March 8, 2017, - 4:39 pm
Is It Really “A Day Without Women”? Nope & Here’s Why . . .
So, today is supposed to be “International Women’s Day”–a day I never heard of and couldn’t give less of a crap about. It’s also supposed to be “A Day Without a Woman,” as organized by revolting HAMAS Muslim Linda Sarsour, whose surname–as I’ve noted before–literally means cockroach (in Arabic) or pimp (in Hebrew). She’s both (with apologies to cockroaches and pimps for the comparison). Just like my recent “Day Without Immigrants,” my “Day Without a Woman” is going just fine. How ’bout yours? But it’s really not “a day without women” at all. Not even close. And here’s why . . . .
She’s still here/ . . .
She’s still here . . .
She’s still here . . .
She’s still here–HAMAS/ISIS Pimp/Cockroach Linda Sarsour . . .
And she’s still here . . .
Oh, and they’re still here . . .
Etc. Etc. Etc. Ad nauseam.
So, when they tell you it’s “a day without women,” it really isn’t.
Although, only their gynecologist knows for sure if these hags are really women.
Tags: A Day Without A Woman
Is it my imagination, or does Chelsea Hell’s Kitchen (I’m sure New York City denizens who frequent this site would appreciate the reference) look a tad haggard in some spots in that pic? Not that she is or was a raving beauty (far from it, like most liberal women) but she had looked somewhat better than when she was growing up “way back when.”
And of course, the fingerprints of a man – George Soros – are all over this “day without women[sic].”
Concerned Patriot on March 8, 2017 at 5:10 pm