March 18, 2010, - 5:46 am

Sean Hannity’s Freedom CONcert Scam: Almost None of Charity’s $ Went to Injured Troops, Kids of Fallen Troops; G5s for Vannity?

By Debbie Schlussel

***  UPDATE, 4/5/10:  Responding to Schlussel Expose, Charity Navigator Downgrades Hannity Charity: Freedom Alliance Rating Now Only 2 Stars (”Needs Improvement”) ***

**** Check out my UPDATES to this story: 03/25/10 – Big Business: Who Owns the Freedom Concerts? How Sean Hannity’s Private Jets, Luxe SUVs, Suites Were Paid & 03/24/10 – Semantics of Vannity: New Hannity Soldiers Scam – “Buy My Book, (Non-Existent) Profits Go to Troops Charity” ****

****03/19/10:  SCROLL DOWN FOR UPDATE: My Response to Freedom Alliance’s/Oliver North’s Weak “Non-Response” & New Lies  ****

For the last several years, Sean Hannity and the Freedom Alliance “charity” have conducted “Freedom Concerts” across America. They’ve told you that they are raising money to pay for the college tuition of the children of fallen soldiers and to pay severely wounded war vets.  And on Friday Night, Hannity will be honored with an award for this “Outstanding Community Service by a Radio Talk Show Host” at Talkers Magazine’s  convention.

But it’s all a huge scam.

freedomconcerthannity

In fact, less than 20%–and in two recent years, less than 7% and 4%, respectively–of the money raised by Freedom Alliance went to these causes, while millions of dollars went to expenses, including consultants and apparently to ferry the Hannity posse of family and friends in high style. And, despite Hannity’s statements to the contrary on his nationally syndicated radio show, few of the children of fallen soldiers got more than $1,000-$2,000, with apparently none getting more than $6,000, while Freedom Alliance appears to have spent tens of thousands of dollars for private planes.  Moreover, despite written assurances to donors that all money raised would go directly to scholarships for kids of the fallen heroes and not to expenses, has begun charging expenses of nearly $500,000 to give out just over $800,000 in scholarships.

In February 2009, a well-known conservative writer sent me this, about a friend at FOX News:

The guy went on to tell me about Hannity’s “Freedom Concerts,” which are staged across the country with the proceeds going to children of slain soldiers. Of course, as the guy tells it, there’d be a lot more money every concert to go to the cause if Hannity didn’t demand–and get–use of a Gulfstream 5 plane to fly him and his family/entourage to the concerts; a “fleet” (that’s the word the guy used) of either Cadillac or Lincoln SUVs for him and his family/entourage; and several suites at really expensive hotels for him and his family/entourage. The promoter apparently values Hannity’s star demands at well over $200,000 per event. The source says he heard that Oliver North pulled Hannity aside at one of the concerts and told him that this had to stop. But that may mean that, from now on, Hannity has to fly on a G4 instead of a G5, gets only a few luxury SUVs, and two or three suites.

North is the founder and honorary chairman of Freedom Alliance.

I began investigating these claims, and lo and behold, I discovered that Freedom Alliance gives very little money to the children of slain troops to pay for college and even less to wounded troops.  The stories of injuries to troops and how much Freedom Alliance gives them–$200 for a soldier from a poor neighborhood who lost three limbs–is heartbreaking.  Soldiers with traumatic brain injuries, severe wounds to the face from disfiguring burns and explosions, and multiple amputations got $1,000 or less, with only a handful of exceptions.

The tax forms available to the public for the Freedom Alliance–for the years 2006-2008–paint a tragic story, a story of a charity that makes gazillions and spends very little for the purposes it claims, a charity that spends millions more on its small staff and crony consultants than it ever gives in scholarships to the children of the fallen or severely injured troops or in aid to the injured troops themselves.  While Hannity’s Freedom Concerts take in millions, only a few hundred thousand go to the claimed intended recipients.

Over a year ago, when I began looking into this story, I contacted both Sean Hannity and the Freedom Alliance seeking comment and an accounting for where the money went.  Both declined to answer any of my questions.  Hannity refused to respond to an inquiry I sent to his personal private e-mail address asking him about the lavish expenses described in the e-mail above.

Freedom Alliance press secretary Alan Moore scheduled an interview for me with Freedom Alliance president Thomas Kilgannon, who in the past used Freedom Alliance resources to promote a book he wrote on the United Nations.  But when Moore asked me what the interview would be about and I answered truthfully, the interview was not granted, and my calls to him were never returned thereafter.  I told him I’d be asking Mr. Kilgannon about the expenses paid for Hannity and about the paltry percentage of Freedom Alliance funds actually going to the kids of fallen troops, to severely injured troops, and to anything other than expenses, consultants, and printing.  I wanted to know why Freedom Alliance had spent $60,000 for “aviation services” in 2006.

Keep in mind that a charity is considered reputable if no more than 25% of its revenue goes to expenses and no less than 75% of it goes to the intended charity recipients.  Given that, Freedom Alliance’s balance sheets are embarrassing in their shamelessness.

According to its 2006 tax returns, Freedom Alliance reported revenue of $10, 822, 785, but only $397,900–or a beyond-measly 3.68%–of that was given to the children of fallen troops as scholarships or as aid to severely injured soldiers.

