March 18, 2010, - 5:46 am

Sean Hannity’s Freedom CONcert Scam: Almost None of Charity’s $ Went to Injured Troops, Kids of Fallen Troops; G5s for Vannity?

By Debbie Schlussel

***  UPDATE, 4/5/10:  Responding to Schlussel Expose, Charity Navigator Downgrades Hannity Charity: Freedom Alliance Rating Now Only 2 Stars (”Needs Improvement”) ***

**** Check out my UPDATES to this story: 03/25/10 – Big Business: Who Owns the Freedom Concerts? How Sean Hannity’s Private Jets, Luxe SUVs, Suites Were Paid & 03/24/10 – Semantics of Vannity: New Hannity Soldiers Scam – “Buy My Book, (Non-Existent) Profits Go to Troops Charity” ****

****03/19/10:  SCROLL DOWN FOR UPDATE: My Response to Freedom Alliance’s/Oliver North’s Weak “Non-Response” & New Lies  ****

For the last several years, Sean Hannity and the Freedom Alliance “charity” have conducted “Freedom Concerts” across America. They’ve told you that they are raising money to pay for the college tuition of the children of fallen soldiers and to pay severely wounded war vets.  And on Friday Night, Hannity will be honored with an award for this “Outstanding Community Service by a Radio Talk Show Host” at Talkers Magazine’s  convention.

But it’s all a huge scam.

freedomconcerthannity

In fact, less than 20%–and in two recent years, less than 7% and 4%, respectively–of the money raised by Freedom Alliance went to these causes, while millions of dollars went to expenses, including consultants and apparently to ferry the Hannity posse of family and friends in high style. And, despite Hannity’s statements to the contrary on his nationally syndicated radio show, few of the children of fallen soldiers got more than $1,000-$2,000, with apparently none getting more than $6,000, while Freedom Alliance appears to have spent tens of thousands of dollars for private planes.  Moreover, despite written assurances to donors that all money raised would go directly to scholarships for kids of the fallen heroes and not to expenses, has begun charging expenses of nearly $500,000 to give out just over $800,000 in scholarships.

In February 2009, a well-known conservative writer sent me this, about a friend at FOX News:

The guy went on to tell me about Hannity’s “Freedom Concerts,” which are staged across the country with the proceeds going to children of slain soldiers. Of course, as the guy tells it, there’d be a lot more money every concert to go to the cause if Hannity didn’t demand–and get–use of a Gulfstream 5 plane to fly him and his family/entourage to the concerts; a “fleet” (that’s the word the guy used) of either Cadillac or Lincoln SUVs for him and his family/entourage; and several suites at really expensive hotels for him and his family/entourage. The promoter apparently values Hannity’s star demands at well over $200,000 per event. The source says he heard that Oliver North pulled Hannity aside at one of the concerts and told him that this had to stop. But that may mean that, from now on, Hannity has to fly on a G4 instead of a G5, gets only a few luxury SUVs, and two or three suites.

North is the founder and honorary chairman of Freedom Alliance.

I began investigating these claims, and lo and behold, I discovered that Freedom Alliance gives very little money to the children of slain troops to pay for college and even less to wounded troops.  The stories of injuries to troops and how much Freedom Alliance gives them–$200 for a soldier from a poor neighborhood who lost three limbs–is heartbreaking.  Soldiers with traumatic brain injuries, severe wounds to the face from disfiguring burns and explosions, and multiple amputations got $1,000 or less, with only a handful of exceptions.

The tax forms available to the public for the Freedom Alliance–for the years 2006-2008–paint a tragic story, a story of a charity that makes gazillions and spends very little for the purposes it claims, a charity that spends millions more on its small staff and crony consultants than it ever gives in scholarships to the children of the fallen or severely injured troops or in aid to the injured troops themselves.  While Hannity’s Freedom Concerts take in millions, only a few hundred thousand go to the claimed intended recipients.

Over a year ago, when I began looking into this story, I contacted both Sean Hannity and the Freedom Alliance seeking comment and an accounting for where the money went.  Both declined to answer any of my questions.  Hannity refused to respond to an inquiry I sent to his personal private e-mail address asking him about the lavish expenses described in the e-mail above.

Freedom Alliance press secretary Alan Moore scheduled an interview for me with Freedom Alliance president Thomas Kilgannon, who in the past used Freedom Alliance resources to promote a book he wrote on the United Nations.  But when Moore asked me what the interview would be about and I answered truthfully, the interview was not granted, and my calls to him were never returned thereafter.  I told him I’d be asking Mr. Kilgannon about the expenses paid for Hannity and about the paltry percentage of Freedom Alliance funds actually going to the kids of fallen troops, to severely injured troops, and to anything other than expenses, consultants, and printing.  I wanted to know why Freedom Alliance had spent $60,000 for “aviation services” in 2006.

Keep in mind that a charity is considered reputable if no more than 25% of its revenue goes to expenses and no less than 75% of it goes to the intended charity recipients.  Given that, Freedom Alliance’s balance sheets are embarrassing in their shamelessness.

According to its 2006 tax returns, Freedom Alliance reported revenue of $10, 822, 785, but only $397,900–or a beyond-measly 3.68%–of that was given to the children of fallen troops as scholarships or as aid to severely injured soldiers.

On the other hand, 62% of the money went to “expenses,” including $979,485 for “consultants” and an “advisor.” Yes, consultant/advisors got more than double what injured troops and the kids of fallen troops got. The tax forms show that “New World Aviation” got paid $60,601 for “air travel.” Was that for Hannity’s G5? Like I said, neither the charity nor Hannity is talking. And finally, that year, Freedom Alliance spent $1,730,816 on postage and shipping and $1,414,215 on printing, for a total of $3,145,031, nearly half the revenue the charity spent that year and about eight times what the injured troops and the children of fallen ones received.

That’s especially heartbreaking when you compare the hundreds of thousands consultants got and the millions spent on printing and postage to the outrageously small amounts given to wounded soldiers. In 2006, Freedom Alliance gave only $1,000 to a soldier from Bay City, Michigan, whom the charity says was in the following condition:

Face was blown up and lost sight in one eye.

