May 26, 2009, - 3:37 pm

Your Day in “Religion of Peace” Intra-“Peacefulness”

By Debbie Schlussel
As I’ve said over and over and over again, they can’t be peaceful amongst themselves or even amongst individual Shi’ite and Sunni sects (let along between those sects). Yet, we expect Israel and ourselves to make peace with and be “tolerant” of them. The absurdity and irony is so thick you can cut it with an Islamic beheading sword.
FYI, Dagestan is a region of southern Russia.

The Coordination Center of North Caucasus Muslims has linked the murder of Ahmed Tagayev, deputy head of the Dagestani Muslim Spiritual Board and head of the public organization called Za Nravstvennost (For Ethics), to his professional activities, and in particular, his opposition to radical Islam.
The mufti linked Tagayev’s murder to his professional activities, “as he was strong opponent of Wahhabism.”

islamiccrescent.jpg

“Religion of Peace”

The Coordination Center of North Caucasus Muslims will soon hold a meeting, where it will raise the issue of how to protect Islamic clergy from extremists, he said.

Correction: Islamic clergy are extremists. They just want to be protected from rival extremists.

Tagayev was killed in Makhachkala on Monday.
This is not the first such incident in Dagestan. In November 2008, an attack was made against the Dagestan mufti’s advisor, Sultan Sultanmagomedov, and his driver. Both sustained shrapnel wounds from the explosion. Urmagomed Gajimagomedov, a servant from a local mosque and a vocal opponent of extremists, was killed in October 2007.
There are up to one hundred of subvertionists and around 1,500 Wahabis in the republic, Dagestan’s Interior Ministry said last autumn.

Don’t kid yourself and believe–as claimed by the Interfax news agency in this artic–that Tagayev, the Deputy Chief Mufti of Dagestan, was some sort of moderate merely because he opposed Wahhabist Islam and was shot by them.
The guy was extremist as most Muslim clerics are, just not on the same extremist side as the Wahhabis are. Most strains of Islam are extremist, and most are opposed to each other.
Like I said, they can’t get along with each other, but we’re supposed to get along with them.






7 Responses

And, these are the 7th century savage barbarians that Hussein Obama thinks he can reason with.
We’re in for some real trouble in this country. The muzlums all over the world (and in this country) view Hussein Obama as weak and being a useful idiot….and, they’re correct. Everytime he extends his hand to our enemies, they spit in it. Castro did; Russia did; China did; North Korea did; Iran did; al-Qaeda in Iraq did; al-Qaeda and the Taliban in Afghanistan did. So far his “Blame America World Tour” has only emboldened our enemies. This almost makes you nostalgic for the Jimmy Carter years.

Thee_Bruno on May 26, 2009 at 4:06 pm

Islam is extremist because moderates threaten its definitive character. Those who understand Islam cannot be reformed have either left its ranks or have wound up dead. A “moderate” Islamist is therefore an oxymoron. And until we really understand that Islam does live by the sword, we will not be able to overcome it – not in Russia, not in America, not in Israel and not anywhere in the world.

NormanF on May 26, 2009 at 4:35 pm

Islam hasn’t caught on in the rest of the world is not for lack of trying. It would behoove people to remember these are not quietist spiritualists we’re dealing with but fanatics who live to destroy what they cannot create. And Islam seems unable to create peaceful converts much less than have its followers live in peace with each other. That is why it will not be able to conquer the rest of humanity outright and its last days of glory were the Ottoman Empire and its been downhill for Islam ever since.

NormanF on May 26, 2009 at 4:48 pm

[Thee_Bruno: This almost makes you nostalgic for the Jimmy Carter years.]
I came to the conclusion myself a couple of months ago that we are going to wish things were only as bad as they were under Jimmy Carter.