On the other hand, 62% of the money went to “expenses,” including $979,485 for “consultants” and an “advisor.” Yes, consultant/advisors got more than double what injured troops and the kids of fallen troops got. The tax forms show that “New World Aviation” got paid $60,601 for “air travel.” Was that for Hannity’s G5? Like I said, neither the charity nor Hannity is talking. And finally, that year, Freedom Alliance spent $1,730,816 on postage and shipping and $1,414,215 on printing, for a total of $3,145,031, nearly half the revenue the charity spent that year and about eight times what the injured troops and the children of fallen ones received.

That’s especially heartbreaking when you compare the hundreds of thousands consultants got and the millions spent on printing and postage to the outrageously small amounts given to wounded soldiers. In 2006, Freedom Alliance gave only $1,000 to a soldier from Bay City, Michigan, whom the charity says was in the following condition:

Face was blown up and lost sight in one eye.

And that $1,000 was relatively generous, when you consider this soldier from Romulus, Michigan, whom Freedom Alliance only gave $200:

SM [serviceman] was involved in roadside bomb incident in Iraq, which caused loss of both legs and left arm.

Romulus is a mostly Black Detroit suburb, which is one of the poorest cities in Michigan and in America. Freedom Alliance gave this brave soldier roughly $67 per limb. That’s sickening.

So is the fact that this soldier, from Alexandria, Virginia, also only got $200 from Freedom Alliance:

SM was wounded in Iraq by an IED explosion.  Lost right arm and severe shrapnel wounds to upper body and face.

Also appalling is the fact that in each year’s tax returns soldiers described as having brain trauma injuries, multiple amputated limbs, and severe burns over most of their bodies get a few hundred bucks each from Freedom Alliance and in almost every case, no more than $1,000.

That year, while fat-cat consultants and expenses took millions of Freedom Alliance’s money, seriously wounded troops to whom Freedom Alliance donated received a pathetic average of $785 each and the college student kids of the fallen got a paltry average of $2,943 toward tuition. Yes, out of millions raised that year by Sean Hannity at his Freedom Concerts, only $309,000 was given out in scholarships to 105 students, and only $110,703.82 was given to the wounded soldiers.

Freedom Alliance’s 2007 tax returns aren’t much better. Out of $12,459,317 it raised that year, only $895,347–or just 7%–went to seriously wounded troops and scholarships for fallen troops. 53% went to expenses, including $1,464,627 in postage and $1,151,428 in printing. $604,995 went to “professional fees” and “consultants.” Out of millions paid for Freedom Concert tickets and raised in fundraisers by Hannity listeners, only $596,500 went to college scholarships for soldiers who died in battle, and only $299,897 went to horribly injured troops. 208 student children of the fallen got an average of $2,868 apiece for tuition, though many got only $1,000 or less. 382 soldiers with serious injuries got an average of $785 each.

And, again, that year, the amounts given to soldiers with such grave injuries is despicably tiny. This soldier, from Killeen, Texas, got only $500 from Freedom Alliance:

SM was wounded in Iraq on June 18, 2007 in Digula Province, Baquba, Iraq. An IED exploded on the truck, he took shrapnel to the face, which cut off a piece of his nose. Also had shrapnel in throat and cheeks, which cut open his face and the inside of his throat.

This soldier, from Brady, Texas, also received just $500 from Freedom Alliance:

While serving in Baghdad Iraq, SM was hit with an IED blast. Sustained disfigurement, blindness, and superficial burns on face, hearing loss to right ear, TBI, peppered shrapnel to the face and right upper extremity.

And then, there are the 2008 Freedom Alliance tax forms, which were signed in November 2009 and filed only recently.  That year, Freedom Alliance took in $8,781,431 in revenue and gave $1,060,275.57 total–or just 12%–to seriously wounded soldiers and for scholarships to kids of the fallen.  Remember, this is well below the 75% required to be considered a legitimate charity.  And after claiming in written letters to donors that 100% of the money donated, via the Freedom Concerts or otherwise, to the scholarships would go directly to the scholarships and not to expenses, the Freedom Alliance decided to do the contrary and charge expenses anyway–charging a whopping $436,386 to give out $802,250 in scholarships.  That means that 35% of the $1,238,636–all of which was supposed to go to scholarships for these kids of the fallen–went to Freedom Alliance.

Freedom Alliance spent $5,375,654–or 61% of its total revenue earned in 2008–on expenses, but actually 80% of the total revenue spent and given out for that year.  That includes $1,055,791 spent on postage and $925,392 on printing.  It spent $157,041 on travel.  Is this the item that includes the money for the alleged Sean Hannity Gulfstream flights?  Like I said, neither the charity nor Hannity will answer questions.

Meanwhile, 167 students got an average of just $4,803.89 each in tuition.  With the amount this charity raises, these kids should all be getting a free ride paid for by Freedom Alliance.

And 299 very seriously injured soldiers got an average of just $805.21 each for very grave injuries.  And the heartbreak of their stories and the disgustingly low amount donated to them continues.  This soldier, from Laurel, MD, got just $1,000:

SM lost both legs and one arm, below elbow, due to IED blast.  SM also lost hearing in both ears on April 21, 2008.

Wow, while Sean Hannity and his friends at Freedom Alliance are paying their crony consultants hundreds of thousands of dollars, they’re giving this soldier $200 per limb lost or rendered useless.

