From what I know of forensic science any hair from a person’s body can be used to test for drugs, i.e. eyebrows. I didn’t mention any other southern region because we are all painfully awear of Britney’s personal grooming habbits.
YES, BUT THE LONGER THE HAIR, THE MORE DRUG USE HISTORY THERE IS. AND SHE HAD ABOUT SIX INCHES OR MORE OF HER OWN HAIR ATOP HER HEAD, PRE-SHAVE.
DEBBIE SCHLUSSEL

OneIrishJew on February 22, 2007 at 11:56 am

I read somewhere that she had extensions in her hair. If they were crafted out of human hair wouldn’t that give the possibility of a “false negative”?
Wait a sec… Why do I care???

MarySJ on February 22, 2007 at 5:13 pm

BS is a sad story of BS.

BB on February 22, 2007 at 11:23 pm

I’m not a cop but they would have a tough time proving it was her hair. There is no documented chain of custody.

Gorgar on February 23, 2007 at 8:01 am

I heard she paid a visit to the rehab 3 times. She is propably going to end up like Anne Nicole Smith like most Hollywood junky sluts…….in a casket. My hear bleeds out to poor Britney baby, a victim of her own self-destruction. So much for setting a great example for 12 year old girls. Going from a stipper to a skinner is some heck of a transformation, its actually quite laughable.

Jew Chick on February 23, 2007 at 11:07 am

would hair provide DNA to prove ownership, as well as past drug use?

Dr.Dale on February 23, 2007 at 1:51 pm