And that $1,000 was relatively generous, when you consider this soldier from Romulus, Michigan, whom Freedom Alliance only gave $200:

SM [serviceman] was involved in roadside bomb incident in Iraq, which caused loss of both legs and left arm.

Romulus is a mostly Black Detroit suburb, which is one of the poorest cities in Michigan and in America. Freedom Alliance gave this brave soldier roughly $67 per limb. That’s sickening.

So is the fact that this soldier, from Alexandria, Virginia, also only got $200 from Freedom Alliance:

SM was wounded in Iraq by an IED explosion.  Lost right arm and severe shrapnel wounds to upper body and face.

Also appalling is the fact that in each year’s tax returns soldiers described as having brain trauma injuries, multiple amputated limbs, and severe burns over most of their bodies get a few hundred bucks each from Freedom Alliance and in almost every case, no more than $1,000.

That year, while fat-cat consultants and expenses took millions of Freedom Alliance’s money, seriously wounded troops to whom Freedom Alliance donated received a pathetic average of $785 each and the college student kids of the fallen got a paltry average of $2,943 toward tuition. Yes, out of millions raised that year by Sean Hannity at his Freedom Concerts, only $309,000 was given out in scholarships to 105 students, and only $110,703.82 was given to the wounded soldiers.

Freedom Alliance’s 2007 tax returns aren’t much better. Out of $12,459,317 it raised that year, only $895,347–or just 7%–went to seriously wounded troops and scholarships for fallen troops. 53% went to expenses, including $1,464,627 in postage and $1,151,428 in printing. $604,995 went to “professional fees” and “consultants.” Out of millions paid for Freedom Concert tickets and raised in fundraisers by Hannity listeners, only $596,500 went to college scholarships for soldiers who died in battle, and only $299,897 went to horribly injured troops. 208 student children of the fallen got an average of $2,868 apiece for tuition, though many got only $1,000 or less. 382 soldiers with serious injuries got an average of $785 each.

And, again, that year, the amounts given to soldiers with such grave injuries is despicably tiny. This soldier, from Killeen, Texas, got only $500 from Freedom Alliance:

SM was wounded in Iraq on June 18, 2007 in Digula Province, Baquba, Iraq. An IED exploded on the truck, he took shrapnel to the face, which cut off a piece of his nose. Also had shrapnel in throat and cheeks, which cut open his face and the inside of his throat.

This soldier, from Brady, Texas, also received just $500 from Freedom Alliance:

While serving in Baghdad Iraq, SM was hit with an IED blast. Sustained disfigurement, blindness, and superficial burns on face, hearing loss to right ear, TBI, peppered shrapnel to the face and right upper extremity.

And then, there are the 2008 Freedom Alliance tax forms, which were signed in November 2009 and filed only recently.  That year, Freedom Alliance took in $8,781,431 in revenue and gave $1,060,275.57 total–or just 12%–to seriously wounded soldiers and for scholarships to kids of the fallen.  Remember, this is well below the 75% required to be considered a legitimate charity.  And after claiming in written letters to donors that 100% of the money donated, via the Freedom Concerts or otherwise, to the scholarships would go directly to the scholarships and not to expenses, the Freedom Alliance decided to do the contrary and charge expenses anyway–charging a whopping $436,386 to give out $802,250 in scholarships.  That means that 35% of the $1,238,636–all of which was supposed to go to scholarships for these kids of the fallen–went to Freedom Alliance.

Freedom Alliance spent $5,375,654–or 61% of its total revenue earned in 2008–on expenses, but actually 80% of the total revenue spent and given out for that year.  That includes $1,055,791 spent on postage and $925,392 on printing.  It spent $157,041 on travel.  Is this the item that includes the money for the alleged Sean Hannity Gulfstream flights?  Like I said, neither the charity nor Hannity will answer questions.

Meanwhile, 167 students got an average of just $4,803.89 each in tuition.  With the amount this charity raises, these kids should all be getting a free ride paid for by Freedom Alliance.

And 299 very seriously injured soldiers got an average of just $805.21 each for very grave injuries.  And the heartbreak of their stories and the disgustingly low amount donated to them continues.  This soldier, from Laurel, MD, got just $1,000:

SM lost both legs and one arm, below elbow, due to IED blast.  SM also lost hearing in both ears on April 21, 2008.

Wow, while Sean Hannity and his friends at Freedom Alliance are paying their crony consultants hundreds of thousands of dollars, they’re giving this soldier $200 per limb lost or rendered useless.

This soldier, from Fort Sam Houston, Texas (where my own father was first sent when he was drafted during Vietnam), fared even worse in Freedom Alliance’s “generosity,” receiving only $165:

SM is a bilateral amputee with 30% facial burns sustained during IED blast, 31 May 2008, OEF.

Just $165 for that?  Pathetic.  And so very tragic.

Since Sean Hannity is always bragging about his phony “investigations” (stuff he just rips off from others) and “investigative” skills, you’d think he could figure out how to read a tax return and bother to look at Freedom Alliance’s.  But you would be wrong.  He has neither the skills nor the desire.  He knows better and is well aware that they waste money on him and his luxe accommodations and travel.  But this isn’t about that or truly about helping the troops and the kids of our war dead.  It’s about promoting himself, the same way Angelina Jolie and Madonna get the press to film them in Africa.

To make matters worse, Hannity deliberately lied to his radio audience about how much money was going to the kids of the fallen American soldiers.  On May 28th of last year, Hannity told his listeners, “Our new sponsor, Boca Java, just pledged $30,000 to the Freedom Concerts.  That will provide a full one-year college scholarship for a kid of a fallen soldier.”  In fact, Freedom Alliance’s tax forms indicate it has never given any student more than $6,000 in a school year, and usually it’s been far less.  Many students only get $1,000, which will barely cover anything at most colleges, today.  A Boca Java spokeswoman told me that last year was the coffee purveyor’s last one sponsoring the Freedom Concerts, as it now donates directly to the troops, sending them free coffee and through sales of its Brew of Bravery.

A friend of mine was one of the artists who performed in Hannity’s Freedom Concerts and was shocked when I showed him the tax forms and the expenses.  He no longer performs at the concerts because he was tired of the egomania.  Now, he’s just angry.  “We paid our own way and for all of our costs and expenses to perform because we thought we were helping the troops and their families and that all the money was going to them.”