This soldier, from Fort Sam Houston, Texas (where my own father was first sent when he was drafted during Vietnam), fared even worse in Freedom Alliance’s “generosity,” receiving only $165:

SM is a bilateral amputee with 30% facial burns sustained during IED blast, 31 May 2008, OEF.

Just $165 for that?  Pathetic.  And so very tragic.

Since Sean Hannity is always bragging about his phony “investigations” (stuff he just rips off from others) and “investigative” skills, you’d think he could figure out how to read a tax return and bother to look at Freedom Alliance’s.  But you would be wrong.  He has neither the skills nor the desire.  He knows better and is well aware that they waste money on him and his luxe accommodations and travel.  But this isn’t about that or truly about helping the troops and the kids of our war dead.  It’s about promoting himself, the same way Angelina Jolie and Madonna get the press to film them in Africa.

To make matters worse, Hannity deliberately lied to his radio audience about how much money was going to the kids of the fallen American soldiers.  On May 28th of last year, Hannity told his listeners, “Our new sponsor, Boca Java, just pledged $30,000 to the Freedom Concerts.  That will provide a full one-year college scholarship for a kid of a fallen soldier.”  In fact, Freedom Alliance’s tax forms indicate it has never given any student more than $6,000 in a school year, and usually it’s been far less.  Many students only get $1,000, which will barely cover anything at most colleges, today.  A Boca Java spokeswoman told me that last year was the coffee purveyor’s last one sponsoring the Freedom Concerts, as it now donates directly to the troops, sending them free coffee and through sales of its Brew of Bravery.

A friend of mine was one of the artists who performed in Hannity’s Freedom Concerts and was shocked when I showed him the tax forms and the expenses.  He no longer performs at the concerts because he was tired of the egomania.  Now, he’s just angry.  “We paid our own way and for all of our costs and expenses to perform because we thought we were helping the troops and their families and that all the money was going to them.”

In investigating Freedom Alliance and its tax forms, I learned that the organizations which evaluate charities are entirely worthless.  Freedom Alliance is certified as “Best in America” by the “Independent Charities of America.”  It is also rated a “Four Star Charity” by “Charity Navigator.”  Both of these “ratings” are posted prominently on Freedom Alliance’s website, misleading donors into believing they are donating to a worthy cause, when in fact they are mostly donating to a black hole of expenses.  Even Charity Navigator notes in its strange, illogical, and mostly inaccurate Four Star rating that Freedom Alliance has a fund-raising “efficiency” of only nine cents on the dollar.  And, in fact, Charity Navigator’s ridiculous rating formula robotically crunches numbers in a way that considers the money spent mostly on consultants, postage, and printing as having gone to the wounded soldiers and kids of fallen soldiers, when in fact that’s not where it went at all.  It simply can’t be taken seriously.

And I’m not the only one who noticed.  The comments on Charity Navigator’s Freedom Alliance page are indicative that those who checked this charity’s tax forms also note the scam.

“Wonkling” wrote:

If you look at the actual 990, it breaks down its program expenses. They actually spent more money this past year on postage than they did over the past 4 years on scholarships. They paid 60k to an air company, millions to consultants, marketing, fundraising. Their actual expenditures on funds for children of killed/disabled veterans is far less than what they paid themselves or their consultants. Having a large capacity (4 stars) should not overshadow a cumbersome efficiency rating (2 stars).

“Chickenbone” wrote:

Since 2003 Freedom Alliance has collected in cash $48,241,571! Since 2003 they have spent on the Wounded and Dead Veterans and their Families $1,781,782 or .036 cents on the dollar, according to their own IRS 990’s!

Yes, Sean Hannity’s Freedom Concerts are just a giant con.  His gushing lumpenconservatariat fans and listeners actually believe he’s doing good, while he travels in style around the country feeding his ego.  It’s a win-win for him.  But it’s a lose-lose for the donors (who are mostly hard-working, Middle Americans who want to help our troops and their families and bought concert tickets and held other fundraisers) and mostly a loser for the kids of the fallen troops and the troops, themselves, who survived with very serious injuries.

You’ve heard the saying, “Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.”  I love patriotism, but in this case, Sean Hannity’s “Freedom Concerts” and the Freedom Alliance are Exhibit A of that saying.  But they’re not really patriots.  Not even close.  Their only patriotism is to the faces they see in their mirrors.  Hey, Sean, you’re a “Great American.”

Sadly, the real great Americans–the ones who gave their lives and the ones who survived but gave their limbs and their skin for this country–are getting ripped off.

****  UPDATE, 03/18/10:  Just as I expected, the liars and frauds at Freedom Alliance want to keep the gravy train going for them and their cronies.  So they’ve issued a “response,” which doesn’t refute a single fact in here and frankly provides no hard evidence of anything . . . because they don’t have any. One of the “prominent bloggers” who posted the phony response is Erick Erickson, a guy who supports Rand Paul and the other 9/11 Truther Paul, and who defended Emily Zanotti, the lunatic who has been stalking me for four years and who praised Muslim death, rape, and torture threats against me and my family.  Yes, sadly, there are a growing number of anti-Semites on the right, and Erick Erickson is one of them.  And the anti-Semites are now the defenders of this rip off of our seriously wounded troops and the kids of our fallen heroes.

