January 7, 2013, - 3:17 pm

UK Judge: Mom Who Murdered Son for Not Learning Koran is “Devoted & Caring Mum”

By Debbie Schlussel

How dhimmified and appeasing of Islam has Great Britain become? So much so that a Muslim mother who beat her son to death for not learning the koran has been called a “devoted and caring mum” by the Islamo-pandering judge. Yup, when I hear about a womb donor who savagely beats her kid to death, the first adjectives I think of are “devoted” and “caring.” Don’t you?

saraegeson

Religion of (Rest In) Peace: Muslim Mother of the Year Sara Ege Beat 7-Year-Old Son to Death, Judge Calls Her “Devoted & Caring Mum”

Sara Ege, 33, was said to have treated her seven-year-old son “like a dog” and repeatedly beaten him with a stick, rolling pin and slipper for failing to memorise the religious text quickly enough.

But as he sentenced her to life for the “dreadful crime”, Mr Justice Wyn Williams said that in many respects she was a “very good mother”.


Huh? That’s like saying, but for a dreadful crime, Jeffrey Dahmer was a very good man and foodie with an incredibly discerning palate for exotic cuisine.

Ege collapsed as the sentence was delivered at Cardiff Crown Court and had to be helped, trembling and sobbing, from the dock.

The trial heard that for at least three months before his death in July 2010, Ege had beaten Yaseen on a number of occasions, sometimes so badly he was unable to write and sit down.

The beatings, often with a wooden pestle, became so bad that on the day he died he was suffering from “serious abdominal injuries” and “multiple fractures”.

In a confession that she later retracted, Ege said that as he lay dying he continued to recite tracts from the Islamic Holy book.

Ege then burnt the body in an attempt to cover up the crime and claim that he died in a house fire.

Judge Williams, who said she must serve at least 17 years in jail, said “the cause of the beating was your unreasonable view that he wasn’t learning passages quickly enough”.

And yet, despite all this, the moronic Judge Williams lets Ms. Ege know what a wonderful parent she is:

“I accept you were a devoted and caring mum.

Except for the obsession with Yaseen learning you did many fine things to bring him up as a young boy.”

Hey, you’re a fabulous parent, except for that tiny, irrelevant detail of constant savage abuse and beating your kid to death. ABSURD.




Tags: , , , , , , , , ,


61 Responses

Did the judge go to Law School in the Detroit area?

Little Al on January 7, 2013 at 3:19 pm

Might that judge now have a fatwa issued for sentencing to jail this fine Muslim follower? Coincident with their twisted sense of justice….

The Dealmaster on January 7, 2013 at 3:30 pm

It could be seen as damning her with faint praise.

Back in the day, she would’ve been burned at the stake for being a witch.

The Reverend Jacques on January 7, 2013 at 3:32 pm

I feel the same way as you over this case. The judge needs to be struck off for such an abhorrent comment. What the woman did to her son was sickening to the extreme and no halfway decent mother would act in such a way.

Alison on January 7, 2013 at 3:32 pm

Debbie you’re a Cunt.

SyrianRebel on January 7, 2013 at 3:39 pm

    …and you are masquerading as a human.

    sgt on January 7, 2013 at 4:55 pm

    Four letter words from the followers of the Religion Of Peace.

    Debbie is leaving your post up to let the world know how far you savages will go. Even lower than murdering a little boy for not becoming as evil as his mother fast enough!

    Let’s just say with friends like you, Islam doesn’t need enemies.

    NormanF on January 7, 2013 at 5:05 pm

    *YAWN*

    You know Mr. SyrianRebel, I really hope Ms., Schlussel leaves you’re asinine comment up to prove both her point and our point on how ethically bankrupt many of you’re Co-religionist are. And calling DS a four-letter word to justify you’re stupidity and a kids death & how totally screwed up you really are buster!

    ”A nation is defined by it’s borders, language & culture!”