In investigating Freedom Alliance and its tax forms, I learned that the organizations which evaluate charities are entirely worthless.  Freedom Alliance is certified as “Best in America” by the “Independent Charities of America.”  It is also rated a “Four Star Charity” by “Charity Navigator.”  Both of these “ratings” are posted prominently on Freedom Alliance’s website, misleading donors into believing they are donating to a worthy cause, when in fact they are mostly donating to a black hole of expenses.  Even Charity Navigator notes in its strange, illogical, and mostly inaccurate Four Star rating that Freedom Alliance has a fund-raising “efficiency” of only nine cents on the dollar.  And, in fact, Charity Navigator’s ridiculous rating formula robotically crunches numbers in a way that considers the money spent mostly on consultants, postage, and printing as having gone to the wounded soldiers and kids of fallen soldiers, when in fact that’s not where it went at all.  It simply can’t be taken seriously.

And I’m not the only one who noticed.  The comments on Charity Navigator’s Freedom Alliance page are indicative that those who checked this charity’s tax forms also note the scam.

“Wonkling” wrote:

If you look at the actual 990, it breaks down its program expenses. They actually spent more money this past year on postage than they did over the past 4 years on scholarships. They paid 60k to an air company, millions to consultants, marketing, fundraising. Their actual expenditures on funds for children of killed/disabled veterans is far less than what they paid themselves or their consultants. Having a large capacity (4 stars) should not overshadow a cumbersome efficiency rating (2 stars).

“Chickenbone” wrote:

Since 2003 Freedom Alliance has collected in cash $48,241,571! Since 2003 they have spent on the Wounded and Dead Veterans and their Families $1,781,782 or .036 cents on the dollar, according to their own IRS 990’s!

Yes, Sean Hannity’s Freedom Concerts are just a giant con.  His gushing lumpenconservatariat fans and listeners actually believe he’s doing good, while he travels in style around the country feeding his ego.  It’s a win-win for him.  But it’s a lose-lose for the donors (who are mostly hard-working, Middle Americans who want to help our troops and their families and bought concert tickets and held other fundraisers) and mostly a loser for the kids of the fallen troops and the troops, themselves, who survived with very serious injuries.

You’ve heard the saying, “Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.”  I love patriotism, but in this case, Sean Hannity’s “Freedom Concerts” and the Freedom Alliance are Exhibit A of that saying.  But they’re not really patriots.  Not even close.  Their only patriotism is to the faces they see in their mirrors.  Hey, Sean, you’re a “Great American.”

Sadly, the real great Americans–the ones who gave their lives and the ones who survived but gave their limbs and their skin for this country–are getting ripped off.

****  UPDATE, 03/18/10:  Just as I expected, the liars and frauds at Freedom Alliance want to keep the gravy train going for them and their cronies.  So they’ve issued a “response,” which doesn’t refute a single fact in here and frankly provides no hard evidence of anything . . . because they don’t have any. One of the “prominent bloggers” who posted the phony response is Erick Erickson, a guy who supports Rand Paul and the other 9/11 Truther Paul, and who defended Emily Zanotti, the lunatic who has been stalking me for four years and who praised Muslim death, rape, and torture threats against me and my family.  Yes, sadly, there are a growing number of anti-Semites on the right, and Erick Erickson is one of them.  And the anti-Semites are now the defenders of this rip off of our seriously wounded troops and the kids of our fallen heroes.

Here is my response to their extremely weak PR attempt at CYA:

In fact, the Freedom Alliance “response” doesn’t answer any of the questions I raised and goes on to lie more. They don’t address why they gave a triple amputee only $200—and in fact there are many of these examples provided in their tax return addendum, but I only cited a few for brevity’s sake. They also lie and claim that they gave a lot more money to charity b/c they categorize it as “program expenses.” But I’m sorry—calling $3 million in consulting fees, printing, and postage “program expenses” doesn’t change the fact that it still went to their cronies, not to a fund and not the soldiers who only got on average less than $900 apiece. It also doesn’t change the fact that out of the money spent (I didn’t use the money they claim they raised for their scholarship fund) the vast majority goes to those kinds of expenses.

Also, the “scholarship fund” is really a war chest for something else. We’ve been at war since 2001, when we went into Afghanistan, and we’re winding down in Iraq. Unless the kids were born in 2001 or thereafter, many of these kids are in college now and Freedom Alliance is giving them a pittance toward their college tuition, while they continue to build this massive war chest. With a giant multi-million dollar fund, why aren’t they giving the kids a free, complete ride to college? And how many kids of deceased troops will there be in the future? Enough to exhaust a multi-million dollar fund? Doubtful.

Moreover, because they hoarded millions of dollars, their returns show the fund shrunk by several million dollars with bad investments and market losses. That money could have put these kids through college for the entire time. What’s their excuse for the soldiers with no limbs and with severe burns? Are they waiting for two decades from now when technology is better? $165 for a soldier who is blind and his face blew up? No excuse for that. Their “response” is simply a non-response and an attempt to cover up the fraud. I will be posting more on this and on more fraud at Freedom Alliance, in the coming days. Stay tuned.
DS

**** Check out my UPDATES to this story: 03/25/10 – Big Business: Who Owns the Freedom Concerts? How Sean Hannity’s Private Jets, Luxe SUVs, Suites Were Paid & 03/24/10 – Semantics of Vannity: New Hannity Soldiers Scam – “Buy My Book, (Non-Existent) Profits Go to Troops Charity” ****

***  UPDATE, 4/5/10:  Responding to Schlussel Expose, Charity Navigator Downgrades Hannity Charity: Freedom Alliance Rating Now Only 2 Stars (”Needs Improvement”) ***




Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


539 Responses

You just have to listen to his radio show to develop mistrust for this guy. Half of it is commercials, and the rest is him plugging his next book/concert/appearance and taking calls from gushing fans. And he interviews the same people all the time Malkin,Rove,Gingrich. His show is weird.

Ryan on March 19, 2010 at 12:05 pm

Oh boo hoo.