Here is my response to their extremely weak PR attempt at CYA:

In fact, the Freedom Alliance “response” doesn’t answer any of the questions I raised and goes on to lie more. They don’t address why they gave a triple amputee only $200—and in fact there are many of these examples provided in their tax return addendum, but I only cited a few for brevity’s sake. They also lie and claim that they gave a lot more money to charity b/c they categorize it as “program expenses.” But I’m sorry—calling $3 million in consulting fees, printing, and postage “program expenses” doesn’t change the fact that it still went to their cronies, not to a fund and not the soldiers who only got on average less than $900 apiece. It also doesn’t change the fact that out of the money spent (I didn’t use the money they claim they raised for their scholarship fund) the vast majority goes to those kinds of expenses.

Also, the “scholarship fund” is really a war chest for something else. We’ve been at war since 2001, when we went into Afghanistan, and we’re winding down in Iraq. Unless the kids were born in 2001 or thereafter, many of these kids are in college now and Freedom Alliance is giving them a pittance toward their college tuition, while they continue to build this massive war chest. With a giant multi-million dollar fund, why aren’t they giving the kids a free, complete ride to college? And how many kids of deceased troops will there be in the future? Enough to exhaust a multi-million dollar fund? Doubtful.

Moreover, because they hoarded millions of dollars, their returns show the fund shrunk by several million dollars with bad investments and market losses. That money could have put these kids through college for the entire time. What’s their excuse for the soldiers with no limbs and with severe burns? Are they waiting for two decades from now when technology is better? $165 for a soldier who is blind and his face blew up? No excuse for that. Their “response” is simply a non-response and an attempt to cover up the fraud. I will be posting more on this and on more fraud at Freedom Alliance, in the coming days. Stay tuned.
DS

**** Check out my UPDATES to this story: 03/25/10 – Big Business: Who Owns the Freedom Concerts? How Sean Hannity’s Private Jets, Luxe SUVs, Suites Were Paid & 03/24/10 – Semantics of Vannity: New Hannity Soldiers Scam – “Buy My Book, (Non-Existent) Profits Go to Troops Charity” ****

***  UPDATE, 4/5/10:  Responding to Schlussel Expose, Charity Navigator Downgrades Hannity Charity: Freedom Alliance Rating Now Only 2 Stars (”Needs Improvement”) ***




Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


539 Responses

If this is fact I do not see how Sean Hannity will be able to stay on the air and as a disabled vet I am very concerned. I have never bought into the old saying that patritism is the first defense of a scoundrel. I am very patriotic and love my country and served it for many years. But I am very troubled by this.

Jack Hamilton on March 18, 2010 at 6:44 am

Hannity is a fake and a fraud. He is no better in my mind then Olympia Snowe. Take his raido show for example. Rmemeber when Obama took over GM? Hannity wan ranting and raving about how bad this was, how he was going to aviod Gm. Well that lasted until the first commercial break when I noticed a commercial for GM being voiced by none other then Sean himself.
For Conservative Radio stick to Mike Church ( http://www.mikechurch.com ), Andrew Wilkow http://www.Wilkowmajority.com , and Mark Levin

MF: Agreed 100% on Mike Church, who is great. But I’m surprised you like Vannity’s stooge, and Levin. Their slobbering over him could provide an adequate water supply for all of Africa. Remember, Levin only has a radio show b/c Vannity forcefeeds stations that buy his show to buy the subpar Levin drama-fest. DS

martin fee on March 18, 2010 at 7:15 am

This was quite disturbing….
It obviously begs the question, which ARE some reputable charities for our troops ??

Shootist on March 18, 2010 at 7:44 am

what a scumbag.

DS_ROCKS! on March 18, 2010 at 8:02 am

Debbie, you’ve done yourself proud with this magnificent muckraking. Especially noteworthy are your detailed research into and inclusion of the group’s own numbers from its returns. I guess hearing dozens of times a day that he’s great renders Hannity as subject to the “power corrupts …” aphorism as any politician. Shame that there’s this kind of rot in what purports to be the “conservative undergrond.”

You know the seven degrees of charity? This doesn’t even get him to the first rung!

[By the way, I gave up Hannity long ago and listen to James David Manning when I can.] I’m sure I speak for many of your readers when I say I’ll be watching for follow-up on this important story. Very well done!

Dernon Ruton on March 18, 2010 at 8:03 am

I always thought Hannity was a Scum Bag

Steve on March 18, 2010 at 8:16 am

This is very disturbing. The area of 501(c) scholarship funding is ripe for abuse.

Brian Cuban on March 18, 2010 at 8:31 am

Deb:

Several years ago, when you first told me that Sean Hannity was a dirt-bag, I didn’t believe you. There was this picture on google images of you and Sean looking like the best of friends. I didn’t understand at the time. Now that seems so long ago.

Over the past several years, you’ve demonstrated time and again that Sean Hannity is hardly the sincere conservative he would like us to believe in. Moreover, these aren’t isolated incidents.

I lost any doubt about Hannity’s phoniness a long time ago and it was because of your work. I’m convinced! … and thank you for speaking out.

Regards,

There is NO Santa Claus (aka TINSC)

There is NO Santa Claus on March 18, 2010 at 8:33 am

This was totally worth the wait! Thanks!

cirrus1701 on March 18, 2010 at 8:38 am

Very disappointing.

He’s also very stupid as this could well ruin his entire career.

Tempus Fugit on March 18, 2010 at 8:41 am

I only listen to Savage and Rush personally.

Tempus Fugit on March 18, 2010 at 8:43 am

I’ve never been a big Hannity fan. I can’t stand to listen to him on the radio. He sounds too fake to me and apparently he is.

