May 1, 2013, - 5:01 pm

Starbucks Jihad: Iranian Chick Poisons San Jose Starbucks Drinks with Lethal Mix

By Debbie Schlussel

Ramineh Behbehanian, a Johnson & Johnson pharmacist of Iranian descent, decided to fill some orange juice bottles with lethal doses of rubbing alcohol and put them on the Starbucks shelves. But, hey, I’m sure the fact that she’s Iranian had nothin’ to do with it, right? Can’t possibly be jihad . . . if you’re in fantasyland. Police have predictably already uttered the usual “no motive surfaced” BS line. When someone from Iran poisons orange juice at Starbucks, trying to murder random Americans and hurt the business of pro-Israel Jew/Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz (whom Muslims are boycotting for speaking out against anti-Semitism and supporting Israel), I’m sure all those crescent-aligned facts are “just a coinkydink.” Gotta be. (Not the first time, by the way, that Starbucks has been targeted by some sort of extremists.) Oh, and you might wanna check your Johnson & Johnson meds. Just sayin’. I’m sure we’ll also be told more of the usual: that she’s just mentally disturbed or something.

raminehbehbehanian

starbucksboycott.jpg

Muslims in Lebanon Boycott Starbucks

A 50-year-old pharmacist was arrested Monday night after police say she removed two bottles of orange juice from a bag – which they say were filled with rubbing alcohol – and placed them on the shelf with other refrigerated items at a Starbucks in San Jose. San Jose Police Sgt. Jason Dwyer took Ramineh Behbehanian of San Jose into custody on an attempted murder charge because the orange juice contained what police said were lethal quantities of isopropyl alcohol. She is scheduled to appear in court Thursday.


She has no criminal record in Santa Clara County, according to court records. Late Tuesday, sources confirmed for NBC Bay Area that Behbehanian is a pharmacist working for a company owned by Johnson and Johnson.

Authorities are still not sure why she would have allegedly mixed rubbing alcohol with some orange juice in the afternoon, left the bottles in the refrigerated section alongside some yogurt and milk, and left the Snell Avenue store about 3:30 p.m. “Why would she do such a thing?” Chris Africa said, standing outside the Starbucks on Tuesday morning. “Was she trying to poison us?”

Um, yeah.

An alert customer standing behind her in line spotted her taking out her own bottles of juice from a green Starbucks bag, and put them in the refrigerator section. He also noticed a toxic smell. He told management. The woman might have felt under suspicion, police said, but a Starbucks employee got her license plate.

“A lot of people out there may have seen something and probably dismissed it,” Dwyer said. “But I believe that person saved lived by doing that.” The San Jose Fire Department responded to the scene, retrieved the bottles and tested the contents with hazardous materials equipment. It turned out, the bottles were filled with orange juice and rubbing alcohol. . . .

Police were able to track her down at her home, though no motive has surfaced

A Starbucks spokesperson told NBC Bay Area that the company destroyed all the other juices in the Snell Avenue store out of an abundance of caution and had all other stores in Bay Area check their juice seals.

Would be much easier if they just eyeballed “customers” from Iran and other such paradise-esque vacation spots that have in common the dominance of the Religion of Tsarnaevs.




Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,


97 Responses

from the sufi master(death seaker)

[The dhimmi] is commanded to put his soul, good fortune and desires to death. Above all he should kill the love of life, leadership and honor. [The dhimmi] is to invert the longings of his soul, he is to load it down more heavily than it can bear until it is completely submissive. Thereafter nothing will be unbearable for him. He will be indifferent to subjugation or might. Poverty and wealth will be the same to him; praise and insult will be the same; preventing and yielding will be the same; lost and found will be the same. Then, when all things are the same, it [the soul] will be submissive and yield willingly what it should give. [Tafsir ibn ‘Ajibah. Commentary on Q9:29. Ahmad ibn Muhammad Ibn `Ajibah]

Frankz on May 1, 2013 at 5:10 pm

Motive? They can’t bring themselves to say Islam!

After all, the Religion Of Peace doesn’t hate us and doesn’t seek jihad.

Its never their religion that compels Muslims to murder infidels.

Uh huh – and we give them day jobs where they can fulfill the path of Islam like good dhimmis and pretend not to notice their deeds are anything but benign.

Only in America.