i_am_me on May 26, 2009 at 4:54 pm

Son of a …. What is wrong with people

mindy1 on May 27, 2009 at 7:02 am

Degenerate Islamophobia vs. Common Sense
It is quite annoying to hear Islamofascist rants like “behead those who insult Islam” or “America deserved 9/11.” It is just as annoying to hear Islamophobic rants like “kill the Muzzies” or “Nuke Mekkah.” But it’s twice as annoying when this kind of a sentiment emanates from public figures.
Muslims Against Sharia proudly consider ourselves to be members of anti-Islamist community. As Muslims, some of have a first-hand experience of living under Islamist oppression. And we know all too well what the stakes are in the fight with Islamofascism.
However, some anti-Islamists are so consumed by hatred, that Islamofascists do not present a large enough target for them; they hate all Muslims. They rationalize their hate by claiming that all Muslims are the same and there are no moderate Muslims. “Bill Warner, an Islamophobe from Florida (not to be confused with Bill Warner, the director of the Center for the Study of Political Islam) sums it up pretty well: “I (Bill Warner) totally agree with Debbie Schlussel , she hit the nail right on the head again, it is all a fraud, a Muslim fraud, there are no Moderate Muslims.”
The good thing is that nobody really listens to Bill Warner, especially after he became a laughing stock when this self-proclaimed anti-Gihadist teamed up with CAIR lackey Jim Sutter and Islamofascist MT Akbar in a pathetic attempt to defame Khalim Massoud of MASH and Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs. The bad thing is that people listen to Debbie Schlussel. I used to listen to her too. Debbie has done some great work exposing government’s ties with Islamofascists. Unfortunately, this is not all she has done.
Putting aside her tendency to defame other anti-Islamists who don’t see eye-to-eye with Debbie (she regularly calls Steven Emerson, Brigitte Gabriel, John Loftus, and Walid Shoebat liars and frauds) or her tendency to think that she is the only true conservative diva (she nearly bit the head off one of her commenter’s head, because she dared to say that Laura Ingraham is a conservative; Monica Crowley, according to Debbie, is a no-talent phony,) Debbie doesn’t see any difference between Muslims and Islamofascist.
May 25, 2009 was a dark day for anti-Islamist Muslims. Dagestan’s Deputy Mufti, Akhmed-khadzhi Tagayev was murdered, presumably by Wahhabi terrorists. Ahmed Tagaev was known for his anti-extremist stance. He has repeatedly written about problems of Islamic extremism in his articles in local media and online.
But Debbie doesn’t see it that way. In her demented rant, “Your Day in “Religion of Peace” Intra-“Peacefulness”,” Debbie writes: “Don’t kid yourself and believe–as claimed by the Interfax news agency in this artic–that Tagayev, the Deputy Chief Mufti of Dagestan, was some sort of moderate merely because he opposed Wahhabist Islam and was shot by them. The guy was extremist as most Muslim clerics are, just not on the same extremist side as the Wahhabis are.” I wonder how well she knew Ahmed Tagaev. I knew him, and he was no extremist. He was fighting extremists and he paid the ultimate price, but for Debbie he’s just another dead Muslim. Shouldn’t the thought that CAIR and ISNA are probably quietly rejoicing the death of their enemy at least give her a pause? I doubt that. For people like Debbie, the only good Muslim is a dead Muslim.
Commenting on “The Coordination Center of North Caucasus Muslims will soon hold a meeting, where it will raise the issue of how to protect Islamic clergy from extremists,” Debbie writes: “Correction: Islamic clergy are extremists.” Granted, vast majority of Islamic clergy in America are extremists. Extremists paid for by Wahhabi petrodollars. The same Wahhabi petrodollars that Ahmed Tagaev was fighting against. Would Debbie also characterize Sheikh Prof. Abdul Hadi Palazzi, an Islamic cleric who is more pro-Israel than most American Jews, as an extremist?
Suppose Debbie is seething with Islamophobia so much, she can’t help herself, but rejoice every time a Muslim dies. But how about some common sense? Will attitude like hers make on-the-fence Muslims think, “hey, those anti-Islamists are not that bad, they are against Islamism, not against Muslim” or would they think, “Osama is right; they hate all Muslims and we have to defend ourselves”? Doesn’t she understand that she may be doing more harm than good when it comes to the War on Terror? Or does she care as long as her self-righteousness is satisfied?

Muslims Against Sharia on May 28, 2009 at 11:11 am

I was very surprised to see our post about Debbie up. whether you love her or hate her, you gotta admit: she’s got balls.
Khalim Massoud
President
Muslims Against Sharia

Muslims Against Sharia on May 29, 2009 at 8:14 am

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field