BWR on March 18, 2010 at 9:16 am

Toys for tots is highly reputable, and the Marine Corps League Scholarship fund takes nothing in expenses, it’s completely volunteer. 100% of donated funds go to the intended recipients.

Kirk on March 18, 2010 at 9:17 am

yep, I was going to email you about yesterday about Hanntity’s show, it was gawd awful. Beck and Hannity’s teaparties/freedom concerts are shams! good work DS

linda on March 18, 2010 at 9:24 am

Thanks for the great investigative work,I’ll be sure to pass this on to everyone I know.

This is despicable.

ebayer on March 18, 2010 at 9:24 am

Great stuff, Debbie. I really do wonder how such a fraud could have endured so long.

skzion on March 18, 2010 at 9:33 am

He’s as bad as Wyclef Jean. If Hannity and Jean got together to raise money for a good cause, there’d be ZERO left but the time they’d taken their skim off the top.

OneScaredMomma on March 18, 2010 at 9:42 am

This is great stuff Deb.
He is not answering because he’s in CYA mode. Think he’ll get dropped and Beck will get his time slot.
He should be finished.

ward on March 18, 2010 at 9:46 am

Sorry, ain’t buying it. You’re really into attacking not only Hannity, but anyone or any guest that appears on Fox News.

So I beg to differ – what hangup do you hold against Fox News? Why don’t you blog on that? Is it because they aren’t having you on their channel?

Further, why hasn’t anyone on Fox News given you the time of day to talk about your gripes against them on the air?

SH: Your one-note, blind defense of FOX News anytime I point out valid criticisms is getting old. Ditto for your attacks on the messenger (me) because you can’t refute a single fact I’ve presented here. Virtually, all of your comments on this site are attacks on me and contribute nothing to the discussion. You defended Glenn Beck’s attack on Geert Wilders as a “fascist.” And when Rush Limbaugh was rushed to the hospital in Hawaii, and I posted well wishes for him, you attacked me for claiming he’s only worthy of my wishes because he’s Jewish (which will be news to Rush who is not Jewish). Please get a clue. It will come in handy in life and actually allow you to make a valid point. You have yet to make one.

Of course, FOX News won’t ask me to come on to give my “gripes” about them on the air. What network does that? Your question is brainless. Do you really think they’re going to present news on the air that one of their star personalities is actually a scammer and liar? Did they play the O’Reilly phone sex tapes? Come on. Even you are not that dense. Strike that. Maybe you are. Clearly, attacking me and defending frauds is more important to you than severely injured troops and the kids of fallen troops actually getting the money that hard-working, decent Americans intended they’d get. DS

Steve Harkonnen on March 18, 2010 at 9:53 am

    Why are you switching the discussion to being about FOX News?

    Stay on topic.

    This article has nothing to do about FOX news.Save your FOX News comments for those articles,which have been many.

    ebayer on March 18, 2010 at 10:46 am

Dear Steve – Not that Debbie is unable to speak up for herself but… she has been quite honest adn clear over the years about her take on FOX. Having been extra watchful now, I have to agree with her. The Murdoch and House of Saud ownership set up has definitely impacted on the reporting. There is no question that there is an increase in censorship adn anti-Semitic sentiment in my opinion. My opinion is the one that matters when i am deciding what to watch. If you are ok with FOX, good for you. If you like Hannity, that’s your biz but the documents speak for themselves re: Hannity’s “charity.”

OneScaredMomma on March 18, 2010 at 10:19 am

If Hannity won’t return emails and phone calls, perhap Mr. O’Keefe could expose shame charities as his next gotcha that Fox likes to broadcast from Breitbart.

Terry on March 18, 2010 at 11:01 am

The numbers speak for themselves.

Let’s see who picks up the ball from Debbie’s kick-off…and let’s hear from Sean Hannity on justification of all that personal spending.

Meanwhile, praying for the asteroid.

Sylvia on March 18, 2010 at 11:02 am

In the immortal words of Bob Grant, radio’s first conservative, Hannity “is a fake, phony and fraud.” The fact of the matter is that Fox has nothing to do with this story. Hannity got his start on radio and I think he is mostly syndicated on ABC. I gave up on him some time ago and listen to Steve Malzberg in NYC instead.

Charles Steinberg on March 18, 2010 at 11:14 am

I can’t wait for the lefties to get ahold of this information. Fox won’t broadcast this info, but I am sure all of the leftie media will have a field day. I think I am going to send the link to this page to the White House and anybody else that would like to have at it with Vannity. Let the fun begin!

For all of his efforts while in the Marines, I salute Col. North. I served during the 80’s when he was doing his duty and serving this country with honor and distinction. I don’t know Col. North, but I can almost guarentee you that he doesn’t need any more than 5% of Vannity’s disgusting budget, if anything. I actually mean Vannity’s THEFT of charity money.

It seems that Vannity requires so much money for these CONcerts that everybody else involved would need to fly on C-130s and car pool in mini vans to the events.

Jarhead on March 18, 2010 at 11:21 am

if this is true. then Hannity is no different then nancy pelosi and her flying around on the taxpayers dime. This is true hypocracy and sickening.. Debbie its time this is blown wide open! send it to MSNBC… i hate that network but you know they will blowq this wide open!

mark mallia on March 18, 2010 at 11:25 am

Another point – Why can’t Vannity foot the bill for his entourage? If he is so charitable and in full support of our troops he would do this. He is a multi-millionaire from just one year’s worth of work. It really makes you think how much of a great American he is. People should start calling his show and say “Hannity, you are just a Great American Fraud”.