NormanF on May 1, 2013 at 5:28 pm

    you got that right NormanF…thank God…normal Americans are waking up to the fact that Islam, and the followers of the law of Islam, are terrorists in action…or in waiting…nothing in between. Lets stop muslims from proliferating in our country. No more immigration for followers of Islam! Europe is overrun with them and their political agenda is destroying the cultures of every country.

    Barbara Wall on May 1, 2013 at 6:01 pm

Hey, our President said that Islam is the religion of peace, and I believe every word that comes out of his mouth.

Got to go, as my winged pink unicorn is here to fly me to have lunch with the Queen of Hearts.

Jonathan E. Grant on May 1, 2013 at 5:31 pm

Her name is Armenian – but not all of them are Christian and pro-Western.

In northwest Iran, near the Armenian border, there are plenty of Iranian Muslims with Armenian surnames.

NF: It can be Armenian, but it can also be Iranian, and in this case, I’ve confirmed that she is Iranian. Not all names ending in “ian” are Armenian. Many are Iranians who are Muslim. It is possible that they came from Armenians who were forcibly c converted to Islam. DS

NormanF on May 1, 2013 at 5:36 pm

    I had an Armenian “auntie” and she told me what Debbie said about the names. “ian” means “son of” as a suffix. The languages are related and the two peoples closely connected. There are Christian and Jewish Iranians with “ian” suffixes as well.

    Italkit on May 2, 2013 at 12:00 am

Good article, isn’t this a coincidence or something, the muslim zealots worldwide are doing a boycott of Starbucks because their CEO Mr. Schultz supports the country of Israel and is a zionist, so the muslim-nutcases are boycotting his company because Mr. Schultz supports humanity, reason and sanity by being an Israel supporter.

And also check this out Debbie and everyone, christian zealots in this country a year ago and a month ago did a boycott against Starbucks because they’ve out of the clear blue supports gay marriage (my assumption is that LGBT front groups bribed the company with tons of money to support the policy?). Isn’t this a coincidence or something, on one hand, muslim zealots are anti-Starbucks because the CEO is pro-Israel and on the other hand, christian fanatics are anti-Starbucks because the company is pro-gay marriage! Think about it folks!

“A naiton is defined by its borders, language & culture!”

Sean R. on May 1, 2013 at 5:53 pm

@Sean R.
Yeah well muslim-nutcases are all gainfully employed there so they can all jerk off in unison to sufi inspired slave master fantasies for all I care as long as they don’t poison my coffee.
When was the last time a Christian fundamentalist spiked your coffee?
Let’s just keep the A-holes out of America.

Thanks.

Frankz on May 1, 2013 at 6:08 pm

    You’re right Frankz, not disputing your message, to their credit, even though they maybe annoying at times and thankfully they don’t post NO type of threat to our national survival, christian fanatics according to my knowledge haven’t attempted of poisoning our foods for god knows what, unlike what this nutty Iranian/Persian woman did when she tried to poison the coffees at Starbucks with lethal mix.

    “A nation is defined by its borders, language & culture!”

    Sean R. on May 1, 2013 at 9:17 pm

      ‘Christian fanatics’, SeanR? There aren’t any Christian fanatics, at least any statistically significant number. People who are ‘fanatical’ about following Christ’s teachings, merely pray for their enemies and love their neighbors more than average.

      waynesteapartyworld on May 2, 2013 at 11:02 am

Burp

Frankz on May 1, 2013 at 6:09 pm

I mistakenly skipped over this story. The first name got me thinking and the Armenian name made me doubt what I should have figured out.

My training is far from done. Too many things getting by me that shouldn’t.

Gird your you-know-whats, haters. I’m not examining the Religion Of Pieces as closely as I should! Sorry, Dhimmis!

Skunky on May 1, 2013 at 6:34 pm

“Would be much easier if they just eyeballed “customers” from Iran and other such paradise-esque vacation spots that have in common the dominance of the Religion of Tsarnaevs.”

Actually, it would be much easier if we did not allow Muslim immigrants.

skzion on May 1, 2013 at 6:36 pm

On the morning of September 29, 1982, twelve-year-old Mary Kellerman of Elk Grove Village, Illinois, died after taking a capsule of Extra-Strength Tylenol. Adam Janus of Arlington Heights, Illinois, died in the hospital shortly after. Adam’s brother Stanley of Lisle, Illinois, and sister-in-law Theresa died after gathering to mourn his death, having taken pills from the same bottle. Soon afterward, Mary McFarland of Elmhurst, Illinois, Paula Prince of Chicago, and Mary Reiner of Winfield, also died in similar incidents.[2][3] Investigators soon discovered the Tylenol link. Urgent warnings were broadcast, and police drove through Chicago neighborhoods issuing warnings over loudspeakers.