Let’s see what kind of scrutiny y’all could stand up too on related and similar issues …

But wait – most libs only give *lip* service, not their *money* to causes … so in that vein, how much does Debbie contribute to various charities?

Is it more than Sean generates with this cause?

I’ll bet not.

Signed: _Jim

_Jim on March 19, 2010 at 12:04 pm

I wonder what you would think if Bill Clinton were running this scam.
The way I see it, a scam victimizing charitable donors who want to help veterans is a dirty low-down rotten thing to do, no matter who does it.
Again, we see some fine moral relativism by a “Conservative”.

Dr. Steve on March 19, 2010 at 12:09 pm

    Dr. your point is not well taken since Billy Clinton is not running a scam like Hannity. This is the sort of recalcitrance to the truth is disturbing.

    Why can’t us true conservatives recognized that all that time Hannity has spent in NYC has finally turned him into a limousine liberal he so despises.

    Howie Feltsnatcher Esq. on March 19, 2010 at 12:27 pm

    The key is how the funds are collected. There are very few pure donations in this organization. Most of the revenue is generated from concerts and merchandise sales. Unlike the Red Cross which people just give money to. Are their expenses too high and are benefits to the operators too high. Maybe, maybe not. But to say he is pocketing millions is a total fabrication as it would be disclosed on the tax returns. Is good being created in a direct manner to the troops? Yes they are given cash. Is awareness being raised among those not serving? Even you are aware. Is there an efficient use of the money raised AFTER expenses. I would say yes. But in order to make any statements, whether this is a good charity to donate money to, you would first have to strip out the fundraising expenses. Certainly look at those expenses and there may in fact be ways to save more money so that it could be use for the cause.

    Not Dr. Steve on March 19, 2010 at 12:47 pm

    Hey Jim,

    You say,. ‘most libs only give *lip* service, not their *money* to causes’ – please cite your source here or just tell me you pulled it out of your a**

    Also you ask, ‘in that vein, how much does Debbie contribute to various charities?’

    Debbie’s no lib. She’s as ultra-consrvative as they come. I guess you – as a knee jerk hannity guy – wouldn’t know that.

    alex milstein on March 19, 2010 at 3:43 pm

Why should it matter if Hannity spends 12 million on personal expenses if he is donating over 800 thousand? Either way, 800 grand is a lot of money and besides his concerts are universally uplifting. Why look a gift horse in the mouth? The truth is, if Sean is using the money to defeat democrats we should be glad because this also helps the troops and the morale of the troops. The more you criticize Sean the more you are really helping the enemy and helping defeat republicans.

KevinJ on March 19, 2010 at 12:05 pm

Reply
=============
I wonder what the troops would think of Sean pocketing the millions of dollars intended for their wounded friends.

Dr. Steve on March 19, 2010 at 12:11 pm

    So far I see nothing here that proves that Hannity broke a promise. He never promised to send 50% to the troops or 80% to the troops. If he made a promise and broke it that would be different. If the operating costs are going to Sean himself I think they would be glad. He supports the troops and getting demcrats out of office.

    KevinJ on March 19, 2010 at 12:34 pm

      Pull your head out, KevinJ, and check out this page from Hannity’s site and see for your ignorant self.

      http://www.hannity.com/pages/freedom-concerts

      or his Freedom Concert site.

      https://freedomconcerts.com/

      Yes, there is no “promise” to give 50% or 80%, but he clearly uses “I raised over $10 million” to make him seem like a swell, soldier-loving, patriotic American when in fact his own tax returns show he’s given no where near that amount of money. He may not be the webmaster, but his name is at the top of the page.

      The (lack of) buck stops with Hannity.

      And he may not be breaking a promise, but it sure as heck is false advertising and blatant misinformation for self-promotion.

      “I’m a great guy. I raised $10 million for the kids of dead soldiers. Buy my book.”

      KevinJ – you’re a typical, ignorant neo-conservative sheep. You don’t do your own due diligence, instead you just listen to the blathering of your leaders. I guess facts really don’t matter, huh?

      PhilB on March 19, 2010 at 1:17 pm

        Whatever

        KevinJ on March 19, 2010 at 1:54 pm

          Well-reasoned argument, KevinJ. We’re all smarter for it.

          PhilB on March 19, 2010 at 3:25 pm

      As mentioned in the above article, he did promise that the money donated would go completely to the soldiers and their children.

      Michelle on March 19, 2010 at 3:21 pm

    What does Bill Clinton have to do with this discussion? He’s not the one running this scam charity, and as far as I know he does not run any scam charities… Yet you bring his name up. It seems you just wish to blacken his name with the sins of Sean Hannity. Guilt by association? Or another knee-jerk, diversionary tactic to hide the truth behind a S**t-storm of lies and innuendo. How very Republican of you! How typically Conservative of you! Is there anything else you can think of to disrespect Democrats? How about taking ALL the charity money away from our injured troops? After all, it was a pack of Republican lies that began the war that caused their injuries, after all. And now that they’re just run-of-the-mill poor folks, you can look down your rich noses at them and tell yourself they’ve only themselves to blame for believing in lies, and that they don’t deserve any better. And while you’re all at it, make sure to block Pres. Obama’s changes to our health care “industry” (which also puts a ton of money into rich peoples’ pockets) — you wouldn’t want them to get any “charity-welfare medical help” either, would you?

    Ley on March 19, 2010 at 1:52 pm

      Ley – you are completely ignorant or very stupid. To say Bubba does not run any bogus, scam charities is pathetically out of touch with reality. What do you call the Slickster’s Presidential Library and Massage Parlor in Arkansas? (Name thanks to Rush)

      Jarhead on March 19, 2010 at 3:03 pm

    KevinJ,

    You ask why should it matter how much Hannity skims off the top? Well, it’s a matter of law. You know, that thing conservatives claim to uphold?

    alex milstein on March 19, 2010 at 3:45 pm

That’s just sickening.

Ryan on March 19, 2010 at 12:17 pm

Ms. Schlussel,

You just accused a Conservative idol of running a con, of taking money from military families, of doing something naughty.

Is that allowed?

No offense, ma’am, but I think you’re going to lose your Magic Blind Allegiance to Rush, Rupert, Roger, and Talk Radio Decoder Ring for this one.

