Jodie gooed, “My beautiful CydneyÖ”
(Reflex to hurl. Stop.)
Cydney looks like she could be Jodiís mother.
And there isnít anything beautiful about that old hag.
Jodi youíre a hurtiní unitÖ
Pity Jodieís unsuspecting kids that will be raised by these two ______ of nature. Kids can be cruel and all the social engineering in the world will never change that.
Buckle up kids; Mommyís happy, but youíll never be~

The Canadien on December 12, 2007 at 2:00 pm

“guarding her private life fiercely for 15 years”… until lesbians became the trendy new Hollywood fashion statement. Jodie Foster: Just another pile of excrement we’re better off not stepping in. If you pay to see her movies, you deserve her.

spiffo on December 12, 2007 at 2:37 pm

NOOOOOOOOOOOOO! What is this world coming to? I never saw this one coming.

Ford Jones on December 12, 2007 at 3:15 pm

“Pity Jodieís unsuspecting kids that will be raised by these two ______ of nature.”
Oh, so Lesbians are ‘freaks of nature’ are they?
So rampant homophobia then. Yet another way in which you are exactly like the Islamic fundamentalists you claim to hate, Canadien.

No Pasaran! on December 12, 2007 at 4:13 pm

I love that term homophobia. Fear of a group whose only unifying quality is their common sexual depravity. Guess what not wanting to associate with people who behave in a trashy manner is not a phobia, it is called being selective. Just like I choose not to associate with people who bang everything that moves. Is that rampant whoreaphobia? You can slap all the -phobia titles that you want to on people. Just because you come up with a clever title, doesn’t make it reality.

Ford Jones on December 12, 2007 at 4:30 pm

I RARELY COMMENT ON TWO OF DEBBIES ARTICLES IN THE SAME DAY, BUT, I DID KNOW THAT JODY WAS A LESBIAN–NEVER CARED, I REALLY THINK SHE IS TALENTED. WHAT I DIDN’T KNOW AND PROBABLY SHOULD HAVE IS THAT SHE IS ONE OF THE “AMERICA HATING LIBS” THAT I SO DESPISE. THAT’S WHAT MADE THIS A SAD DAY FOR ME. MAYBE I DIDN’T WANT TO KNOW?

JoeBoy on December 12, 2007 at 7:08 pm

Jodie Foster is highly intelligent but she is not talented. She was precocious as a child actress. As an adult she’s a bore. She plays the same character over and over and over. I find her unwatchable–kind of like Meryl Streep and Julia Roberts. Yeeccchh.
Cyndy is a bull dyke. Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

lexi on December 12, 2007 at 9:15 pm

Posted by: No Pasaran!
Oh, so Lesbians are ‘freaks of nature’ are they?
Actually they meet the classical as well as the medical definition of “Freaks of Nature” despite your protestations that the Canadien is guilty of a phobia.
You can add me to the list that believe Lesbians are a Freaks of Nature.
When I attended College, Homosexuality was still in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) listed as The DSM-II listed homosexuality as “an abnormal behavior under section 302. Sexual Deviations”.
Section 302 said, in part: “This category is for individuals whose sexual interests are directed primarily toward objects other than people of the opposite sex, toward sexual acts,performed under bizarre circumstances. Even though many find their practices distasteful, they remain unable to substitute normal sexual behavior for them.” Homosexuality was listed as the first sexual deviation under 302

ScottyDog on December 12, 2007 at 10:17 pm

I think you are right lexi. I had to run a few of her movies through my head and would have to agree. She is somewhat unwatchable like Streep and Roberts. I guess I always had admired her intelligence and not her talent. However I do not consider her a “freak of nature” or a “pile of excrement”. I just don’t get that “hate America” thing. I wonder her career would be today if she were born in the Islamic sandbox.