As the tampered-with bottles came from different factories, and the seven deaths had all occurred in the Chicago area, the possibility of sabotage during production was ruled out. Instead, the culprit was believed to have entered various supermarkets and drug stores over a period of weeks, removed packages of Tylenol from the shelves, adulterated their contents with solid cyanide compound at another location, and then replaced the bottles. In addition to the five bottles which led to the victims’ deaths, three other tampered-with bottles were discovered.

Johnson & Johnson distributed warnings to hospitals and distributors and halted Tylenol production and advertising.

So saith Wiki. This apparently is unsolved. Hm.

skzion on May 1, 2013 at 6:44 pm

Some hope for some loose change skzion?

Frankz on May 1, 2013 at 7:18 pm

    Frankz, huh?

    skzion on May 1, 2013 at 7:27 pm

      @skzion-I think Frankz is refering to that 9/11 Truther bogus internet movie LOOSE CHANGE. Frankz is refering how you might be implying there is more than just a lone wolf, in other words you are trying to make this more than it seems. However I can be interpreting this incorrectly, so I will let Frankz answer your question.

      Mario on May 1, 2013 at 7:44 pm

More Immigration = More Overpopulation= More Polution= More Crime = More Terrorists= More Welfare who needs it

Our legal and illegal immigration laws are still not enforced as we already forgot what led to and happened on 9/11 and now againt in Boston and will happen again because of our changing ideology in America.

May God Bless America And Us All

Wolfman on May 1, 2013 at 7:19 pm

isn’t that attempted murder
regardless that it’s
anonymous

the pigs of jizzlam
are exactly that

unfit to cohabit
with humanity

prestigio on May 1, 2013 at 7:52 pm

@skzion,
brother can you spare a dime?

Frankz on May 1, 2013 at 8:00 pm

I would have thought this was an insurance scam until the woman got spooked. She was probably going to buy the juice, drink it, then sue Starbucks for making her sick.

Rocky Lore on May 1, 2013 at 8:16 pm

@Mario

That title is recycled it isn’t original but I appreciate your interpretation.
I haven’t seen the truther skit though.
I didn’t really mean much by it except that everything is a commodity these days especially everything that supposedly isn’t.

Frankz on May 1, 2013 at 8:24 pm

muslims are garbage. islam is evil. i can’t wait for the day we finally go to war against islam.

mike on May 1, 2013 at 8:36 pm

    We’re at war with them now.

    Pray Hard on May 2, 2013 at 11:32 am

Here we go again with the dangerous distribution of whatever they want. Nooo, we should never question the religion of peace. I will continue my stance as usual and inform people I deem save worthy. The problem is, there are so many mindless idiots out there. Thank G-d the guy in back of her in line was a sheep dog type instead of the sheep type. There could be a lot of problems. People are going to have to be more vigilant so pressure cookers and poison juices aren’t given out to everyone. Maybe we’ll get lucky and they’ll start taking each other out.

samurai on May 1, 2013 at 9:45 pm

    President Obam maybe you should extend your pathetic ban on guns to include orange juice,preser cockers and Starbuck coffee.

    Igalk on May 1, 2013 at 11:06 pm

But just think how much fun our beloved Marines will have exterminating them when the time comes.

#1 Vato on May 1, 2013 at 10:08 pm

Please take my guns from me and let more people into the country that want to kill me.

Ok, thanks.

Red Randy on May 2, 2013 at 12:47 am

“A role model not just for women, but for everyone.” (er… except dhimmis)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YT7r4z5wXkA#!

Frankz on May 2, 2013 at 5:41 am

“In order to provide terror training, Al-Awadi brought in one of the world’s most renowned female terrorists – Ahlam Tamimi – to teach Muslims worldwide how to carefully infiltrate, plan, and select locations in order to carry out terrorist attacks in heavily populated areas to maximize the civilian death toll.”

Al-Harbi with his 212 3B designation may not need such elementary training guides but they certainly seem popular in his social circles.

Frankz on May 2, 2013 at 5:59 am

Tamimi: I studied all the ideologies of each [terrorist] group in order to decide which one I will join” she told Al-Awadi who supported everything she did.

With my media card I was able to enter back and forth, undetected, to do journalistic interviews in Jerusalem in order to avoid detection by the Zionists

Al-Awadi: So you get in and out as a journalist?