Word has it that the brunette with the accent, Atlas Slugs? Atlas Mugged? Atlas Is A Thug?, just got on her personal hotline to Avigdor Lieberman after reading this blog.

And ole’ Megyn Kelly (damn, she has aged) is working on some sort of rebuttal for Mr. Ailes.

This could be better than Massa tickling Beck.

That's Interesting on March 19, 2010 at 12:22 pm

Daily Kos blog brought this issue up in 2007.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/8/6/6165/93743

Jeremy on March 19, 2010 at 12:23 pm

this is what the left wing kooks have?? man they have really gone off the deepend

mike malone on March 19, 2010 at 12:26 pm

    really? i Guess coming from the repubs stealing money. you make such a great point 🙂 ………..just kidding

    nick on March 19, 2010 at 3:10 pm

to jcm and other Hannity apologists….

What the heck is wrong with you? You really want such a phony scamming scmuck as Hannity to carry the torch for conservatives? Tell me jcm (and all of you drones….damn right–DRONES…) what does it take for you to say–FRAUD!

If reading these tax returns and hearing what Hannity says and does under the pretense of helping soldier families does not merit your censure, what would it take? What say you Levin, North?

BB on March 19, 2010 at 12:27 pm

lets see what the left wings have contributed to our militay and their families… Not one red cent. All they want to do is demonize the military.

mitch simpson on March 19, 2010 at 12:29 pm

    That is an ignorant comment. I consider myself a liberal and have donated to several charities helping military personnel and their families. Therefore, even if you just count me (& I can’t believe that I’m the only one), your statement is false. And, it is because I do care about this issue, I am angry that this charity is giving so little of the money it takes in. If it was going to the NRA, I wouldn’t care less.

    Hannah M on March 19, 2010 at 1:07 pm

    Mitch, I’m a military member and have been for 16 years. I and the troops I know what nothing from Hannity or people like him. They are anti-American and is a major cause of the divide in this country. You are not very smart or very immature. A rip off is a rip off, Hannity has used “Support he Troops? phase to enhance his image and financial worth. He has done nothing for this country or the military. The same goes for his so called Freedom concerts. I you would like to discuss this furtther e-mail me!

    William on March 19, 2010 at 1:32 pm

    Sadly, you clearly believe that.
    us vs them all the way to hell, huh?

    wake up.
    deception is deception, and Hannity’s clearly qualifies.

    do what’s right, even if *gasp* someone on the “other side” suggested it.

    Chuck on March 19, 2010 at 1:42 pm

    Yo Mitch you A$$hat, we contribute our sons and daughters.
    The lives and limbs of the real “Good Americans” are sacrificed so that Rush and Sean can continue to spout their crap to his sheople. I did serve. I didn’t allow a butt cyst or multi deferments or go AWOL in my efforts to voluntarily serve my country.

    Trisync on March 19, 2010 at 1:44 pm

I did a similar investigation with another group, and discovered a tangential oddity. What the hell is going on what alleged charity watchdogs? CharityNavigator gives the Freedom Alliance a four star rating, with an 81.5% efficiency. I think it’s time for these “watchdogs” to start investigating themselves.

RomanHans on March 19, 2010 at 12:36 pm

“I wonder what you would think if Bill Clinton were running this scam. The way I see it, a scam victimizing charitable donors who want to help veterans is a dirty low-down rotten thing to do, no matter who does it.
Again, we see some fine moral relativism by a “Conservative”.

Dr. Steve on March 19, 2010 at 12:09 pm”

So, Dr(ibble) Steve will to cop to the charge as presented and now rakes in Bill Clinton while accusing me of ‘relativism’.

I’ll settle for his ‘copping to the charge’ of hypocrisy and move on …

Leftists and democrats: Going for a ‘scorched earth’ solution as usual; not content for some good being done in the world, it must be done as *they* specify or you’re horrid.

Signed: _Jim
.

_Jim on March 19, 2010 at 12:37 pm

    Yes, Jim, it must be done the way ‘they’ say. Of course in this case ‘they’ is the law that demands at least 75 percent of a charity’s revenue be redistributed to the people for whom it is a charity.

    That means wounded soldiers and their families. Not Sean Hannity’s private jets.

    alex milstein on March 19, 2010 at 3:50 pm

Great Expose’ Debs…
I cant stand Hannity, even though I make Strom Thurmond look like friggin Bernie Sanders..
Hannity literally says “Literally” more than literally any other talk show host in America, it literally drives me literally crazy.
Literally,
Frank

Frank Drackman on March 19, 2010 at 12:38 pm

“Why should it matter if Hannity spends 12 million on personal expenses if he is donating over 800 thousand?”

It is not his money. It’s money others have donated specifically to help our injured soldiers.

Billy on March 19, 2010 at 12:39 pm

    That is the point–People are contributing their hard earned money because they think they are helping military people and their families–not enabling Hannity, his posse, and the consultants to line their own pockets. Somehow, I think Hannity has enough money of his own–it’s the soldiers and their families who need it

    Hannah M on March 19, 2010 at 1:13 pm

The only thing more disgusting than this, is the fact that people are defending it.

Adam on March 19, 2010 at 12:40 pm

    well said Adam, I agree, the people who agree with it are DISGUSTING!!!

    TINA on March 19, 2010 at 2:44 pm

Thank you for this summary of FreedomWorks. I have long thought that Vannity was merely an uneducated, arrogant boor. Now, I see that he is a con-artist!

Hopefully, this scam will be more widely reported in the coming months. Although it won’t make a difference to the totally brain-washed segment of his audience, it should sure open the eyes of the majority of his fans who have been unwittingly duped by his feigned patriotism, humility and integrity.

He is even worse than the scumbag I expected him to be. I look forward to the day when he is exposed.

Bo on March 19, 2010 at 12:43 pm

This is the sort of journalism that the major media used to do – way back before 24-hour-news … or news programs being marketed to meet a profit-margin … or ubiquitous product-placements.

Excellent post.

Frankly, I can’t find much of anything to agree with in your political writing – but to espouse conservatism & then go on to expose a FOX NEWS pundit for his part in a scam of such loathsomely egregious venality, & especially one so popular & famous, is an action both profoundly courageous & worthy of the highest merit.