    Sean R. on January 7, 2013 at 5:52 pm

    Excellent response Syrianreb. When nothing of substance comes to your feeble mind, respond with asinine desert-trash, muzzie crap. Did you know your parents were bro and sis? THAT explains your dribble.

    WilliamMunny on January 7, 2013 at 6:20 pm

    Lol. Yup, I can believe you are a Syrian Rebel.

    skzion on January 7, 2013 at 7:04 pm

      …. Lol. Yup, I can believe you are a Syrian Rebel ….

      Got all of the attributes: Being a raping, sexually-mutilating, mass-murdering, mattress-munching, turd-burgling, pillow-biting, sister, goat and little-boy-buggering bloody psychopath being among the finer required qualities.

      The less fine being way too gross for listing among polite company!

      Brian Richard Allen (@Brian_R_Allen) on October 23, 2013 at 11:39 pm

    Syrian, do you think that mother was justified in killing her own child? Rather than calling Debbie names, why not answer the question. In this case, your silence will be deemed approval.

    Worry01 on January 7, 2013 at 9:40 pm

      No, I think she should be hung from her ovaries for doing that AND giving Islam a bad name worst than it is…. But Debbie is still a cunt and i dont care much for Islam.

      SyrianRebel on January 8, 2013 at 2:22 am

        Syrian, how does Debbie give Islam a bad name? Was she a Muslim murdering her own child? Muslims give Islam its reputation, and not infidels.

        Also Syrian, if you do not care for Islam much, why are you defending it in this most extreme case? Why do you go from making a crude sexual remark to a death threat?

        Syrian, your crudeness and violent nature come through very, very clearly. Those are the qualities of a Muslim. Finally, is Islam such a ghastly thing that you have to deny being one? You do seem to think so.

        Finally, your nickname gives you away. I do not think that the few Christians who remain in Syria would welcome Assad’s fall unless they had a death wish. They would be left. to murderous thugs who have fantasies about mutilating female sexual organs. Does that sound like someone you know Syrian? You go to bed with him every night

        Worry01 on January 8, 2013 at 4:10 am

          Worry, there seems to be a pattern of how Mooooslims come here and stick up for Satanic Islam yet deny they are Mooooslim. I wonder why?

          Either that or it can just be another incarnation of everyone’s favourite racist Shi’ite, Donya Berry Paniccia…

          Skunky on January 8, 2013 at 10:27 am

          sigh… what is your IQ? im talking about the stupid mother

          SyrianRebel on January 8, 2013 at 3:42 pm

        Syrian,
        Truth gives islam a bad name. In the enlightened (a/k/a civilized) world, we value truth to shape our understanding, decisions and policy for the betterment of mankind. Islam like naziism must obfuscate truth through lies and intimidation, the earmarks of brutish, ignorant, backward cultures throughout human history.

        You may not like islam, but you are clearly a product of it. Your vulgar, brutish response to Debbie for having shown the light of truth on this issue, reflects the disability of your upbringing which clearly left you intellectually inadequate to thoughtfully engage on the topic.

        However, take heart. As you distance yourself from islam, with your ability to read and some self-discipline, you too, yes even you, can join the civilized world. Clean up your act and act like a mensch.

        I wish you all the best.

        Pete on January 8, 2013 at 12:08 pm

          SyrianRebel= Obama???

          Concerned Citizen on January 8, 2013 at 12:41 pm

WTF are u complaint about DS? A wild animal as been caged, and her offspring that would have become a threat to humanity JUST like her has been neutralized. First prize for all involved

Scarlet on January 7, 2013 at 3:46 pm

    Scarlet,

    You make a good point, unfortunately…

    As goes, so goes on January 7, 2013 at 4:19 pm

Syrian- Better get back to your sheep, it’s starting to make a break for it.

That woman did nothing to bring up a fine child, she only managed to put him in the ground. Silver lining- one less fanatical baby factory on the streets.