Tamimi: Yes

Al-Awadi: Beautiful!

Frankz on May 2, 2013 at 6:06 am

Tamimi: Of course, of course. (11:53) First, I scouted places to decide where to carry out Jihadi operations. (12:05 – 12:07) I would wander into Jerusalem to find the best spots to carry out these missions. (12:08-12:11)

First, I would scout stores and major shopping malls… (12:40-12:43) … schools, restaurants… (12:44-12:47)

I would then present my findings to the leader of the cell. (12:48-12:56)

I would do a meticulous count on the numbers of people moving in these areas and study it mathematically. (12:57-13:04)

I would use my wrist watch and count how many were walking in an area within one hour. (13:05-13:11)

So I would make reports that if an operation is conducted in such and such area (13:12-13:14)

…then I would estimate the numbers of casualties; in some cases my number would be 30 Israelis will die and other estimates it would be 50 Israelis that will die. (13:15-13:121)

Frankz on May 2, 2013 at 6:08 am

…the school for example, I would study the morning time when school children would enter. (13:33-13:37)

…of course the second phase would be the Jihadi operation itself. (14:05-14:11)

Frankz on May 2, 2013 at 6:13 am

“The base of the conflict between the Israelis and Palestinians is a religious struggle” – Ahlam Tamimi

Try telling that to Ehud Olmert

Frankz on May 2, 2013 at 6:27 am

Meanwhile in the heart of Europe…

Cosmopolitan Belgium makes steady and certain progress towards the 12th century.
No more bikinis for you Belgium, maybe you’ll be allowed to keep your chocolate.

http://youtu.be/SbMnA3uO9As

Frankz on May 2, 2013 at 8:19 am

Along these lines, Israel National News posts this report today:

— A Bedouin worker at a coffee shop in Givat Shmuel was arrested for allegedly trying to poison the shop’s manager —

A Bedouin worker at a coffee shop in Givat Shmuel has been arrested for allegedly trying to poison the coffee shop’s manager. The worker is being questioned and may be charged with attempted murder, police said.

The incident came to light after the manager, a woman in her thirties, checked into a local hospital this week after complaining of severe stomach pains. Doctors treated her and discovered that she had some heavy chemicals in her digestive system, usually associated with grease remover. Medical staff alerted police on the possibility of foul play.

Police questioned the patient and discovered that she was the manager of an Aroma coffee shop in Givat Shmuel. After an investigation, police arrested a waiter at the restaurant, who is accused of adding the grease remover to a salad he served the manager several days ago.

The worker confessed to poisoning the manager, as his way of getting back at her over a financial dispute. The worker has been arrested pending an indictment.

Raymond in DC on May 2, 2013 at 9:21 am

“An alert customer . . . .”?

It may have been J. Frankfurter, or Justice Brandeis—I don’t quite recall—it may have been in one of the spy cases—but, one Justice said that, the best security for the nation, was the citizen; and, . . . be those ‘best security citizens’, armed, . . . what could be finer?

PhillipGaley on May 2, 2013 at 10:31 am

If we’re going to stop the influx of Islamists into our country I would start with deporting the one that’s running our country……Obama.

Jerry G on May 2, 2013 at 10:37 am

And to put this in perspective, it is a staggering monument to ignorance and bigotry that blood libel slanders are still accepted by many in the world, including numerous anti-Semites in the United States.

Meanwhile, this is going on.

Little Al on May 2, 2013 at 10:43 am

Maybe she thought Boston bomber’s mommy was getting too much attention. Jihad of attrition, wasted resources and attention whoring …

This seems to be more of an attention-getter stunt to me. Being a pharmacist, she should have been able to come up with something much more lethal and not as easily detectable.

Muslims … Because zombies just can’t get the job done alone …

Pray Hard on May 2, 2013 at 11:43 am

How did you determine that this person is an Iranian? You are stating that as a fact & I am curious as to what those facts are. For example, do you know her immigration status, have confirmation of her religion or some official documents, police or FBI reports, birth certificate, etc.? Something besides a suspicious sounding name? If that is confirmed then isn’t there a danger that she might not have been acting alone. I also wonder why they would only check for orange juice contamination. What would have stopped her from spiking other drinks. They shouldn’t be taking her word for it as it would be in her interest to minimize what she may have already done.

zac on May 2, 2013 at 11:45 am

    Killing Muslims is no crime.

    skzion on May 2, 2013 at 1:37 pm

@E/zac = Dhimmi Prozac

The same way I know you probably used to call yourself E.
Can I prove it? No.
Would I be stupid not to know it? Yes.

