What country (cuntry?) is this woman from? Which is Shirley–the butch or the fem lesbian?
The butch in the picture could have passed for male on an ID card–IMO.
I notice People never calls them “illegal aliens,” using the standard ploy–just call them “immigrants.”
You are right on this 100%, DS.

BB on April 21, 2009 at 5:18 pm

Wasn’t this a Drew Carey storyline???

MarySJ on April 21, 2009 at 5:57 pm

I’d really like to see our government do away with the concept of automatic citizenship for an anchor-baby. Yes, I know I’m dreaming.

pascobear on April 21, 2009 at 5:58 pm

Way back when I ruined my life by joining the border patrol, prostitutes/alcoholics/drug addicts/sexual deviates AND HOMOSEXUALS were excludable at entry. But these days we are ‘progressive’ and understanding…makes me puke. Do whatever you want to do, but keep it to yourself.

#1Vato on April 21, 2009 at 6:41 pm

Gay marriage is an abomination as it says in the Torah (Leviticus talks about homosexuality itself, actually).
I commend that Miss California for sticking to her guns about gay marriage even though it cost her the Miss USA crown.
That Perez Hilton should be relieved of his (her?) duties as a judge for his biased and incorrect formulations.
Between that CNN newscaster ridiculing the Tea parties as “tea bagging” and Perez Hilton’s foul mouthed rant, it makes me thing homosexuality is a mental illness despite the cowardice of the APA on this when they took homosexuality off the DSM list due to threats against the psychiatrists.

Underzog on April 21, 2009 at 8:50 pm

That is no woman!! Is he the father of the twins? I’m all confused here.

lexi on April 21, 2009 at 9:39 pm

[Way back when I ruined my life by joining the border patrol, prostitutes/alcoholics/drug addicts/sexual deviates AND HOMOSEXUALS were excludable at entry.Posted by: #1Vato]
When will America have the guts to deport undesirables like neo-nazis?
[…is that people will abuse this to get green cards and U.S. citizenship.]
That’s a ridiculous reason. If we can live with the immigration problems of heterosexual marriages then we can do the same for homosexual marriages. It’s not as big a deal as you think Debbie. And with homosexual marriages, you don’t have to worry about anchor babies now do you Debbie?
[NB: YES, YOU DO HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT ANCHOR BABIES FROM GAYS, WITH OR WITHOUT GAY MARRIAGE. THERE ARE TWO IDENTIFIED IN THIS POST, WHICH YOU APPARENTLY DIDN’T READ THAT CLOSELY. DS]

Norman Blitzer on April 21, 2009 at 10:40 pm

FWIW I think you completely missed Norman B’s point. As I understand it he’s arguing that the effects of homosexual marriage on immigration policy are no worse than the effects of heterosexual marriage on immigration policy. But f course, that argument is entirely too reasonable. So go beat the crap out of that strawman!

FeynmanFanGirl on April 21, 2009 at 11:40 pm

Debbie, you are so right. In Orange County California or Los Angeles or King County Washington it is common for pregnant Koreans to have a “anchor baby” or “tourist baby” so their beloved male baby wont have to serve in the Korean military. If you are born a Korean citizen you MUST serve an inscription to the Korean government. Well Korean mothers don’t want their children to serve this inscription and will have said baby in United States. So we must guard the DMZ with American soldiers to defend those who wont sacrifice for themselves? Unbelievable.

californiascreaming on April 22, 2009 at 12:52 am

How is this any different than what’s already happening with heterosexual marriage? The vast majority of green card marriages (heterosexual ones even) are business arrangements and have nothing to do with love. Then you quote a story about a gay couple who are not trying to game the system, as proof that homosexuals will game the system? You didn’t think this through very well did you?
It’s pretty apparent that your motivations have less to do with border security and more to do with disliking gays, that’s fine you’re hardly alone but next time just say so rather than trying to draw these elaborate cover stories for your bigotry.
[S: NICE TRY, BUT NO CIGAR. CLEARLY, YOU ARE NOT A REGULAR READER OF THIS SITE. I’VE BEEN VERY CRITICAL OF HETEROSEXUAL MARRIAGE FRAUD FOR GREEN CARDS, ETC. HERE’S JUST ONE EXAMPLE OF MANY:
http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2006/06/ticket_to_ride.html
DS]

Scabies on April 22, 2009 at 9:51 am

Fair enough, but if the problem is with green card marriage fraud in general then that’s what should be addressed, denying equal rights to homosexuals because they may commit the same fraud that heterosexuals do is just thinking about it all wrong. By that logic heterosexuals shouldn’t be able to get married either for the sake of border security.

Scabies on April 22, 2009 at 11:40 am

First, all illegals are criminals and should be deported immediately and leave with only that which they entered the country illegally.
Secondly, there should be strict fines for homosexuals who come here illegally and have illegimate children because (1) they are living in great sin; (2) they are doing violence against the children they have; and (3) they set a poor example for everyone around them, especially their children’s classmates and parents.

Lilly on April 23, 2009 at 9:54 pm

The Old Testament also says that women should not be permitted to talk in church. Should we follow that too? The bible does not show proof against homosexuality. Furthermore, if you want to argue the Sodom scene is proof against it, I can show you equivalent proof for it.
Your blog post is not objective at all, I never read anything from you before, and everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but you clearly have an aversion towards homosexuals. You wrote, “Well, ya know, chickie (at least, we think that’s what you are), you had 23 years to figure that out.”
But that’s not prejudice? How can you even be taken seriously?

beeper on April 26, 2009 at 2:46 pm

Email the editors of PEOPLE magazine at editor@people.com — Or call 1-212-522-6699

FeFe on May 3, 2009 at 7:42 pm

Trash on homosexuals regardless of whether they can change and their brain is possibly hardwired since they respond to pheromones (sexual odors) like the opposite sex. The odd biological statistics involving twins only have a 53% chance they are both gay so it cannot be completely natural right!? Therefore continuing to leave them tempted by promiscuous behavior without God is obviously for their own good and exactly what Jesus would do; this is the heterosexual agenda and generally involves rich people who have never seen the problems this would has the offer. Do not fret for this is not your problem and therefore will not hurt you.

Mudkipzlol on May 31, 2011 at 4:50 am