Robert on January 7, 2013 at 3:48 pm

And this tells us something about the koran. Presumably, Sara Ege has, herself, learned the koran, and follows its teachings dilgently, herself. So murder of your child is clearly endorsed by the koran.

Little Al on January 7, 2013 at 3:51 pm

Then I guess honor killing makes one Superman.

I_AM_ME on January 7, 2013 at 4:21 pm

No Jewish mother ever beat their child to death for not learning the Torah fast enough.

Jonathan E. Grant on January 7, 2013 at 4:24 pm

    I’d sooner be an atheist than a follower of a death cult like Islam.

    There are decent people who are atheists. There are no decent followers of ol’ Mo.

    I rest my case.

    NormanF on January 7, 2013 at 5:08 pm

      To that, NORM! I say…

      Baruch haShem. Amen.

      There is no god. There is no prophet. So f*** off, Islamaholics.

      The Reverend Jacques on January 8, 2013 at 1:23 am

      Norman-

      There are no decent followers of ol’ Mo.

      That simply isn’t true. You greatly oversimplify the situation- and make critics of Islam look foolish- by posting such inane comments, which display such a poor grasp of human psychology. I even personally know decent Muslims, including a man who would never consider beating his wife or murdering his children.

      They are, however, decent human beings despite their adherence to their ancestral religion, not because of it.

      Larry S. on January 8, 2013 at 12:26 pm

        Generalizations aren’t always correct.

        The problem is with Islam, it does hold true and the Koran is a hateful, supremacist and violent book. If you literally believe in all its tenets there is no way you can love infidels let alone fellow Muslims!

        The few Muslims who are decent have disregarded or interpreted Islamic teachings in such a way that they can be decent people. Such people want their children to grow up to respect and love others. This is not typical in the Muslim World.

        Savagery is taken for granted and bestiality, sodomy, rape and mass murder and general misanthropy have been sanctioned by Islamic clerics. Facts are stubborn things. Some human beings can live on sheer hate. It doesn’t make them want to be like us. And people who think they can pay with their lives for that mistaken assumption.

        Ergo – Islam is not a civilization in any commonly accepted meaning of that term.

        NormanF on January 8, 2013 at 3:47 pm

the judge should go through what the boy did, then have him speak about the woman. If he was beaten in the same way he would not bend over for muslims

john on January 7, 2013 at 4:27 pm

is any human
stupid enough
to ever travel to uk

this is all reason to never go
if the uk wants to pander to
the islamic pigs

may they long
wallow withthem

prestigio on January 7, 2013 at 5:13 pm

Afe you freaking kidding me, this dhimmi judge in Britian is goin easy and soft on this devout Muslim for beating her son to death because he forgot certains texts in the Koran? I don’t know if Great Britian has a ”Separation of Faith and State” within their laws? In a secular society, NO religion should get special-treatment.

And at the sametime, about a month ago, in Las Vegas, NV, two deviut Christian patents beat their son to death because he forgtot books and scriptures in the Bible and kept forgetting to do his homework, and they to wete charged with murder, just as this Muslim mother should be charged with murder by killing her 7 year old son!

”A nation is defined by it’s borders, language & culture”!

Sean R. on January 7, 2013 at 5:44 pm

    Sean, the woman was charged and convicted of murder. She didn’t have the charge reduced for any reason, certainly not religion. The judge (in Wales, actually, not England) sentenced her to life imprisonment with the instruction that she serve a minimum of 17 years.

    Alison on January 7, 2013 at 6:06 pm

      Alison, life should be life. She should never see the light of day again outside of a prison compound. Her final exit should be in a coffin after she has died of old age. I do not care a whit about the emotional state of a child murderer and grossly abusive mother. There are people who have mistakes or overreacted to situations that they found themselves in. There were no mistake made or, a spontaneous reaction here. The mother had been abusing her son for a very long time, and the outcome of her actions was very predictable. If the U.K. had not abandoned Capital Punishment in the 1960’s, this woman would have been an ideal candidate for it. The article indicated not the slightest remorse on the part of the mother. Genuine contrition warrants mercy. That woman had none.

