb on July 20, 2009 at 7:21 pm

I still dissent. I do not see the ability to do the whole thing (return the astronauts to Earth). I realize that that was said about the moon at one time–but this is exponentially more difficult by several degrees.
I read what Dan Galyon says about the Saturn rocket that propelled Apollo a quarter million miles to the moon–yes I know that once you are out of the atmosphere and the main gravitational pull of the earth it gets easier to go really fast–and absent gravity and friction resistance you only need to get aimed right and calculate properly.
But, how does a module land on Mars–50M to 140M miles away (so at least 150+ times further away), depending on when we send it, based on Mars’ orbit position in relation to the Earth–so literally months to get there, and colder than than Antarctica BTW). We land, and do what? OK so we go for a walk and plant a flag?
OK, OK, but THEN how do we then have the rocket power to return to the men to earth–is there some kind of fuel that doesn’t require all this massive launch pad and gear to launch it back the 50-140M milles, like it does from Earth? Why hasn’t it been tried on any other rocket launch? The moon is close (relatively) and very light gravity compared to Mars. Someone tell me, please? Point me somewhere where we can get some science facts on this, not just fanciful wind.

BB on July 20, 2009 at 10:26 pm

Aldrin has it right. If NASA doesn’t aim for Mars, it may not make it back to the moon.
Aldrin is underappreciated hero. He was the man who worked out how to perform real work during a spacewalk during the Gemini missions. Aldrin even devised many of the exotic tools still used by astronauts today.
chsw

chsw on July 20, 2009 at 10:55 pm

Building a permanent base on the moon is needed for the next step: a manned expedition to Mars. The US space program has a lack of direction and an imaginative goal. It is time to do the impossible… again!

NormanF on July 21, 2009 at 12:36 am

NormanF
In BB, you are dealing with a peasant mindset. This is what one would have heard about the voyages of Prince Henry the Navigator and Christopher Columbus from a serf. Both men, and especially the latter, did what seemed to be the impossible during their day. Such people paved the way for the colonization of the New World and also put Western Civilization into high gear. One’s existence was no longer circumscribed to the land or a small craft guild in a town. The Age of Exploration did more to shatter feudalism and its static mindset than the Black Plague. If none of that had happened, BB would have spent most of his life tending his lord’s fields or performing a craft in a small town. By 40, he would most likely have been dead, and his wife would have met her demise a decade earlier at best. If a famine or war occurred during this span of time, he life would have been even shorter and more miserable. It must be remembered that the Earth is not going to last forever. Its resources are finite and the temperate life supporring environment(with or without climate change) is temporary. Unless we or other countries take some affirmative steps, the future will see ever greater penury and eventual extinction. India, China, Japan, the European Union, and many other countries realize this, but do not have the resources to pursue this objective by themselves. The United States could lead in space exploration, but effectively chooses not to. We swallow trillions of dollars of new debt, but cannot bring ourselves to boost NASA’s pathetic budget of around $17 billion to a level that is not simply embarassing. People might claim that NASA is too expensive, but it only consumes less that one percent of the U.S. Federal Budget at this time. Congress consumes more in almost always needless earmarks that what is allocated to NASA on an annual basis.

Worry01 on July 21, 2009 at 8:52 am

“… and parrots don’t fly very well. Parrots also don’t tell you the truth, they only tell you what they are told.” – Neil Armstrong on all his fellow Apollo astronauts. In a 1994 White House Clinton arranged photo op. He was incredibly nervous and upset as he spoke”
…He later turned to the students in the photo op and continued, “There are wonders beyond belief on the moon for those who can remove truth’s protective layers”
There was a reason why all blueprints, tools, etc related to the manufacture of the Saturn V were confiscated by the FBI and destroyed, and a reason why the Russians took sledge hammers to their equipment. And that reason was not to save money or any other such thing. That reason- by their actions, what ever it was, involved fear.
The logical thing would have been for the Russians to take up were we left off. A lot of Soviet propaganda to be made – but they did not, instead slipping quietly into obscurity and a defening silence on manned lunar exploration.

PIF on July 21, 2009 at 9:44 am

I’ve found the answer!
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,245439,00.html
We can go anywhere without big rockets now!

BB on July 21, 2009 at 10:12 am

You’re not too far off about the youth being more interested in “The Hills” than this; if it’s not presented and marketed,on TV and magazines,as an exciting new pop culture trend, they’re not interested.

OldSchoolW on July 21, 2009 at 11:03 am

I attended the Sunday night event at the Smithsonian. The 3 astronauts and John Glenn looked and sounded healthy and hardy.
The speeches were geared to a general audience…no funny stories about the mission, etc. Mike Collins was his usual lovable self.
Aldrin was a Mars evangelist and shouted three times at the audience “YES WE CAN!” Very disturbing.

49smudge on July 21, 2009 at 11:59 am

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field