But seriously why don’t you read the article?

Debbie has investigated that’s how she knows.

The facts of the case will come out.
They’re a matter of public knowledge so you don’t have to rely on Debbie if you don’t want to.

Only Muslims get to ignore or suppress information they don’t want to hear as a matter of principle.

Aren’t you really asking why Debbie chose to rub your face in the truth?

Frankz on May 2, 2013 at 12:09 pm

    Sorry but Debbie has investigated is how she knows is not an answer. And no one said anything about truth being rubbed in anyone’s face nor have I defended or accused anyone. I am merely trying to find a source that is substantiated with some facts & sources.

    zac on May 2, 2013 at 12:33 pm

I’m sort of confused by this. How can Starbuck be anti-semitic AND support Israel at the same time?

Jews are semitic. So it doesn’t make sense that Starbucks would be anti-semitic and supporting Israel.

Maybe they’re anti-Muslim, but you can’t be anti-semitic and be supportive of it at the same time. That makes NO sense!

glen on May 2, 2013 at 12:14 pm

@zac/E

How do you know they stopped checking after the orange juice?
I’m sure the thought did occur to people investigating that she might not be acting alone.

You’re just launching a FUD attack like a typical terrorist aren’t you?

Are you commanded in Islam to cast FUD into the hearts of unbelievers or does it come naturally?

Frankz on May 2, 2013 at 12:35 pm

    Man you are full of hysteria. So now anyone that wants to learn what the facts are is a terrorist.

    As far as Starbucks checking the juice at other stores I was citing an ABC article titled California Chemist Charged in Starbucks Poisoning Attempt & I will quote “Hutson said that other stores in the area were asked to check juice bottles’ safety seals to make sure they weren’t tampered with.” It did not say that all drinks in the cases were checked. I simply wondered about this statement given by Starbucks. It would seem logical that Starbucks would want the customers to know that all drinks in the cases have been checked for tampering. At the very least I would want that assurance before I purchased another drink there.

    I think if this woman is found guilty she should get the gallows no matter what her motivation was. At this point it is not clear what all of the facts are. As a Starbucks customer & a concerned American I am interested in learning what the facts are in this case.

    So take your baseless flaming accusations that I am a terrorist & put it where the sun doesn’t shine.

    zac on May 2, 2013 at 1:11 pm

      Frankz, I am with you regarding “Zac”/’E’asy Target. Not hard to ascertain but good work!

      Skunky on May 2, 2013 at 6:56 pm

@glen
I’m confused too. Did Debbie say starbucks was anti-semitic?
Anyway to clear it up for you.
It doesn’t matter if they’re pro Israel or not.
It only matters that Muslims perceive them to be.

Frankz on May 2, 2013 at 12:39 pm

Since nobody has a motive on this one how about his:

A military search, like Boston, of all Starbucks is in order.

Starbucks is obviously trying to poison their customers.

Especially Islamists.

These isolated “one off” attacks are getting out of hand.

Panhandle on May 2, 2013 at 1:20 pm

@Panhandle(Indiana Jones to the rescue)

Ha Ha, you velly funny….. Indy.

Call me when you find non Muslim terrorist then we laugh some more…

You velly funny…. Indy.

Call me when you find lost sankara stones of prejudice.

Velly funny… ha ha

Frankz on May 2, 2013 at 1:31 pm

@Panhandle
Sorry I think I misinterpreted you Panhandle. My apologies. Jokes on me.

Frankz on May 2, 2013 at 2:51 pm

@zac / E,
still a windbag…
Not “anybody” just you.

If you’re going to change your handle every post to maintain credibility I’m going to call you a terrorist.

You’re also a liar because you said this site wasn’t worth your time but you won’t get lost.

Anyway here you are again asking stupid questions.
Why don’t you phone ABC and find out what their official snow job is?

Frankz on May 2, 2013 at 4:17 pm

    I have not changed my handle, that was just another baseless accusation made by you & speaking of windbags you seem to be the biggest windbag on this forum & apparently you lack basic reading comprehension skills. Nothing in my post defended the horrible act that was committed at Starbucks. I simply was asking if the statement of fact made by this website could be substantiated. If someone starts stating facts then it should be no problem backing those facts up. It may turn out to be correct but the article did not substantiate it.