      Worry01 on January 8, 2013 at 2:38 pm

This woman should be hung.

Ghostwriter on January 7, 2013 at 6:07 pm

    Ghostwriter,

    Yes, the vermin should be hung. She will do half her sentence with timeoff for good behavior. So, she will do 8 or 9 years.

    What does this mean? Her son’s life is a mere inconvenience. And, her life is MORE VALUABLE than his…

    It is not justice.

    As goes, so goes on January 8, 2013 at 11:48 am

I would think you all Conservadims would be jumping for joy that Sara killed a potential Al-Quaida member/suicide bomber!

Lee on January 7, 2013 at 6:17 pm

    Upper-case Lee, it’s SO nice to hear from you.

    This case is another useful example of the Religion of Peace. That is its function.

    But no, I do not mourn the offspring’s death, and I cheer the mother’s incarceration, as I presume that means she will not produce more offspring.

    skzion on January 7, 2013 at 7:07 pm

    It is a nice bit of libel Lee, but it does not wash. This is also a rather sick way of avoiding the actual topic. Do you approve of what the mother did? This woman did not get up one day and murder her child out of the blue.

    Worry01 on January 7, 2013 at 9:45 pm

Other than the ending, how did you like the play, Mrs. Lincoln? Judge’s logic.

JeffT on January 7, 2013 at 6:18 pm

This world is a sick one with many sicko, deviant, dysfunctional beasts that bring shame to the human race. It’s only gonna get worse.

And that doesn’t even include the Mooooooslims. Their type of satanic dysfunction & deviancy really turn the turd. And if I haven’t gotten to them, I haven’t gotten to the freakish dhimmis who aid and abet these monsters to do what they do.

This column has made me very sick and sad. I am always sorry to see innocent babies and animals treated inhumanely. It breaks my heart.

Skunky on January 7, 2013 at 6:19 pm

Stop beating up on Britain! Only the Brits provide employment opportunities for perverts and retards in the justice system.

Lee (above) – you stand a good chance of getting a job there.

Nir Leiu on January 7, 2013 at 6:23 pm

    Nir, “Lee” (Capital L) is like most Liberals and doesn’t understand the nuances of the problem with Islam.

    Part of that is (other than being a Libtard…obviously) because along with just emotional thinking (a real girly thing) he is resistant to all the hard work of DS and her columns.

    When one won’t even allow themselves to even gander at certain material, it makes it that much more difficult for the conclusion to permeate the empty brain cavity. That’s the gist with “Lee”.

    And I agree with you. He should go to Jolly Olde England.

    Skunky on January 7, 2013 at 6:42 pm

They are like animals. It is not worth discuss this issue.

Arturo on January 7, 2013 at 6:50 pm

She was a great mom, it’s just that she treated her son worse than an animal.
Kind of scary to think that idiot judges like this are passing sentence on people these days.
Some crimes are so terrible that people would rather look away. That’s understandable for the guy in the street but for a judge it’s unforgivable.
We can do better than this and we should.

Frankz on January 7, 2013 at 7:07 pm

Muzzies don’t care what the judge says. They want the woman stoned because she killed a boy. If she’d killed a girl they wouldn’t give a rat’s ass.

CornCoLeo on January 7, 2013 at 9:13 pm

    Good point!!

    As goes, so goes on January 8, 2013 at 11:51 am

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3528/hagel-nomination-iran
President Obama’s nomination of Chuck Hagel as Secretary of Defense risks increasing the likelihood that Iran will develop nuclear weapons. It poses that risk because Hagel is well known for his opposition both to sanctions against Iran and to employing the military option if necessary.

These views are inconsistent with the very different views expressed by President Obama. The President has emphasized on numerous occasions that he will never allow Iran to develop nuclear weapons and will use military force if necessary to prevent that “game changer.”

