December 22, 2010, - 2:17 pm
Wikileaks: Huge #s of UK Muslims Support Violent Jihad, Sharia; Muslims Most Likely 2B Unemployed, Claim “Disability”
More important information from Wikileaks that will probably go unnoticed because it contrasts starkly with the narrative about Muslims in the West. As you read this, you should note that there is absolutely nothing different about Muslims in the U.S. and Muslims in the U.K., other than a different accent. And, as I’ve pointed out on this site, several years ago, 1/3 of American Muslims support violent jihad/terrorism, too. And almost half (and I think this number is conservative) want Islamic law a/k/a sharia to govern.
Wikileaks: Huge, Growing Number of Muslims Support Violent Jihad, Islamic Law Governing UK
None of this is news to me or you, as I’ve been saying it for over a decade, when ignoramuses and pretenders like Victor Davis Hanson were still gushing the BS about how “most Muslims are peaceful.” (Some “historian.”) But it’s always great to have U.S. diplomatic cables providing more affirmation and confirmation that they know better, too.
As reader Duane asks:
What would the media say about Christians [DS: Or Jews] if 32% of them said something similar? Here is a thought, cut off the welfare to these individuals and leave them less time to plot against a country that is treating them far better than they deserve.
Indeed. I’m no fan of Julian Assange, and he should be prosecuted. But I’m glad this stuff is being leaked. It shows us that our authorities–as we know–know very well that Muslims are not the “tolerant,” “moderate,” “peaceful” “democrats” that they constantly fertilize about. We know they know better, and we know they are lying through their teeth and don’t believe their own BS on this. This is just more affirmation. And, of course, they keep recommending the usual pandering “outreach” BS to these Muslim supporters of mass murder of innocent civilians. As the loathsome Dr. Phil would say, “And Howzz That Workin’ For Ya?” Not too well, as even the cables admit.
My favorite thing about this latest stuff from Wikileaks is the 24% “disability” rate among Muslims. Riiiight. This is just more of what we see a ton of in the Detroit area and other highly concentrated Muslim populations. They scam and defraud the system and milk it to their hearts’ content, while you–the taxpayer–pick up the tab. It’s a sharp reality check contrast to the constant BS about Muslims being such high-income, entrepreneurial, positive sources, who are productive and not a welfare constituency. Sorry, but we know better. They are in fact the Al-Welfare Queens of not just Britain, but Dearbornistan and Detroit and Flint and Coldwater and Patterson and Brooklyn and Minneapolis/St. Paul and Seattle. And everywhere else.
Around a third of young British Muslims favour killing in the name of Islam, according to a survey revealed by the WikiLeaks’ publication of U.S. diplomatic cables.
A survey of 600 Muslim students at 30 universities throughout Britain found that 32 per cent of Muslim respondents believed killing in the name of religion is justified.
A U.S. diplomatic cable from January 2009 quoted a poll by the Centre for Social Cohesion as saying 54 per cent wanted a Muslim party to represent their world view in Parliament and 40 per cent want Muslims in the UK to be under Sharia law.
The survey results, revealed by WikiLeaks’ release of thousands of U.S. diplomatic cables, suggests increasing radicalisation among Britain’s young Muslims.
A further U.S. cable, dated February 5 2009, said reaching out to Britain’s Muslim community there was a ‘top priority’ for U.S. embassy staff.
It stated: ‘Although people of Muslim faith make up only 3 to 4 per cent of the UK’s population, outreach to this key audience is vital to U.S. foreign policy interests in the UK and beyond… This is a top mission priority.’
The February cable outlined a plan encompassing ‘engagement and community capacity-building’ to counter the possible growth of ‘violent extremism’ in the UK.
The outreach plan for British Muslims was published a month after a cable that revealed that while the community had grown to more than 2 million, unemployment rates were higher among Muslim men and women than in any other religion.
Muslims were also found to have the highest disability rates – with 24 per cent of men and 21 per cent of women claiming a disability – while the cable also cited statistics claiming Muslims were also the most likely group to be unavailable for work or not actively seeking employment due to illness, their studies or family commitments.
It was revealed last week that a U.S. cable from 2006 had suggested the British Government had made ‘little progress’ in engaging Muslims and combating homegrown extremism.
And the latest cable revelations of U.S. ambassadorial plan to empower Muslim communities to ‘mobilize against extremism’ and ‘build community resilience’ confirms the White House’s lack of faith in the British Government’s ability to engage with the UK’s Islamic population.
Hilarious. Yup, the Muslims who openly support Hezbollah and HAMAS and 98% of whom won’t condemn those groups are gonna “mobilize against extremism.” Like having Domino’s Pizza “mobilize” against crust, sauce, cheese, toppings, and customers.
Like I said, there is NO DIFFERENCE between the Muslims in Britain–the Muslims detailed in these leaked cables–and the ones in the U.S. No difference.
Tags: cables, diplomatic cables, disability, Extremism, Great Britain, Islam, Islamic Terrorism, Jihad, killing, murder, Muslims, polls, sharia, surveys, UK, unemployed, US, violence, Wikileaks
Yeah, I’m not big on classified info getting leaked out,but some of the info should not have been classified. The government tries to keep secret things that should be made public like this…what I don’t like about Wikileaks is how the information was obtained,illegally, by a traitor to our military and our country, Bradley Manning.
I’m all for free speech and freedom of the press but the material was obtained illegally, the only good out of it is information like this is getting exposed and I believe the cables proved Bush was right about WMD in Iraq. As long as names of informants or our national security are not jeopardized the rest of it seems like stuff we should have been given anyway. Thanks for sharing about this study. Too bad the truth means nothing to those in this administration.
freedom4usa on December 22, 2010 at 3:30 pm