    I never said this site wasn’t worth my time. Where are you getting this garbage from? And if you are implying that I am this “E” whatever in your earlier post you are seriously mistaken nor was there even a post by “E” on this forum topic.

    I have never even visited this site before today. I was simply using Google trying to get more information on what happened at Starbucks, saw a link to this site & read some interesting commentary & I was simply trying to find out if that information had been substantiated. Maybe this site beat the other news sources to the punch & if so great if it can be substantiated.

    You go off the deep end for no reason whatsoever & go into this terrorist rant accusing me of being a Muslim. Not that it’s any of your business but I happen to be Christian but I am mature enough to know that it takes a while for the full story & correct facts to emerge therefore I do not rush to sweeping judgments, engage in hysteria or start calling people terrorist on a forum without any basis.

    Terrorism wins when people start behaving the way you do.

    This is a country that respects the rule of law not the rule of mob mentality.

    Why are you so threatened by a simple request for substantiation of a story? I wasn’t even doubting the credibility of the website & was just curious because no source or witness was named not even anonymously to substantiate the article & at the time I saw no other articles out there that had determined the suspect to be an Iranian or a Muslim. That will be huge news if that turns out to be the case.

    I am simply trying to ascertain the news by looking at multiple sources.

    So why don’t you be man enough to pipe down the baseless accusations & hysteria or are you one of those type that can never admit to being wrong.

    zac on May 2, 2013 at 5:08 pm

@”Killing Muslims is no crime”

Well, that statement is surely evidence that Zionism = Naziism

That’s what the Nazis said: Killing Jews is no crime.

There are Nazis in America. Guess who they are? That’s right: Right wing Christians. The same Christians the Zionists are relying on to help them kill all the Muslims. And who do you think these Christians are going to turn on next using the same draconian “anti-terror” provisions used to persecute Muslims now? Right again: The Jews.

the naked ugly truth on May 2, 2013 at 4:28 pm

    Ugly, you are a sad Solidarity slut, aren’t you?

    The idea that anything related to Israel is “hidden” when one can easily find such stories shows that the whole “hidden” trope is a lie. But then, so is the concept of the “Palestinian.”

    In this case, the Jews of Yitzhar (I presume) are retaliating for Muslim aggression (these stories are all about the same, so I didn’t bother to read your Fakestinian news release). As Muslims have refused to cede sovereignty to the rightful residents of Eretz Israel (Jews), and have actually stolen from and killed Jews, there is now a situation of milchemet mitzvah in the Land. Thus, every Muslim there should be killed. The really UGLY truth is that the government of Israel supports the Muslims in Eretz Israel over the Jews.

    I don’t know why you disparage the Nazis when you actually LOOOVE them. I mean, you have dedicated yourself to aiding the most repulsive bunch of Muslims in the world–Fakestinians–to kill Jews. You just don’t want Jews (or Christians) to take your blood lust seriously and respond.

    Also, you fetid sore, I am a Jew, not a Christian.

    Finally, I want to be clear that killing a Muslim outside the Land is also no biggie for me. Why would I sympathize with Muslims? Their lives have no value for me, as they are dedicated to the annihilation of Jews. They are Bnei Amalek, and you are an Amalekite groupie and slut.

    Thanks.

    skzion on May 2, 2013 at 5:27 pm

I am not “dedicated” to anything you suggest. It’s just that I am against all terrorists, not just the Muslim ones.

Yes it was retaliation: retaliation by illegal invaders for a single murder, perpetrated against scores of Muslims including schoolgirls, among others. Retaliation is not justification. This was an act of terrorism, which possibly could have been prevented if the Israeli authorities had intervened promptly.

Yes, one can find out about Israeli crimes by searching online. The point is that the US media makes a point to bring to the attention of the US public Muslim crimes while studiously ignoring those committed by Jews in Palestine. And pointing to that truth is fair game in a political debate.

the naked ugly truth on May 2, 2013 at 5:46 pm

    “I am not “dedicated” to anything you suggest. It’s just that I am against all terrorists, not just the Muslim ones.”

    You lie, ugly. You are not against Muslim terrorists; indeed, you support them–you dedicate yourself to propagating their narrative.

    I have already shown your “hidden truth” trope to be a nasty lie. Another lie is that American media do not cover Fakestinian deaths. Good grief! The US media are hopelessly pro-Fakestinian.