Jarhead on March 18, 2010 at 11:40 am

Wow. This is very disturbing. I thought Sean Hannity would know better.

No wonder you call him Sean Vannity. The name fits. I am very disappointed. There are a lot of hard truths learned on this website. I’m grateful of that.

Principals and values do mean something!

Skunky on March 18, 2010 at 11:57 am

BOOOOOOOOO!! This is sickening. VERY sickening. You would expect this from a liberal faux charity, but when it’s a conservative it really stings. Hannity should be ashamed. I will never watch him again. I have always viewed him with skepticism after catching his radio show in NY before he hit it big nationally. He spent hours accusing a man sodomized by cops using a plunger causing horrific injuries of being gay and getting the injuries from rough anal sex…. until the cops pled guilty and admitted it. He had proven to be more into entertainment and self promotion than conservative activism.

I say we flood Fox with emails demanding that Hannity provide an accounting, an explanation, an apology and/or be taken off the air. We need to police our own when conservatives do stuff like this.

Kaiser Sozay on March 18, 2010 at 11:59 am

I checked Charity Navigator. The $.09 mean that it takes $.09 for very dollar in charity. The lower the number the better. They got 3 stars for efficiency because they put many of these personal costs into program expenses that gave them fairly percent into program expenses although only 4 stars. One of the comments did say that 990 is suspicious. Sadly Charity navigator just crunches the numbers. And has rating for the various numbers. All 3 comments posted do expose that the 990 is misleading. Which I think Charity Navigator should have some other factor’s other then just the RAW NUMBERS which they don’t. If comments are alerting them that the 990 is misleading as is the cases of many of the PROGRAM EXPENSES they should look into it and have part of the rating be subjective.

adam on March 18, 2010 at 11:59 am

Wow. Nice job DS. Very depressing to learn this about Sean Hannity.

Cameron Reddy on March 18, 2010 at 12:01 pm

God.. I just hate when this stuff happens…I am not a Hannity fan, he gets on my nerves. But if he calls himself a conservative, well okay then, whatever..

The conservatives and so called conservatives know damn well what the media does to us.. So why would anyone ever put themselves in a position to be chastised by the left? I just don’t get it… It’s like any number of people who for whatever reason just cannot keep their lives intact.

sharon on March 18, 2010 at 12:07 pm

There will be serious repercussions as a result of this story. If factually true, Hannity will be in serious trouble, however, if not, his lawyers will have a field day with it. For your sake, Debbie, I hope you have not relied on someone else’s info and have checked and rechecked every accusatory word in your piece. This could well be the $hitstorm of the month.

SB: PUH-LEEZE. Did you bother to read the column? As I repeatedly noted, everything is taken directly from the tax forms of this organization. Hello . . .? I’m a lawyer. I don’t make up stuff and make myself vulnerable to valid lawsuits. For your sake, I wish you’d take a course in reading comprehension before raising the phony “allegation” that I “relied on someone else’s info.” Oh, and thanks for the high school journalism 101 tips on “checking and rechecking.” Yeah, I just posted anything without checking, just for the heck of blowing my credibility. Is that really what you think? My solid research on this took a lot of time and effort, unlike your haphazard reading of this and accusations. And ask yourself why neither the charity nor Vannity would answer questions. His lawyers won’t go near me . . . unless they want the embarrassment to be even bigger for him. DS

Syd B. on March 18, 2010 at 12:21 pm

The man has a good thing going. Mind-boggling why he’d blow it all just for a few perks he could easily forego or pay himself.

I don’t actually disagree with Hannity on much, I’m just not into his hokey, repetitive slogans, celebrity butt-kissing and such.

Tempus Fugit on March 18, 2010 at 12:39 pm

I tried posting Deb’s link on Hannity’s FB fan page. It was immediately blocked. Even more disgusting.

Kaiser Sozay on March 18, 2010 at 12:41 pm

Unfortunately appearances are everything, even if the response to them might be overwrought. Here are some observations from me about the charity world, which may or may not fit to this particular case. They are random thoughts; in no particular order; a mixed bag. Some might be thought of as exculpatory some don’t apply one way or the other but might provide some perspective.

1) None of the vendors are working for free nor are the venues free. Is that Sean Hannity’s fault or the charity? Maybe they should try for better deals but the gaffers, riggers, technicians, security people, sanitation people, the spots to run the ads to get people to show up, the ad agencies are under no obligation to provide service and rarely do because every bleeding heart charity in the world would be shaking the tin cup at them. And the way municipalities regulate these things, insurance requirements, sanitation, security etc., often at union scale, well a lot of expense is built in and none of those are free.

2) Do they keep the ticket prices comparatively low . . . would the traffic bear more ticket price that would increase the profit going to the scholarships? What would Debra do differently to make such events successfully come together.???

3) Over the term of its existence I believe a charity should strive to have 75% or more of its income go to charitable purpose. For most start -ups without a cash outlay sugar daddy for every event that is impossible. Many charitable events are lucky to break even.

4) There are left leaning charities with these sort of problems.

