July 1, 2011, - 6:36 am
Told Ya!: DSK Muslim Rape Accuser Did Immigration Fraud, $100K Money Laundering for Drug Dealer Lover; Case Crumbles
The rape allegations made by a devout Muslim immigrant against former IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn a/k/a “DSK” are unraveling for EXACTLY the reason I cited when I originally wrote about this woman . . . and then got attacked by liberals for doing so. I questioned whether the woman really deserved or needed asylum and noted that like many others seeking asylum in Immigration Court, she probably lied. And guess what? I was right. She lied about rape before and made up claims she was subject to female genital mutilation. Not only that, but she’s involved in Muslim money laundering and drug dealing. Sooooo par for the halal course. This “poor, hard-working maid” we were supposed to feel sorry for is a con-artist who laundered $100,000 through her bank accounts for her drug dealer lover. I told you back when this case was headline news that things were not as they seemed. And that was the understatement of the year. I also questioned why the alleged victim had HIV or AIDS if she was so “modest” (she lives in federal housing for the HIV and AIDS afflicted). I now believe she probably got it from her drug dealer lover or some other fellow low-life she slept with.
Devout Muslim Accuser of DSK is Liar, Immigration Fraud Perpetrator, Money Launderer for National Drug Dealer
Now, let’s see if the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Obama Justice Department have the guts to seek to strip this liar of her citizenship based on her phony asylum claim and deport her for this blatant immigration fraud and false police report. Don’t hold your breath. Here’s the scoop on this hijab-wearing malefactor and fraud:
The sexual assault case against Dominique Strauss-Kahn is on the verge of collapse as investigators have uncovered major holes in the credibility of the housekeeper who charged that he attacked her in his Manhattan hotel suite in May, according to two well-placed law enforcement officials. . . . Prosecutors now do not believe much of what the accuser has told them about the circumstances or about herself.
Since her initial allegation on May 14, the accuser has repeatedly lied, one of the law enforcement officials said.
Senior prosecutors met with lawyers for Mr. Strauss-Kahn on Thursday and provided details about their findings, and the parties are discussing whether to dismiss the felony charges. Among the discoveries, one of the officials said, are issues involving the asylum application of the 32-year-old housekeeper, who is Guinean, and possible links to people involved in criminal activities, including drug dealing and money laundering.
Yup, the “devout Muslim” in a hijab was sleeping with a jailed, convicted money laundering drug dealer. Hey, yet another example of “Islamic modesty!”
Prosecutors from the office of the Manhattan district attorney, Cyrus R. Vance Jr., who initially were emphatic about the strength of the case and the account of the victim, plan to tell the judge on Friday that they “have problems with the case” based on what their investigators have discovered, and will disclose more of their findings to the defense. . . .
According to the two officials, the woman had a phone conversation with an incarcerated man within a day of her encounter with Mr. Strauss-Kahn in which she discussed the possible benefits of pursuing the charges against him. The conversation was recorded.
That man, the investigators learned, had been arrested on charges of possessing 400 pounds of marijuana. He is among a number of individuals who made multiple cash deposits, totaling around $100,000, into the woman’s bank account over the last two years. The deposits were made in Arizona, Georgia, New York and Pennsylvania.
The investigators also learned that she was paying hundreds of dollars every month in phone charges to five companies. The woman had insisted she had only one phone and said she knew nothing about the deposits except that they were made by a man she described as her fiancé and his friends.
In addition, one of the officials said, she told investigators that her application for asylum included mention of a previous rape, but there was no such account in the application. She also told them that she had been subjected to genital mutilation, but her account to the investigators differed from what was contained in the asylum application. . . .
Prosecutors had sought the restrictive conditions in part by arguing that the case against Mr. Strauss-Kahn was a strong one, citing a number of factors, including the credibility of his accuser, with one prosecutor saying her story was “compelling and unwavering.”
In the weeks after making her accusations, the woman, who arrived in the United States from Guinea in 2002, was described by relatives and friends as an unassuming and hard-working immigrant with a teenage daughter. She had no criminal record, and had been a housekeeper at the Sofitel for a few years, they said.
Mr. Strauss-Kahn was such a pariah in the initial days after the arrest that neighbors of an Upper East Side apartment building objected when he and his wife tried to rent a unit there.
Yup, because the rich liberals who populate the Upper East Side (and who mostly voted for Obama) always take the side of a Muslim alien fraud who cries “wolf” over rape. Let this be a lesson.
Tags: accuser, AIDS, Alien, asylum, asylum fraud, bank account, case, case crumbles, charges, con artist, Criminal, criminal activities, Cyrus R. Vance Jr., devout Muslim, DHS, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, drug dealer, DSK, female genital mutilation, fiance, five companies, Fraud, genital mutilation, Guinea, hijab, HIV, ICE, IMF, Immigration, Immigration Fraud, Islam, islamic "modesty", liar, lied on asylum application, lover, maid, Manhattan, marijuana, money laundering, Muslim, New York, New York City, not credible, prison, rape, rape victim, sexual assault, Sofitel, Strauss-Kahn, Upper East Side
There had been speculations I’ve heard that one motive among many for bringing down DSK with this phony “rape” charge was anti-Semitism, due to his being Jewish. Yet I have to concur that Obama’s so-called “Justice” Department (read: Vengeance, Retribution, Payback and Settling Old Scores Department) will not press any charges against this rape accuser. Especially given the Obama gang’s officially getting in bed with the Muslim Brotherhood.
ConcernedPatriot on July 1, 2011 at 6:53 am