The nomination of Hagel thus sends a mixed message to the mullahs in Tehran, who will likely interpret it as a change from a red light to a yellow or green one when it comes to their desire to develop nuclear weapons. Sending a mixed message at this point can increase the chances that Iran will miscalculate and act in a foolhardy manner thus requiring the actual use of the military option—an eventuality that nobody wants.

The goal of America’s policy toward Iran has always been to frighten the mullahs into believing President Obama’s threat to use military force if sanctions fail. “I don’t bluff”, President Obama has famously and publicly stated. It is imperative that the Iranian leadership believe this. If they do, they may well decide that the sanctions they are currently undergoing are too painful to endure, if the end result is that they will never be permitted to develop nuclear weapons. If they don’t believe President Obama’s threat, then the sanctions alone will not dissuade them from pursuing their nuclear goal. The nomination of Senator Hagel will strengthen the hand of those within the Iranian leadership who think that President Obama is bluffing.

It is also important that the Israeli leadership believes that President Obama really has Israel’s back when it comes to preventing Iran from endangering the Jewish state by obtaining nuclear weapons. Any loss of trust in this regard may result in an Israeli decision to take unilateral military action to protect its citizens against nuclear attacks.

This is the wrong time to send mixed messages by nominating a man who has, at best, a mixed record with regard to sanctions and the military option against Iran and with regard to having Israel’s back.

Senator Hagel will have an opportunity to clarify, and hopefully to change, his previous statements with regard to these issues. He should be asked probing questions about sanctions, about the military option and about Israel’s security. In his answers he must persuade the Iranian leadership that there is no distance between his current views and those of the President who has nominated him. The President must also persuade the Iranian leadership that his nomination of Hagel does not constitute any backing down from his commitment to use military force, if sanctions don’t work.

Independence may be a virtue for a senator, but it is a vice when it presents conflicting messages at a time when it is imperative that the Iranian leadership understand that the Obama Administration, indeed the United States as a whole, speaks with one voice when it says that Iran will never be allowed to develop nuclear weapons, even if that requires the use of military force if all other options fail.

Normally a president, especially a president reelected to a second term with a substantial majority, should be entitled to pick his own Secretary of Defense. But when the President’s decision risks sending a mixed message that could increase the chances of having to employ the military option against Iran, the Senate has an especially important role to play. The burden is now on Senator Hagel to persuade the Senate, the American people, and the leaders of Iran that he is fully supportive of the President’s commitment not to contain a nuclear armed Iran, but to prevent such a catastrophe from occurring, even if that requires the use of military force to achieve that commendable goal.

Nor is this a liberal-conservative or Democratic-Republican issue. Reportedly, the Hagel nomination has been very controversial within the White House itself, with some of President Obama’s closest advisers being critical of it. Many Democrats, both elected officials and rank and file voters, are deeply concerned about the wisdom of the President’s nomination of Senator Hagel. Neither is this an issue that concerns only Jewish or pro-Israel voters. There are serious policy issues at stake here. Those of us who voted for President Obama and who want to be certain that Iran is never allowed to develop nuclear weapons, as the President promised, have legitimate concerns about this nomination. We hope that these concerns can be allayed by the President and his nominee, but if they are not, it will be the highest of patriotic duties to oppose Senator Hagel’s nomination

Simon on January 7, 2013 at 9:33 pm

    Simon, Brett Winterble just made a great point that took my eye off of the shiny object of Hagel.

    He said that the nomination of Brennan is really the one that can do severe damage and that perhaps Obama-Putin set up another shiny object (Hagel) to distract from Brennan so that Brennan can slip through with ease.

    If that is true it’s working. Both are horrible but BW opened my eyes when I was looking at the wrong devil. Yikes!

