By Debbie Schlussel
Every time I think the hags on ABC’s annoying anti-male yenta-fest, “The View”, can’t get any more absurd, I’m disproven.
Yesterday, Baba Wawa was upset that Sarah Palin’s baby was at the VP debate on Thursday Night.
Today, she asserted a fictional “statute of limitations” on Barack Hussein Obama’s association with terrorists, like William Ayers, who attacked the Pentagon and tried to attack the U.S. Capitol Building.
As a lawyer, I certainly don’t claim to know all of the statutes of limitation. But I never got the memo from the Federal Election Commission and Free Speech Limitation Joint Task Force that John McCain is not allowed to point out the Obama-Ayers alliance because of a “statute of limitations.”

Hags In The Tank
The quadra-headed hag-rectangle of aging “View” skankdom–Baba Wawa, Whoopi Goldberg, Joy Behar, and Sherri Shepherd–all claimed that the past is irrelevant and that it’s not important that Obama associated with this anti-American terrorist.
As I heard this verbal exercise in the absurd I wondered two things:
1) If a future Presidential candidate was friends with Mohammed Atta or Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, will we say it’s “irrelevant” and that “there’s a statute of limitations”? There should never be a “statute of limitations” on these things. But it’s shaping up that way.
2) Didn’t I hear Joe Biden saying, “The past is prologue”, in debating Sarah Palin about the Bush past and trying to transpose it on McCain?
I guess the past is only prologue for Republicans and conservatives. But not for Democrats and liberals with terrorist buddies and a scary past who want to occupy 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
Oh, and “The View” hags provided another example of their double standard for statutes of limitations. Unfunny comedienne Sherri Shepherd said that John McCain’s cheating on his first wife is far more relevant and important than Barack Hussein Obama’s tight friendship with a terrorist who targeted America.
Like I said yesterday about “The View” hags: Priorities, Schmiorities.
As usual, faux-conservative/genuine-airhead Elisabeth Hasselbeck failed to point these things out or apply any sort of solid defense. Sean Hannity’s talking points can’t do it all.
That’s why she’s on the show. Stay pretty and remain foolish.