JoeBoy on December 12, 2007 at 11:53 pm

ScottyDog posted:
[Actually they meet the classical as well as the medical definition of “Freaks of Nature” despite your protestations that the Canadien is guilty of a phobia.]
Canadien is a stupid Neanderthal.
[You can add me to the list that believe Lesbians are a Freaks of Nature.]
“The children is learning”, ScottyDog? You’ve also just added yourself to the ‘Stupid Neanderthal’ list.

Norman Blitzer on December 13, 2007 at 1:01 am

Hey Norman
I am proud to be on any ‘Stupid Neanderthal’ list that you have compiled and will wear it as a badge of honor.
It is pathetic how the Gay Lobby in this country has thoroughly brain washed people in less than 30 years with absolutely no scientific evidence needed to accomplish the task.
Abby Normal=Healthy
Kinsey would be proud of you.
BTW-Next on the Agenda is making Pedophilia Socially Acceptable.

ScottyDog on December 13, 2007 at 3:36 am

Scotty, in what possible way does the fact that homosexuality was classed as ‘a mental disorder’ when you were at college 60 years ago, justify your statement that “they meet the classical as well as the medical definition of Freaks of Nature” ?
And while we are at it, what is the ‘classical definition’ of a freak of nature?

No Pasaran! on December 13, 2007 at 8:42 am

NoPar, when you get time, I’d appreciate an answer to the 2,730 pages of evidence I posted in our other discussion. An answer, BTW, is something other than “Total bollocks — you’re wrong again;” an answer actually considers the facts and addresses the point.
Since I’m the helpful type, here’s an example of an actual answer in the current discussion: “The DSM was wrong to list homosexuality under Section 302: Sexual Deviations BECAUSE…” All you need to do is put words (other than “bollocks” and “wrong again”) where the three dots are!
See how easy actual debate is? Even you can do it!

DocLiberty on December 13, 2007 at 9:15 am

Pasaran!, I should have known you’d show up here defending the butthole surfer crowd.
Hey Norman, are you and Pas a couple?

The Canadien on December 13, 2007 at 11:06 am

No one, and I mean no one,is surprised by this,it’s been strongly rumored for so many years.
Not that there’s not every single thing wrong with that.

OldSchoolW on December 13, 2007 at 11:23 am

The DSM was wrong to list homosexuality under Section 302: Sexual Deviations BECAUSE… it isn’t a deviation.

No Pasaran! on December 13, 2007 at 11:49 am

Hillary Cankles Rodham isn’t going to come out until she’s safely ensconced in the Oval Office.

lexi on December 13, 2007 at 11:56 am

“Hillary Cankles Rodham isn’t going to come out until she’s safely ensconced in the Oval Office.”
Clinton’s sexuality is her own affair, it’s nobodies business but hers.

No Pasaran! on December 13, 2007 at 12:12 pm

Scotty,
I also believe that homosexuality is a mental illness that is unfortunately treated as a civil rights issue and self expression issue. I definitely do not think it is a choice, as I know homosexuals who did really would not have chosen this fate. This isn’t even an issue of bigotry or hate, it is an issue of a harmful behavioral pattern that affects all of society.
Unfortunately, the only reason that homosexuality was removed from the DSM as a mental illness is because of lawsuits from the militant homosexual lobby, who also disrupted the APA’s meetings with sit ins and protests and infaltrated the profession to change the definition. The designation was not removed for any scientific reason.
Thank you, ScottyDog, for pointing to a major fact – there is no proof that homosexuality is not a mental illness. It is by its definition an abberant and deviant behavior engaged in by 1-2% of the population. Another thing I have noticed is that many of the homosexuals I met have other serious mental health issues or behavioral problems. While I know and have worked with some very nice and decent homosexuals, they generally don’t seem to be well adjusted people.