5) Schlussel is working off the 990, which has a questionable relationship to reality. What is charity or program expense and what is overhead is subject to logical interpretation, unfortunately logic does not necessarily enter into arbitrary law and regulation. Hard accounting rules may apply but they may not be logical. Charitable fund accounting is sometimes more art than reality. What is charitable purpose and what isn’t is open to a lot of reasonable interpretation.

6) Advertising for the event is either forgone income or might be considered contribution in kind. If Sean wanted to pump up the numbers to make himself look better he could counter her criticisms by saying he has donated millions (or X dollars) in advertising.

7) These are whirl wind tours that take tremendous logistics to come off. The varied talents are not necessarily paying their own expenses, probably do not, and have to fit it in between other gigs and that requires airplanes. In fact if their out of pocket expenses and other expenses were not covered they would not be able to attend.

8) Venue regs often work against the possibility of donated services.

9) Nothing stops the people attending from donating more to the charity, kicking in an extra ten-spot per person for example. That would flip the income figure and Schlussel would have no gee wiz case. People get all warm and fuzzy thinking they they did a wonderful thing by attending a concert at average or less cost put on by their fave entertainers but do not appreciate or pony up for the logistics involved. In other words nothing stops people from donating more than the real costs.

10) Perhaps the charity should not bill it as a fund-raising event per se nor limit its purposes to the scholarships. Call it a lecture with entertainment about the value of patriotism and support for the war on terror they certainly did that and to me that is a charitable purpose fulfilled. In addition to that money over those expenses will go to the scholarships. Then they may be able to book the lecture expenses as program expense and the donations for scholarships as additional program expense and then they are not as vulnerable to ignorant cheap shot artists but the actual numbers do not change.

11) It is not unusual that people involved in charities draw the line and say I will donate my time and talent but I cannot or will not donate out of pocket. For example “I have a gig in Dallas and you want me in Atlanta . . . I can maybe do it but I need a dedicated airplane.” The charity has a chose to make. Forgo the “talent” and possibly have a less attended event even though many of the expenses may be fixed, or downgrade everything and the amount to the scholarships is no different.

12) That a charity is not a successful charity per se does not mean it is not attempting a valid or valiant effort. Donors can and should ask questions and the charity should be forthright with potential donors.

TC: Nice try with all of your excuses (none of which hold water) for this multi-million dollar charity rip-off perpetrated by Sean Vannity and Freedom Alliance against well-meaning, hard-working Americans. FYI, Freedom Alliance isn’t just starting out. It’s been around since 1990 and has millions of dollars in assets. And just love your excuse that they lied on their taxes, so I can’t use the taxes to judge. Flippin’ hilarious. Clearly, you are on the Freedom Alliance staff. And definitely you earned a BS in BS. DS

two cents on March 18, 2010 at 12:49 pm

    “Over the term of its existence I believe a charity should strive to have 75% or more of its income go to charitable purpose. For most start -ups without a cash outlay sugar daddy for every event that is impossible. Many charitable events are lucky to break even.”

    If that is indeed the case then people are better off contacting their local school guidance counselor or social worker to identify a child of need and send that child money directly. Further, this just lends more credence to the argument that these charities are nothing more than marketing campaigns for the spokesperson, i.e. Sean Hannity, to inflate the public view of him and bolster his TV ratings. DISGRACEFUL!

    Musiccgirl on March 18, 2010 at 1:11 pm

    C’mon, two cents. The people supposedly being helped are not much helped, if at all. The people who are supposed to be helping are getting luxury service and help for their career. You can blab about technical possibilities till the cows come home, but you can’t explain the facts on the ground.

    skzion on March 18, 2010 at 2:31 pm

    So, what are you basically saying? Do you either agree or disagree with the charges DS is making? Translate your 12 steps, por favor, translate. You think all of those technicalities completely account for why the charity is well below the 75% threshold?

    ALSO, once a charity has been around for several years, as this one has, shouldn’t the threshold or % of $ going directly to those in need have dramatically increased? Common sense world, the answer would be yes. The fact that it seems to be no, what’s that tell us?
    ALSO, why wouldn’t the lawyers not want to meet with DS and/or other investigators that might want some clarifications on these matters?
    Translation: The perception: Looks like someone has something to hide. Wonder why?
    ALSO: If the IRS decides to audit this charity to decide if the monies collected is above the 75% threshold, the outcome would not be too good, yes no? Again, common sense answer: is No.
    Many decried the charities for Live Aid to Africa in 80s and some are making same points (wyclef jean) now regarding Haiti.The money for the most part did not reach the intended recepients. What reason do we have to believe that the monies are reaching the intended recepients now? Answer: We dont.
    There’s the rest of the two cents. QED (with common sense on top)
    l

    lukus on March 18, 2010 at 2:49 pm

Is NO one honest any more when it comes to $$$$, This did surprise me, and I am sorry to hear this, among other things.
I pray this will get straightened out some way.
Also Debbie you did a good book review about Muslim Mafia, and last but not least the three stooges in Washington D.C. Obama, Hitlary and Biden. What will they all think up next????