    Yes it was retaliation: retaliation by illegal invaders for a single murder, perpetrated against scores of Muslims including schoolgirls, among others.

    “Illegal invaders,” you Solidarity Slut? Not according to Torah. Not even according to “binding” international law (most “international law” is simply irrelevant babble from the General Assembly and doesn’t even purport to be “binding”).

    “Only” a “single” murder, you vermin? Well! What’s a murder or two, huh? But of course there have been repeated murders because that is what Muslims do, and that is what you make possible.

    You keep trying to tell a sob story about the poor, young female offspring (“schoolgirls”) who haven’t grown up enough to creating a new brood of killers. *I* say that it’s best to kill them before they reproduce.

    “Retaliation is not justification.”

    Sure it is, especially when Judaism teaches that it is moral to slaughter the killers of Jews. I repeat: I would rejoice if every Muslim in Eretz Israel were attacked–along with the Solidarity groupies like you. There is no place for foreign squatters in Eretz Israel: that means you and your Muslim buddies. Start killing the Bnei Amalek, and the terrorism problem will be eliminated at once.

    skzion on May 2, 2013 at 7:05 pm

    Skzion, we have to find a word or sentence to dismiss such know-nothing nutters as this Lefty fraud. They are like diseased flies.

    I felt good reading the pablum this idiot was spewing. I didn’t agree with ONE THING and it made me proud not to be on this puke’s side.

    When logic-inverted idiots spew “Right Wing Christians” I know to stop immediately and head for the hills (or look for an asylum for these nutters to be chucked into).

    The percentages are alllll in favour of a certain disgusting, hairy, backwards, faux-religious, socio-political construct of madness other wise known as Islam.

    I don’t listen to any dhimmi idiot who can’t see that in 2013! They are insane babblers who should be bound in strait-jackets.

    Skunky on May 2, 2013 at 7:06 pm

Ya gotta love them zany muslims!

DS_ROCKS! on May 2, 2013 at 5:55 pm

Well. ya know that muslims don’t imbibe, so I would guess that the poor gal was just trying to be friendly by premixing a couple of free screwdrivers for the infidel customers who do.

DS_ROCKS! on May 2, 2013 at 5:58 pm

@the naked ugly truth&E&zac

Still the biggest liar around and still furnishing us with “facts” we wouldn’t care about even if you weren’t perpetually lying.

I wondered how long it would take for you to get back to your old refrain.

We are all equally bad little boys and girls so lets all just behave nicely and the boogie man will go away.

You’re pathetic.

Frankz on May 2, 2013 at 7:01 pm

    Apparently you are conflating user “the naked ugly” & “E” with “Zac” which is totally wrong.

    I have not tried to chink anyone’s armor. I simply was trying to find out if a statement of fact on this website had been substantiated or a source cited since no other news site at the time had confirmed it.

    zac on May 2, 2013 at 9:44 pm

@skunky & skzion

Guys this is what I’ve noticed if it’s of any use to you.
You don’t have to reply to me Skunky.

So far the she only has 3 messages so they are close to her heart, the rest is disguise.

1)
We are ignorant and bigoted and therefore inaccurate and misrepresenting the situation.
(This is the initial phase where she tries to find chinks in the arguments or conclusions of the article.)

2)
We do not know Islam like we she knows Islam.
Therefore it is her duty to educate us about their grievances.
(links to articles that show supposed Israeli crimes)

3)
We are just as bad as the terrorists

3) follows 2) follows 1)

Of course she is powerless to do anything about the real terrorists that are actually blowing people up in America so we get a history lesson to inform us that this should be expected from our past foreign policy actions.

People who object to this and do not want to reach out to religious intolerance are…

you guessed it….

3) Just as bad as the terrorists

So it goes
She will change her handle and the facts about herself to try and invalidate anything you say.

Frankz on May 2, 2013 at 8:07 pm

    Frankz, I don’t think they are the same fool. Because these fools and knaves attend basically to the same stream of info, they just have the same general view.

    skzion on May 2, 2013 at 9:04 pm

      Hold on there a minute I have not taken anyone’s side that is absolute nonsense. I also called for the suspect to get the gallows if found guilty so I am hardly sympathetic.

      Let me clear things up for you. I am a Starbucks customer that doesn’t like the idea of anyone messing with my drinks. I was simply trying to ascertain the facts for the following reasons. If this suspect was some local nut acting on her own over some personal beef like her daughter was fired at Starbucks or she was pissed off over a bad latte then I can have a drink at Starbucks with a fair degree of confidence.