JasonBourne81 on December 13, 2007 at 1:51 pm

The DSM was wrong to list homosexuality under Section 302: Sexual Deviations BECAUSE… it isn’t a deviation.
Posted by: No Pasaran! at December 13, 2007 11:49 AM
Uh, it certainly is a deviation, No Pasran!
Courtesy of Webster
Main Entry:
1de?vi?ate
Pronunciation:
\ˈdē-vē-ˌāt\
Function:
verb
Inflected Form(s):
de?vi?at?ed; de?vi?at?ing
Etymology:
Late Latin deviatus, past participle of deviare, from Latin de- + via way ó more at way
Date:
circa 1633
intransitive verb 1 : to stray especially from a standard, principle, or topic 2 : to depart from an established course or norm
Main Entry:
de?vi?a?tion
Pronunciation:
\ˌdē-vē-ˈā-shən\
Function:
noun
Date:
15th century
: an act or instance of deviating: as a: deflection of the needle of a compass caused by local magnetic influences (as in a ship) b: the difference between a value in a frequency distribution and a fixed number (as the mean) c: departure from an established ideology or party line d: noticeable or marked departure from accepted norms of behavior
As homosexuals make up a tiny contingent (1-2%) of the population, it is a deviant behavior and sexual deviation.

JasonBourne81 on December 13, 2007 at 1:54 pm

JasonBourne81, you are correct. Homosexuality was an illness until the homosexual lobby pressured the APA to downgrade it to deviation. I personally believe it is a defect in the DNA material, but don’t really care. I love gays. My hairdresser is gay.

lexi on December 13, 2007 at 2:49 pm

No Pasaran! spewed out the following falsehood:
“The DSM was wrong to list homosexuality under Section 302: Sexual Deviations BECAUSE… it isn’t a deviation.”
Says who, you?
Ever heard of the bell curve, based on the arithmetic calculations alone, she is Abby Normal.
Although the APA removed homosexuality from the DSM in 1972, it was not because the research or the disorder had changed.
It was the result of militant Gay Activists pressuring the APA. The silence among researchers was not brought about by new scientific evidence showing homosexuality to be a normal and healthy variant of human sexuality; rather it became fashionable not to discuss homosexuality as a problem any longer.
Grab a course catalog or textbook on Abnormal Psychology from any major university prior to 1972 and you will find that Homosexuality was considered a mental disorder.
Just because it has become Politically Correct to say homosexuality is normal, does not make it so.
You need to brush up on your math skills, I attended College in the late 60’s early 1970’s. I went back in 1994 to update my education and witnessed the re-writing of history by secular progressives(communists)first hand.
60 years ago would have me in college at the end of WWII, 5 years before the first DSM was published in 1952.

ScottyDog on December 13, 2007 at 3:18 pm

“No Pasaran! spewed out the following falsehood:
“The DSM was wrong to list homosexuality under Section 302: Sexual Deviations BECAUSE… it isn’t a deviation.”
Says who, you?”
Yes correct, me.
**
I have grey eyes, this according to your logic makes me a deviant.
I’m not particularly attracted to women with died blonde hair, silicone breast enhancements, and heavily photoshopped portrait photographs.
According to your logic if I was an American conservative this would make me a sexual deviant, given that I don’t conform to YOUR norm.

No Pasaran! on December 13, 2007 at 3:30 pm

The term “homophobia” makes about as much sense as “islamophobia”.

Genius on December 13, 2007 at 4:07 pm

Having a different eye color is a physical trait not a form of CHOSEN behavior.

Ford Jones on December 13, 2007 at 4:19 pm

I wouldn’t waste too much time on NoPar, Ford. To sum up our discussion under “There will be blood”:
NP claimed every dictionary in the world proves me wrong about the meaning of a word — the Oxford English Dictionary proves me correct.
NP claimed I don’t cite peer reviewed scholars for my claims — my source was written by a Master at Cambridge and a Professor Emeritus at UNC-Chapel Hill.
NP claimed I mouthed off about cricket while being clueless about it. I AM clueless about cricket, but I have never claimed or, frankly, desired any familiarity with the sport. I thought he had a typo in a baseball reference.
In short, you can cite evidence until NEXT Christmas, and NP will keep typing “You’re wrong again! Bollocks bollocks bollocks!”
Incidentally, Merry Christmas and/or Happy Hannukkah, as appropriate.