You can bet Pelosi has a plan, this is just the beginning folks. “She’s a man eater, watch out boys” with this in mind I wrote this little synopsis of what is happening under the covers, behind closed doors and in the showers.
My own notes: by carolyne
Imagine crying about the debt $$$$ to the American people when in fact. There is really NO OIL SHORTAGE OR MONEY SHORTAGE when Hitlary pledges 900 million to Hamas, and 100 million to Hatti. MO has a 75,000/month beauty parlor follow her around the world, Pelosi has her own jet, etc. etc. BO & MO vacation in Hawaii, @ 7,000/day plus – just to name a few. This dangerous group of progressives are going to need their own healthcare when this is finally all over, they will have to access accounts, personal or otherwise because TREASON carries a very heavy penalty.

carolyne on March 18, 2010 at 12:49 pm

..perhaps this is why Michael Savage refers to Sean as : ‘Sean Vanity’?

Nick Fury on March 18, 2010 at 1:00 pm

Bravo!Hannity jumped the shark for me way back when he showed slow motion footage of himself riding a horse along the border. Note that he brags about dining with Al Sharpton post taping. Guess they trade shake down tips.

Jay Patrick on March 18, 2010 at 1:03 pm

Just another example of the gains people like this make, when the people who are making the real sacrifices go on struggling. I say we take Sean Hannity and all is entourage to Afghanistan and Iraq and put them in the middle of all the action. Let them “earn” the money they have gleaned from what was supposed to be an honorable charitable purpose. How do these people sleep at night? Oh that’s right, in deluxe suites with all the bells and whistles. It is time someone calls these guys out and out loud! From the mountain tops. And that includes Wyclef Jean and all the other vermin out there who misrepresent in the name of patriotism. Shame on all of them! Thanks Debbie, once again, for bringing this kind of garbage to the top.

Musiccgirl on March 18, 2010 at 1:05 pm

If this is true, great work Debbie. Now can we get you to use your clever investigavtive skills on BO’s bribery of House and Senate politicians in order to ram Obamacare down our throats. Woodword & Bernstein are too busy to look into it.

cube on March 18, 2010 at 1:24 pm

I have been waiting for your report. I go by my stomach. I can’t stand to listen to Vannity. I can’t explain it, but he upsets my stomach.

Now I know: HE IS A TOTAL PHONY.

goldenmike4393 on March 18, 2010 at 1:59 pm

I’ve heard of those phony “police benefit” charities being busted and the perps doing time for fraud because they actually only give 20% of their take to fallen officers, etc.

But less than 4¢ on the dollar with Hannity’s concerts going to the disabled vets and/or their families??? That is seriously criminal fraud and Sean Hannity should not only be fired, but he should serve time in prison. This is an outrage.

DS_ROCKS! on March 18, 2010 at 3:10 pm

Debbie you really outdid yourself with this article. Fantastic work.

Shane Hayes on March 18, 2010 at 3:24 pm

I always knew that Hannity was a phony.

But one has to wonder: Being a founder and honorary chairman, LTC Oliver North (Ret.) had to have known about what you had uncovered in your research. But the question is how much and how long?

Charles Lee on March 18, 2010 at 3:29 pm

Lord Hannity as some talk radio hosts call him, is a dope and any radio station carrying him, supports globalism, neocons and staged terror attacks!

Bob Porrazzo on March 18, 2010 at 3:32 pm

I’ve hated Hannity since I wasted my time reading his first “book.” That’s all I needed to know he was a waste of time. I’ve since seen his show at work a few times, and his “Great American Panel” is embarrassing. Idiots talking about public policy is depressing.

He’s made enough money to live off of quite comfortably for the rest of his life. He can go away now.

Matt on March 18, 2010 at 4:04 pm

So as to understand and appreciate the scope of your assertions, Debbie, could you please provide a comparison of the percentage of contribution to say, “The United Way” that ends up actually reaching the intended beneficiaries as compared to the Hannity charity. You may be surprised.

SB: Actually, I wouldn’t be surprised, as I’ve written about the scams of United Way and the charity has had many problems–civil and criminal–for scams far less brazen than this. But since when did the United Way, a bloated, wasteful charity become the standard for Sean Vannity to scam his listeners and rip off seriously wounded soldiers and the kids of fallen soldiers? Is this two-wrongs-make-a-right day? By this standard, we should then probably excuse the actions of ACORN, right? DS

Syd B. on March 18, 2010 at 4:08 pm

This brings tears to my eyes, literally. To answer one poster’s question, yes, there are honest organizations when it comes to $$$$. But they aren’t the ones who make the big $$$$. We want to start a K-12 school for lower economic class kids in Chile, giving them an education that gives them a shot at future leadership (www.ccmchile.org). For $2.5 crummy million, we can do it. We have practically no overhead. I quit my job to work full time on the project, taking only enough from the corp. each month to pay the bills my wife’s salary don’t achieve. Individual small donors are striving heroically to help. So, this kind of flashy crap that DS has uncovered just eats my guts out. Sorry for feeling sorry for myself.

jimychelita on March 18, 2010 at 4:25 pm

If this story gets a lot of traction, which I think it eventually will, I can’t wait for Greta to start beating Vannity in the ratings. Throw this dirt bag off the air, or better yet, put him on at 3am.

Also, if this ever gets to the courts, put Vannity on trial in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Once convicted and made to pay back everything, let him meet Bubba and let them get acquainted for a few years.

Jarhead on March 18, 2010 at 4:35 pm

If this is all true, Hannity should be finished on radio and tv. He must be a very stupid man indeed to think he could get away with this kind of fraud and still have a career. I never much cared for his shows, but never imagined anything like this was going on.

This is sickening.

Qatmom on March 18, 2010 at 4:53 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field