Gut-wrenching material with plenty of cold hard facts to back it up = BEST OF THE WEB.

jim on March 19, 2010 at 12:44 pm

I’m no fan of Hannity and maybe their are outrageous excesses involved in these concerts. But sadly many, many charities operate with about the same level of expenses-to-giving ratio. I checked out this charity on Charity Navigator, they had a 5 star rating?!? While many prefer to handle their donations privately rather than allowing the government to do charity work, charities are either intentionally poorly run, or they are just not economical.

http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=6590

B: You clearly aren’t a fan of reading, either. I addressed this. The rating is worthless. Charity Navigator considers the wasteful expenses of millions to consultants and stamps/postage as having gone to the charity’s recipients. Try reading before engaging in premature articulation. DS

Bebe99 on March 19, 2010 at 12:44 pm

“Reply
=============
I wonder what the troops would think of Sean pocketing the millions of dollars intended for their wounded friends.

Dr. Steve on March 19, 2010 at 12:11 pm”

Wow. A fine example of how a leftist thinking works. Sean is ‘pocketing’ money NOT YET in someone else’s pockets …

Never mind THE FACT that the money wouldn’t even be there were it not for Sean’s efforts.

Do you disagree with this Dr(ibble) Steve?

Do you have any idea of the overhead the US Government imparts on money’s it collects then redistributes via welfare, Medicaid and Medicare and SSoc payments?

Any quibble with this? Any quibble with the way the IRS operates (force, intimidation, threat of jailtime et al)?

Signed: _Jim
.

_Jim on March 19, 2010 at 12:45 pm

    So you if you Hannity apologists gave Sean $1,000 for wounded troops, you’d be perfectly fine with him pocketing $900 of it for his own personal use? Wow. Where can I get that same sort of idolatry? Amazing how you people think.

    Craig on March 19, 2010 at 1:14 pm

    So if you Hannity apologists donated $1,000 for injured troops, you’d be fine with Sean pocketing $900 of it for his own personal use? Wow, where can I get that same sort of idolatry?

    Craig on March 19, 2010 at 1:17 pm

    > Sean is ‘pocketing’ money NOT YET in someone else’s pockets …

    Not EVER. Don’t you get it? The money paid for printing, postage, consultants, luxury jets and hotels will NEVER make it to the intended recipients. The money has left the building.

    > Never mind THE FACT that the money wouldn’t even be there were it not for Sean’s efforts.

    Why? Because his listeners wouldn’t have donated at all without him? Are they too stupid to find any other organization to give to? or too loyal to start their own? or too disconnected to find a local soldier’s family and give directly? That latter is exactly %100 efficient. No concerts, no consultants and no bullshit.

    So think about it. If people were moved to donate for the right reasons, how many of them would have found a way to make it happen? If it is more than %7, then Hannity is hurting the cause he professes to represent. All he has to do is find one legitimate non-scam of a charity and promote that.

    But for what you said to be a FACT, then it would have to be that NONE of the concertgoers would have donated UNLESS Hannity asked them to. I hope that with it stated that way, it sounds as ridiculous to you as it does to me.

    > Any quibble with the way the IRS operates (force, intimidation, threat of jailtime et al)?

    Any regulatory or law enforcement entity operates with the same implied and explicit force of law. That’s what it means to have a government and the rule of law. (Please don’t start off on the income tax being illegal.)

    Joe A. on March 19, 2010 at 6:50 pm

Scary, isn’t it, how quickly some people leap to defend their idols? Look at the comments being made here — people are accusing Ms. Schlussel of everything under the sun, rather than accept the facts as she presents them. I’m a “libtard” who was recommended to this page from a left-wing website, but there’s nothing partisan about real journalism being practiced, and that’s what this is. Kudos, Ms. Schlussel. If more people actually did research and followed where the story led like this, instead of following tabloid nonsense like Tiger Woods, the American press would be truly worthy of the First Amendment.

Clavis on March 19, 2010 at 12:48 pm

A personal attack?? (I don’t care if she was blowing him everyday and then suddenly she didn’t like him anymore) if he is doing what they say he is doing, it’s Sad. Are you people all RETARDED!! This man has done nothing but fly his family all over the country in luxury for free concerts… On peoples generosity for soldiers who were killed in the line of duty… I dont care if it was a Republican or a Democrate…That’s disgusting!! It has nothing to do what party you belong tooo!! You MORON!!

Larry on March 19, 2010 at 1:01 pm

Would you like butter with that toast?

Bill on March 19, 2010 at 1:01 pm

Gary, this isn’t about some $10 that Vannity may or may not have given to this cause. It’s about all the $10’s that his hoodwinked fans have given “to the cause” only to have 70 cents reach those for whom the $10 was intended.

It’s also about Vannity outright lying about the supposed worthiness of this scam and the amount that he and his butt-buddies rake off the top.

I am very careful about the donations I make to charities and try to give as close to the source as possible. I expect 85 to 90 percent of what I give to get to the ultimate recipients. Vannity’s so-called “charity” wouldn’t even make it onto my radar screen.

This guy is nothing but a grifter . . . just like Failin’ Palin and the rest of the con artists who share the stage with him.

Bo on March 19, 2010 at 1:02 pm

To all the conservative whiners here:

Sometimes the truth hurts.

baldski on March 19, 2010 at 1:04 pm

I think the point is that for an organisation to be considered a charity, doesn’t their charitble output have to be over 70%of the money you take in?

I think it’s damn near illegal to pocket that much money, yet claim tax exemption and be considered a charity. That just makes it begging….

Hikaru on March 19, 2010 at 1:09 pm

*Correction

orginization

Hikaru on March 19, 2010 at 1:13 pm

Yeppers. Even the “consider the source” defense doesn’t work in this instance. After all, Debbie isn’t exactly a wild-eyed liberal!

If this kind of criticism is coming from a Zionista like little Debbie, I’d call that a credible source. The conservative whining that her investigation has produced is just one more example of the terminal disease that plagues the right-wing teabaggin’ movement — denial of reality.