DocLiberty on December 13, 2007 at 4:42 pm

Merry Christmas or Happy Hannukkah to you

Ford Jones on December 13, 2007 at 5:15 pm

“Having a different eye color is a physical trait not a form of CHOSEN behavior.”
Homosexuality is not a chosen behavior.
**
“NP claimed every dictionary in the world proves me wrong about the meaning of a word — the Oxford English Dictionary proves me correct.”
errrr, not it didn’t. You simply chose to ignore the sentence that backed up my claim.
**
“NP claimed I don’t cite peer reviewed scholars for my claims — my source was written by a Master at Cambridge and a Professor Emeritus at UNC-Chapel Hill.”
Oh puhrleaze. You LOST that debate – get over it. I piled up the evidence that Hitler was a Christian in front of you, and you responded by running away from the debate and by attempting to turn this in to a debate about whether Hugh Trevor-Roper is an academic or not.
**
“NP claimed I mouthed off about cricket while being clueless about it. I AM clueless about cricket, but I have never claimed or, frankly, desired any familiarity with the sport. I thought he had a typo in a baseball reference.”
So your point is that you were displaying cricket ignorance in falsely accusing me of baseball ignorance – which is exactly the point I made.
Sheeesh.
**
“In short, you can cite evidence until NEXT Christmas, and NP will keep typing “You’re wrong again! Bollocks bollocks bollocks!”
But here’s the thing, you’re all mouth and trousers – you shout a lot but you don’t debate. There’s never any meat to your arguments, you don’t bother with anything as inconvenient as ‘facts’ or ‘proof’. This very lack of beef in your alleged debating style is what makes it difficult to take you as a poster – or as a human being, seriously. You are just a right-wing troll who sneers from the sidelines but runs away from substantive arguments.
**
“Incidentally, Merry Christmas and/or Happy Hannukkah, as appropriate.”
…and a happy kwanzaa to you to.

No Pasaran! on December 14, 2007 at 9:07 am

DocLibertyÖ ignore No Pasaran!Ö heís just a Decemberist.
You called him a troll, I said he sneers, and the parrot simply repeats.
I see these Decemberists every year, pagans or atheists who attack Christianity at Christmas because they canít just live and let be. They preach tolerance, but the hypocrites never practice any. Decemberists want you to be as negative, rootless and as hopeless as they are. Spiritually theyíre descendants of Cain.
Atheists and Muslims are real practitioners of that religion of Satan. Distilled down, that religion is hate and murder.
The entrenched abortive mindset in America and Canada that has killed millions is directly linked to secular humanism and the atheists. Atheists are more given to murder actually than Muslims are, believe it or not! Check the numbers. Millions aborted.
It ainít the Christians doing that, or Orthodox Jews.
Merry Christmas to you, DocLiberty.

The Canadien on December 14, 2007 at 12:04 pm

Hey NP,
You said homosexuality was not a deviant behavior. I posted dictionary definitions from Websters. Care to mealy mouth your way around them?

JasonBourne81 on December 14, 2007 at 3:17 pm

JasonBourne81,
Is being left-handed a deviation or a variation?
The Canadien,
With all the hate and stupidity you’re spewing, you must be a spawn of Satan. Nah, you’re just a stupid Neanderthal.

Norman Blitzer on December 15, 2007 at 12:28 am

Jason you numpty, just because a minority of people are homosexuals that doesn’t make homosexuality deviant behavior.
**
Canadien, I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again.
You are in urgent need of psychiatric help.

No Pasaran! on December 15, 2007 at 12:08 pm

AhÖ All Pasaran!Ö it’s quite obvious that you’re the one with mental health issues.
I MEAN it’s clear to all of us, brother, that there’s something going on with you that can’t be easily explained away by your lower IQ, EQ, proclaimed atheism etc.

The Canadien on December 15, 2007 at 2:05 pm

That’s all I get?? That’s a little weak Canadien, even by your normal limp-wristed standards.

No Pasaran! on December 16, 2007 at 4:11 am