      If it turns out that she is an extremist or part of a wider terrorist group that is bent on poisoning the drinks at Starbucks to stab at Americans then that is on an entirely different level & maybe it would be prudent to be careful with the drinks for a while until things are sorted out.

      zac on May 2, 2013 at 11:00 pm

@skzion
Sure that’s possible but zac&nakeduglies had a funny habit of showing up together more or less sequentially to argue the same side.
It’s not so much their view but their approach.

Frankz on May 2, 2013 at 9:42 pm

    No that is absolute nonsense. I have never even visited this site before today & have taken no one’s side. Go back & read my post more carefully. I simply was trying to find out if the statement that the suspect was Iranian or of Iranian descent & Muslim had been substantiated. At that point in time no one really knew what the motive was. It could be a number of things like maybe she was pissed off at Starbucks over a bad latte or maybe she was planting the drink to buy it later & file a bogus lawsuit. Maybe she had a friend or daughter that was fired from Starbucks & had a grudge. If she is in fact an Iranian Muslim extremist that would be big news so I was simply trying to ascertain if that had been substantiated since this site was ahead of the other news sites at the time. Usually after any horrendous crime or act of terrorism there is confusion & conflicting news stories, speculation and lack of hard information. Case in point look at how many times the Boston Marathon story changed before the picture became much more clear. I was simply trying to look at multiple sources to find out what happened & ascertain the facts since I am a Starbucks customer & don’t want anyone messing with my drinks.

    I also cited a quote from a Starbucks representative in an ABC article that stated that the juice was checked at other stores & was simply pointing out that customers would want the assurance that all of the drinks in the cases had been checked for tampering not just the juice as the quote from Starbucks stated.

    And as for the suspect I stated that she should get the gallows if found guilty. That is hardly being sympathetic.

    For that, apparently Frankz thinks I am a terrorist disguised as “E” & “the naked truth” which I have absolutely nothing to do with. Total hysteria to make such accusations based on a post that was simply curious if an article had been substantiated. You see most articles that make a statement of fact usually cite a witness, police statement, FBI finding,a news source or even a government official that wishes to remain anonymous. This article didn’t cite anything & made a statement of fact. I was simply trying to find out the source or basis for the statement of fact & was making no judgment one way or the other as to the validity of the statement. Like I said no other news source had made such a statement yet so I was trying to find out if this had been substantiated yet as in any other source out there reporting this.

    zac on May 2, 2013 at 10:27 pm

    Do you understand just how absurd you sound? You rushed to judgment calling me a terrorist & a Muslim because I simply was checking to see if what was reported had been substantiated & based on just that one single post you apparently see some pattern & thereby know me as “E” & “the naked ugly truth”.

    One single post was a pattern to you (anyone can look at the thread & verify this). Well that says a whole lot more about you than it does about me.

    zac on May 3, 2013 at 12:50 am

    Frankz, these two could hang out together in cyberspace and come here together.

    skzion on May 3, 2013 at 12:54 am

      Based on what exactly. Show me one thing in my post where I sided with this “E” or “the naked ugly truth”.

      Where have I shown any sympathy for the suspect? I called for her to get the gallows if found guilty.

      Where have I blamed America? Nowhere have I done this.

      Where have I sided with Muslims? Nowhere have I done this.

      All I tried to do is find out whether the report on this site that the suspect was Iranian or of Iranian descent had been substantiated or a source cited. I simply wanted to know & I am watching all of the news sites to find out what they are learning about the suspect.

      You guys really need to stop seeing a conspiracy in everything.

      I got nothing to do with these other posters nor do I hangout with anyone in cyberspace.

      You were right when you said that I was not the same as “E” & “the naked truth” but I did not appreciate being called a fool for no reason.

      Go back & look at how Frankz jumped to his erroneous conclusion based solely off of my first post. A single flipping post. Ridiculous! Look at his reply to my first post because he addresses me as “E” & has already conflated me with these other posters. Truly loony & it is past time he man up & apologize.

      Rather than admit his error he tries to turn me into some sort of terrorist.

      zac on May 3, 2013 at 1:19 am

@zac
“Apparently you are conflating user “the naked ugly” & “E” with “Zac” which is totally wrong.”

How would we know if it’s totally wrong or not from anything you say?

Just argue the issue and I already told you why all of your issues are stupid.

Frankz on May 2, 2013 at 10:15 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field