Bo on March 19, 2010 at 1:13 pm

A similar search of The Jackie Robinson Foundation (a foundation named for a great man and dedicated to schlarships for minorities) indicated that it has Assets of $25M+ and gave only $1.6M in grants for the year 2008.

Are you going to investigate why? Charities do have overhead and guess what? They don’t give all their assets away every year if they want to stay a charity that can give in the future.

Before you indicate that Mr. Hannity is skimming off the top of the charity you might want to note he is not a trustee or even on the Board of Directors. You might also want to refrain from such inflammatory rhetoric until you have proof he is skimming.

What you have shown is only that the charity is apparently not run very efficiently. Guess what? MANY are not run efficiently.

Tracey on March 19, 2010 at 1:15 pm

    tracey said: “A similar search of The Jackie Robinson Foundation (a foundation named for a great man and dedicated to schlarships for minorities) indicated that it has Assets of $25M+ and gave only $1.6M in grants for the year 2008.”

    Assets are not the same as income. Say for example, that JRF has $25M in assets, that they have invested and that earns 10% on those investments in the year 2008. They gave out 1.6M in grants. That would be an efficieny rating of 64%. Now I have no idea what the JRF actually had in income for 2008; one could get that info from their IRS filings, but you shouldn’t confuse a charity’s assets for the yearly income. Some of these assets may have been met to be used to build up their endowement.

    gearguy on March 19, 2010 at 1:54 pm

_Jim needs a job, or should at least be using company time to check out March Madness scores like the rest of us “Great Americans”.
Get a life _Jim, go teabag somebody!

BillyR on March 19, 2010 at 1:24 pm

Tracey, there’s a big difference between the Jackie Robinson Foundation and Vannity’s scam.

The Robinson Foundation has a $25 million corpus dedicated to support its mission and proceeds from it are used to make grants. That means that the $25 million will continue to produce revenue into the future to benefit the target population for its charitable work — not line the pockets of “consultants”, etc.

Vannity’s scam is a cash-and-carry grift. Seven cents of “current contributions” goes to the supposed beneficiaries; 93 cents goes into “fund-raising”. Period.

Big difference.

Bo on March 19, 2010 at 1:27 pm

This comment thread is the funniest thing I have seen all year. I am a liberal. I came here because I heard about Ms. Schlussel’s investigative reporting, and I wanted to congratulate her on having the integrity to call out her own party (just as Dems with integrity should call out sketchy characters like Charlie Rangel). I read through some of Ms. Schlussel’s other posts and can safely say that I find her opinions abhorrent, but I can still respect that she’s at least honest about not liking fraud.

But what’s funny here is the number of people who are in total denial about this scheme. People calling Ms. Schlussel a liberal (which the rest of this site indicates she’s most definitely not), or insulting her, or just even saying there’s nothing wrong with having a charity that spends 0.36 cents per dollar taken in on its state mission. Isn’t the conservative position that we don’t need any government social spending, and private charities will take up the slack to make sure the poor and downtrodden don’t starve? Well, if all the charities work like Hannity’s that plan is certainly not viable.

So what I’ve learned from this sad situation:

1. my suspicions concerning Hannity’s perfidy were correct, he really is scum.
2. many people on the right are so wedded to the media personalities who feed them their talking points that they can’t accept when those people are blatant hypocrites, even if the facts are right in front of them. sad, really.

oh, and no point replying, righties, because I’m never coming here again.

But again, it’s nice to see someone with integrity, Ms. Schlussel, even if I think you’re wrong about almost everything.

Josef on March 19, 2010 at 1:28 pm

    Poor Josef. Maybe he should actually read the comments. There are plenty of Vannity apologists here. There also plenty of conservatives who are thanking Debbie for her work. Just like a leftist not to see the whole picture.

    skzion on March 20, 2010 at 10:01 am

“Never mind THE FACT that the money wouldn’t even be there were it not for Sean’s efforts.”

Of course the money would be there: the charity didn’t create this money out of thin air. This is other people’s money, that they are donating to send to the troops and their kids. If the charity wasn’t there, this money could go to the troops by other charities.

People seem to be defending the charity on the grounds that it magnanimously gives SOME money to the troops. But that’s a misunderstanding of what a charity is. The charity doesn’t GIVE any money at all; YOU give the money, and the charity routes it to people—while skimming off a percentage for operations.

If they suck away more than half the money for consulting or whatever, the fact that they don’t suck it all doesn’t make them wonderful people.

xcott on March 19, 2010 at 1:30 pm

    Exactly. It’s not like there aren’t other charities out there, albeit with slightly lesser known artists/representatives.

    No matter what intentions Sean may have, either of actually providing for troops etc, or promoting his self image, if you consider just how much money is being wasted it’s easy to realize alternatives to this venue are quite a bit better.

    Remember, the money donated does not come from Sean himself, but from the people who truly want to aid those who sacrificed for the US. And if the expense reports and taxation are to be believed, he’s not sacrificing a whole lot himself.

    Jenner on March 19, 2010 at 2:27 pm

Ms. Schlussel:

I am politically removed from you 180 degrees on about every issue you could name.

The few times I’ve looked at your web site prior to now did little more than raise my blood pressure, and left me sputtering insults I won’t repeat.

The only reason I even looked at this column was due a link from a fellow leftie via Facebook.

This time, though… you’re positively wonderful. I hope your column gets attention from the media.

MDB on March 19, 2010 at 1:30 pm

Fix news will spin this story

Herman on March 19, 2010 at 1:35 pm

I dont get why all you cons have this secret crush on Sean Hannity. Y’all should be a little embarrassed for yourselves.

Superleft on March 19, 2010 at 1:35 pm

the real Scam- Hannity works for the Saudis who own a major share of Fox News. FOX NEWS- brought to you by the same country that gave us the 9-11 terrorists!!!

Superleft on March 19, 2010 at 1:44 pm

Debbie, I’m glad you pointed this out. I’ve always considered Hannity to be such a fraud, and never understood his appeal at all. He is neither funny nor is even close to being smart. He is just an endless chasm of (the same) talking points. It’s like he has read one history book in his entire life (like, The Life and Times of Ronald Reagan), never finished it, and continues to pull quotes from the Cliffs Notes.

