By Debbie Schlussel

So, now, we’re learning that the reason disgraced former CIA Director David Petraeus’ extra-marital affair with Paula Broadwell (age 40) came to light is that she was e-mail harassing his younger female friend, Jill Kelley (age 37). Wow, this is gettin’ better than “Fatal Attraction.” Was Kelley another Petraeus concubine? She says no, and so does Petraeus. Whatever the case, we now know that the FBI knew about all of this back in the summer.

While it’s being reported that Kelley and her husband were close friends of the Petraesus, Broadwell certainly thought there was something going on between them, which is why Broadwell send threatening e-mails to Kelley. It begs the question: how many other chicks did this unscrupulous then-CIA Director have? He may turn out to be the White Kwame Kilpatrick . . . at least in the “dating” (euphemism) department.

What kind of CIA Director has multiple girlfriends other than his wife? Maybe this one. He does like Islam, and, hey, he’s got his own harem. Imagine the blackmail this doofus exposed himself to. If it weren’t so scary to U.S. national security, it would be comedy gold. I mean, is this guy Petraeus gonna turn out to have more mistresses than Tiger Woods? Don’t bet against it.

And the story has shown us a lot of things:

1) Whenever an author says he or she had “exclusive access” as Broadwell constantly did, you gotta ask: does that mean the author is sleeping with the subject? I mean the book she wrote is a gushing loveletter to a hayseed goober pan-Arabist in uniform who butt-snorkled Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan at the cost of thousands of American lives. And, yes, like you, I laughed at the title of the book, “All In,” which should’ve been called “All In With a Condom,” or if they didn’t use protection (which means Broadwell’s hubby now has the diseases of all the General’s chicks), then, “All In Without Protection,” which kind of describes what Petraeus did to America by using CentCom and the CIA as his personal pick-up joint, and by sending American men to build roads and hand out candy to people armed with SAMs aimed at the Americans. Insider access sometimes really means inside her access. I think there’s no question that two egomaniacs–Broadwell and Petraeus–temporarily found their soulmates. How many times must we hear about their six minute miles and how Broadwell was at the top of her class at West Point and a fitness champ. Me, me, me, me. Look at me, notice me, I’m important! Too bad Glenn Close is too old to play her in the movie.

2) Anyone who was worried that Petraeus wouldn’t be there to spout the BS he already spouted about the Benghazi consulate murders (he already blamed it on the anti-Mohammed video), well, you have something else to look forward to. I guarantee there will be hearings on Petraeus unzipped. Yup, our great Kardashified country just got even more dignified. Thanks, General.

3) You have to doubt what you read from Ronald Kessler and NewsMax and many other so-called “journalism” outlets on the right, just as you have to do the same with those on the left. For much of the weekend, Drudge had as his main headline a link to a “report” by Kessler, claiming his FBI insiders told him they were the investigators and that the investigation began as a look into corruption. Uh, WRONG. It began when Paula Broadwell sent threatening e-mails to what she believed was her Petraeus co-concubine, Jill Kelley, and Kelley reported it to a friend who is an FBI agent. NewsMax’s Kessler also claimed that Broadwell broke up with Petraeus and he sent her “thousands of e-mails” trying to get her back, which failed. WRONG again. It’s pretty clear Broadwell was still very much hot and heavy for Petraeus, but that he was either not interested or was, indeed, still having an affair with Broadwell. I mean, why else would she threaten what she thought was the other chick . . . if she broke it off with the General and ignored his e-mails trying to get her back. Clearly that isn’t what happened. Either Kessler made all of this up (which it sounds like) or his source was a fraud. Either way, his “reporting” wasn’t too accurate. Not even close. But, hey, he wrote for the New York Times for years, until they dumped him and NewsMax scooped him up from the trash bin.

It’s probably the same for NewsMax, where there’s little fact-checking or real journalism to speak of, and you can’t believe the vast majority of what you read. The right constantly complains about the left-wing mainstream media, but then serves up completely false, totally fabricated crap at places like NewsMax, WND, and Breitfraud (all of the sites of which spent two weeks covering Sean Hannity’s ass when my story broke that he committed the Freedom Concert fraud – the three Breitfraud sites all backed Sean Vannity’s claim that he paid for his private planes, his posse’s fancy suites and vehicles, etc., and yet never ever obtained or demanded any receipts or financial records . . . because they show otherwise). (Conservative News Service did the same, because it’s owned by Hannity buddy Brent Bozell, Jr.)

Breitfraud chief Joel Pollak repeatedly tweeted what a great guy and friend of Israel Nelson Mandela is, something only a complete ignoramus or liar would say (he’s both). It’s well known that Mandela is a Jew-hating, anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian piece of crap, despite the fact that dhimmi Jews helped him during Apartheid. Pollak just doesn’t know what he’s talking about or care about the facts, and again, he heads Breitfraud. That’s not to mention that for weeks, the Breitfraud sites ran the “work” of Jeff Dunetz, who goes by the deceptive name “Yid With Lid” (he’s not a religious Jew), attacking Anthony Weiner’s exposing himself on Twitter, all while Dunetz knew that he, himself, had posted his own masturbation video online and sent it to women other than his wife, in addition to apparently rating the prostitutes he patronized. (He used the fake name “Sammy Benoit” for some time, as well as “Gridney,” in order to evade detection.)

Yup, you cannot believe these people and you have to question their motives . . . whether it’s Paula Broadwell, whose “work” appeared in the New York Times or things you read on these “conservative” sites, which simply lie to get their own slice of the Drudge links and traffic. Whose itch are they scratching? It usually isn’t an arms length, journalistically ethical relationship. And what they’re serving up isn’t fact or accurate.

Bottom line: I doubt Broadwell is the only one. She’s just the most mentally unstable concubine. David Petraeus didn’t just start doing this at age 60–or 59, since he only recently celebrated his birthday.

So, how many chicks did this arrogant fool have on the side? You can bet I’m not the only one asking. His wife is, too.

Aren’t you glad this guy wasn’t the Republican nominee for President, as Roger Ailes and Peter King and William Kristol and others wanted? The information would have come out, and Obama would have won in a landslide.