    Skunky on January 7, 2013 at 10:11 pm

Sara Ege’s fainting routine was priceless. To her, being tried for the murder of her child for not learning the Koran was the real injustice. I doubt that many Muslims, if they answered honestly, would find fault with her motives. The backwardness of such people does not disappear even when they relocate to a Western country. It is even passed down as if it were a family heirloom.

The judge involved demonstrated an extreme fecklessness in making that devoted and caring mum remark. This remark was uncalled for and utterly unprofessional.

Worry01 on January 7, 2013 at 9:56 pm

I noticed a lot of you insulted me, but none of you disagreed with my point. You are sad for how the boy was treated but don’t care he is dead! England is a great country and if you think its an insult to tell me to move than you are the retards!!!!

Lee on January 7, 2013 at 10:21 pm

    Lee, please go live in England. We want you to. You’ll love the pandering to Islam and their horrible National Health Care where they kill the young and old to save $$$.

    How can you understand where some are coming from on here when you don’t even understand the horrors of Islam? You’re the one that takes yourself out of being a contender because you fail to face reality.

    That little boy did not (yet) understand what his evil mother was doing to him. NO innocent child should have to endure that satanic abuse…especially since the abuse is for naught regarding a fraud and illegitimate religion. That child was just a baby (at the time) and NO ONE would stand by and watch that monster who gave birth to him beat him like he was nothing. They’d stop her and take him out of Islam (hopefully, but even that isn’t 100%…or even 25%!!!)

    And you can’t get angry at those who feel in the end (if he was allowed to live the life his disgusting pig Mum took from him) that he would NOT grow up to sing Jihad.

    But he wasn’t. A Moooooslim denied him that, not anyone else.

    STFU. You think you’re above it all but your acquiescence to Islam will allow more people harmed than the people you are mistakenly judging here with your Libtard arrogant ignorance.

    Skunky on January 7, 2013 at 11:30 pm

    I’ve responded to you, Lee. Where is your response to me?

    You’re yet another troll.

    skzion on January 8, 2013 at 11:42 am

This story is extremely sad and this woman is gonna get hers someway somehow! I’d like to see the entirety of the judge’s comments before passing judgment on him (no pun intended!!).

Kershaw on January 8, 2013 at 12:11 am

First they kill girls for being to westernized and now they kill children for wanting to be children. This is Islam’s interpretation of parenting. While most parents may be disappointed at their kids for not respecting their religious values and customs, most of them are sane enough not to resort to murder and violence. They certainly do not use religion to punish their kids. People who are more prone to violence should not have children. Poor Yassen. I hope there is a special place in Hell waiting for this poor excuse for a mother. What a phucked up world we live in. My question is, where was the father? Why didn’t he intervene to protect his child?

Challah Maidel on January 8, 2013 at 4:53 am

“There is no fun in Islam” – Ayatollah Khomeini. I bet that poor murdered kid would agree.

Phil on January 8, 2013 at 9:16 am

that crap is going to happen in the usa

martin on January 8, 2013 at 10:30 am

    Muzzies are “on notice.”

    Just watch for Missing Muzzy Children in the future… And, offensive maneuvers like “crime against Islam” allegations to cover future abuse because these animals are abusive and it won’t stop.

    They are coming for the Saturday people first and the Sunday people second.

    As goes, so goes on January 8, 2013 at 11:58 am

Except for the obsession with Yaseen learning you did many fine things to bring him up as a young boy.”

And other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how did you enjoy the play?

Larry S. on January 8, 2013 at 12:14 pm

I am not muslin but I do have muslim friends. They are some of the most honest and caring people I have ever met. I’m not saying
that killing a child for not learning the Koran is good. In fact, I was appauld when I read this. However, not all muslims are like this and if you readers are Christians like I am, remember, god told us to accept everyone and forgive everyone.

SBT on January 12, 2013 at 3:50 am

    he…

    job on January 18, 2013 at 2:41 pm

Other than that, how was your trip to Dallas, Mrs. Kennedy?

Pray Hard on January 11, 2014 at 11:01 am

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field