We won tickets to this concert last year and just being there was enormously embarrassing. It was embarrassing to see troops and their children being paraded around on stage as props.

I can’t listen to him or watch his show, and he is one of the aspects of the conservative “movement” that I hate- that people consider him a leader. What I also hate is that respectable, smart people go on his show and (supposedly) take him seriously…I always think -” there’s no way they take Hannity seriously”.

This guy has never read a primary source document in his life; has never read Burke or the Federalist Papers or de tocqueville or anything of substance…

He is a joke- whether this story is true or not…

Off my chest..

Frank on March 19, 2010 at 1:59 pm

I might believe the charges against Sean Hannity, if and when I hear it from a credible source. Bloggers are not credible sources.

Keith on March 19, 2010 at 2:06 pm

    Why don’t you just look up the information yourself. It’s all accessible. Do you have to be told everything?

    Elwood on March 19, 2010 at 2:27 pm

    What’s credible for you, Keith? Human Events? Worldnet Daily? NY Post? Hannity.com? Listen, these allegations aren’t new (Daily Kos had this in 2007 as did other sources) and nor are they at all surprising. Hopefully, this leads to the downfall of this bloviating hypocritical assclown.

    timmy t on March 19, 2010 at 3:09 pm

Great article. It’s not only Mr. Hannity that needs to be “looked into”. People are being robbed blind by several “charities” that benefit all but the folks that need help.

sandy on March 19, 2010 at 2:08 pm

The aviation service, New World Aviation, that Hannity used has an instructive description of itself on its website:

“You’ve achieved a status in life many people aspire to, yet very few attain, and we’re here to ensure your expectations are met – even exceeded – as you take to the air.

“At New World Aviation, we combine a passion for flight with an unparalleled level of luxurious service to create a traveling experience unto itself. Whether you’re flying business or pleasure, across town or across continents, you now have an aviation company focused solely on providing you with the amenities, professionalism and personal attention you expect and deserve. We just provide ours at a slightly higher level-about 45,000 feet.”

Bill Black on March 19, 2010 at 2:14 pm

The Hannitty defenders saying that he has done a lot of good miss the point that he hasn’t done a lot of good. Giving $1000 or less to families that are now struggling because of a war that was started fraudently when leading people to believe the families are going to get much more is hypocrisy, immoral and unethical. Obviously those defending Hannitty know nothing about true conservatism and don’t care about morality and ethics. Donating a mere $800,000 out of $10 million is a crime against all that is moral and ethical and what this country is suppose to stand for. This is not what the Founding Fathers intended.

Midwest_in_Monterey on March 19, 2010 at 2:19 pm

Good job, Debbie.

Now, will the lefties visiting this site today from DKos et al (I’m one of you) please start looking at bloviating asses like Michael Moore under the same spotlight? This is not a left or right issue. It’s common as dirt across the board — ask any charity what they have to go through to get a celeb to sign on to their auction / gala / whatever.

Lushlife on March 19, 2010 at 2:22 pm

    Lushlife,

    Before I start investigating Michael Moore, please tell me for which charity he works. Or what I should be looking for?

    alex milstein on March 19, 2010 at 3:57 pm

      [Lushlife,

      Before I start investigating Michael Moore, please tell me for which charity he works. Or what I should be looking for?
      – alex milstein ]

      Irrelevant, alex. Fraud isn’t limited to charities. The general question is whether leftists like yourself can at least be leftists with integrity. Or do you so passionately need to idolize liars who happen to say things you like? The latter is likely. A conservative practices conservatism by uncovering frauds like Vannity. A leftist practices leftism by BEING fraudulent.

      skzion on March 20, 2010 at 10:10 am

sad. more sad than angry at this story. to take advantage of people like our soldiers and their families is just. . .well anyway on a positive note. one REAL charity that everyone can contribute to help or troops is the uso. http://www.uso.org/

Reggie on March 19, 2010 at 2:25 pm

DS- If this is accurate- I am glad you are standing up on principal rather than a party or platform. I’ll say this being a liberal- both sides- including the Dems- need to toss out the bad apples in both their respective carts.

sbh on March 19, 2010 at 2:29 pm

It will be interesting to see if Vannity even responds to this developing scandal on his TV or radio rant-fest. If he does, I am virtually certain that he will play the “victim card”. That is his regular response when he’s been found out.

In his defense, I suppose it needs be said that the Freedom Concerts really aren’t about aiding military families. They are all about Vannity’s self-promotion and stroking his butt-buddies on the right wing. Military families are only one of the props he uses to keep his fans entertained and distracted, to sell books and to spread his message . . . kind of like the way that Failin’ Palin carries Trig around like a loaf of bread for her public appearances.

Bo on March 19, 2010 at 2:39 pm

sean has always been a double talker. he used to blast hugo chavez every day. i saw him numerous times in his escalade fueling up at what was the citgo in cold spring harbor. i was going to snap pics with my cell phone camera, but didn’t want him to think i was taking a fan pic. im more conservative than the next guy and his sappy big headed, apple pie and motherhood routine is f’ing ponderous!!!

erocker on March 19, 2010 at 2:49 pm

WHY DON’T ALL OF YOU CONSERVATIVES GO SUCK HANNITY’S D*&K!!!!

TINA on March 19, 2010 at 2:52 pm

It would’ve been *really* easy for me to have gone on a legendary tirade against Hannity, here. Reaaaaally easy.

But I think it’s more constructive to give Debbie a pat on the back for taking the responsibility for policing her ‘own side’ (for lack of a better term), and for all of us to hold ourselves to a similar standard. Well done, Debbie.

Mike on March 19, 2010 at 2:54 pm

Wow, this be the same woman who called for the death of watchmen fans? (ok, I have grievences with the movie, but fans do not deserve to die) I wonder how Hannity is going to handle this.Is there jailtime for this?

ThanatosRW on March 19, 2010 at 2:55 pm

Sean Vhannity is a fraud.
What’s new?

Thor on March 19, 2010 at 3:14 pm

i sure miss you on the Howard Stern show Debbie and thank you for showing the people what a true scam artist this guy really is

pete luzzi on March 19, 2010 at 3:14 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field