March 23, 2012, - 1:38 pm

HUH? Hillary, Barack Waive Democracy Requiremts to Give Billions to Muslim Bro’Hood Egypt

By Debbie Schlussel

All hail the Egypt “democracy” movement.  Oh, wait, there is no democracy there.  Just Muslim Brotherhood control of the country.  No matter, not to Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Rodham Cankles, who’ve decided that doesn’t matter, even though it’s a requirement to get foreign aid.  If we’re gonna give foreign aid to these Islamo-cretinous fascists no matter what they do, then we have no sway with them and there’s no point in giving them our money, is there?  Hussein and Cankles don’t care.  They’re givin’ it–$1.3 billion in U.S. aid–away anyway.  So much for our votes for Members of Congress, who imposed this law.   The Hussein  Cankles foreign policy (and domestic, too) doesn’t listen to the democratic exercises here,  so I guess it’s only fitting they waive the same for Egypt.

obamasmiling.jpghillaryclinton.jpg

A Foreign Policy of Giving American Pearls to America-Hating Al-Swine


Egypt’s New “Democratic” Muslim Brotherhood Parliament

The Obama administration on Friday formally released $1.3 billion in military aid for Egypt despite Cairo’s failure to meet pro-democracy goals, saying U.S. national security required continued military assistance.


Uh-huh, and a healthy diet requires arsenic.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton waived congressional conditions imposed late last year that tied U.S. aid to progress in Egypt’s transition to democracy following the ouster of longtime President Hosni Mubarak.

Yup, that Hussein-Cankles-imposed ouster was just terrific for America!

“These decisions reflect America’s over-arching goal: to maintain our strategic partnership with an Egypt made stronger and more stable by a successful transition to democracy,” State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said in a statement.

Clinton’s decision, which has been criticized by some U.S. lawmakers, took note of Egypt’s progress since last year’s street revolution, including holding parliamentary elections and preparing for a presidential election in May.

But a crackdown on pro-democracy forces – including some U.S. groups – over the last several months infuriated lawmakers in Washington and caused the Obama administration to warn Egypt that its aid might be in peril.

Speak loudly and carry a toothpick!

Political analysts said the U.S. move showed that Washington still hopes to maintain its influence with Cairo, although they said these hopes may be misaligned with the political transition occurring in the country.

Um, no. It showed the U.S. has no balls and can’t be taken seriously. It shows we are more than willing to fund the jihadists who hate us. They are laughing at us all the way to the bank … and the mosque.

“They keep banking on the military as our partner in Egypt, and that does not comport with the reality in Egypt now,” said Michele Dunne, director of the Rafik Hariri Center for the Middle East at the Atlantic Council.

HUH??? Um, the military was Mubarak, you morons. The military is the “anti-democratic” force the Muslim Brotherhood and the others are trying to overthrow and will soon. If you wanted the military as our partner, you’d have kept Mubarak in power. G-d, these people are idiots.

And the moronism gets worse:

U.S. officials said the decision to release the aid also avoided disruption of existing defense contracts, which could have led to expensive termination costs that could have exceeded $2 billion.

Ah, yes, we need to continue those weapons shipments to the Muslim Brotherhood. Are these people insane?! Sadly, yes.

Clinton further certified that Egypt is meeting its obligations under its peace treaty with Israel, an additional requirement for U.S. aid to flow.

WTF?! No, it isn’t. The border with Israel is as unpeaceful as ever, with Muslims constantly blowing up pipelines and threatening neighboring Jews’ lives, including fomenting terrorist attacks, like the murderous hit on a schoolbus, last year, that killed a teen boy. Incredible.

Even uber-liberals, like Patrick Leahy, think this is crazy!

Some U.S. lawmakers have criticized the move, saying it was inappropriate to waive conditions on military aid while the Egyptian government’s transition was so uncertain.

Senator Patrick Leahy, the Democratic chairman of the Senate subcommittee on foreign aid who wrote the law imposing conditions on aid, said the United States should release no more money than is “demonstrably necessary.” . . .

The law still requires Clinton to consult congressional appropriators before any funds are actually transferred to Egypt, and U.S. officials said they would be keeping a careful eye on Egypt’s political development.

“We have the flexibility to adjust what is being disbursed out of this assistance and we obviously … will be watching the situation on the ground to decide if we need to exercise that flexibility at any time,” one senior U.S. official said.

“Flexibility?” What is this–a gymnastics routine? There is no “flexibility” needed. Anyone with a brain is rigid on this: no aid to the Muslim Brotherhood. Period.

Will Etchy Sketchy Romney be different?  Don’t count on it.




Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


25 Responses

And if we’re going to give aid, we should at least condition it on the Muslim Brotherhood proving it is changing and sincere about democracy.

The point being, they are the ones who should change and not us. That’s the way any normal self-respecting country conducts its foreign policy: to advance its national interests.

So we’re throwing away what little leverage we have over Egypt by giving an unreformed MB a blank check! That’s insane.

But in the world of President Obama and Secretary Clinton what America needs is completely unimportant and its more important we throw Israel by extension, under the bus. Yup, the Islamists are laughing at us all the way to the bank… and the mosque!

Being a good dhimmi is not a good day for America.

NormanF on March 23, 2012 at 1:49 pm

you have to remember that these two closet queens hate jews and america because they are commie traitors just like their parents.bongos granfather spent the war in leaven worth because he was a commie traitor as we all know rotten apples do not fall far from the tree.i would like to see them tried and hanged for treason.

BRUCE on March 23, 2012 at 2:08 pm

A few weeks ago I read on a Egyptian-Arabic website that the new Parliment members (ie, the Muslim Brotherhood) declared Isreal as their number one enemy. What disgusted me more was that just about all of the dumbass dhimmi posters and islamist posters ate up the Muslim Brotherhoods anti-Israel talking points “lock-step-in-barrel” like the useful-idiots they are.

And were the hell is the money coming from? I thought this country was broke? Continue to rob the US treasury and send billions of dollars to the Muslim Brotherhood (who we have NOTHING in common with BTW), we all know Bush bankrupted the treasury with his worthless and wasteful spending, etc., but Obama is making matters a little worst, and a certain talk show host refered Obama to “King Ludwig II of Bavaria”!

“A nation is defined by its borders, language & culture!”

Sean R. on March 23, 2012 at 2:10 pm

Egypt is not so gradually becoming an Islamic state. As the United States distances itself from Israel, Egypt will gradually lose its inhibitions about attacking Israel. We are funding a build-up that could eventually be used against Israel by furnishing this assistance with virtually no strings attached.

Worry01 on March 23, 2012 at 2:23 pm

    Worry,

    3 great minds think alike You, Debbie and yours truly here.

    That is just what I was thinking and what we’re doing makes no sense whatsoever.

    But try explaining that to clueless morons in Washington who haven’t a clue as to what’s actually going on in Egypt or for that matter, in the Middle East.

    NormanF on March 23, 2012 at 2:28 pm

SeanR,

We are broke. That said, I wrote we should be serious about our principles and we expect the same from whoever is helped by us. That’s just common sense, right?

If we now think those principles are too burdensome, then we have no business giving ANY money to the Muslim Brotherhood. Period.

In short, how can we obtain others’ respect when we don’t even respect ourselves? In world affairs, its always far better to be feared than to be loved.

The MB would have still hated us if we had the courage to tell them “no” but they would also have respected us for being true to our own beliefs.

That’s the way I feel about the issue: they shouldn’t be getting a dime from us but if we still feel compelled to send Egypt something, making them work for the aid we’d send them would have been in their best interests and in ours as well.

NormanF on March 23, 2012 at 2:23 pm

Cankles?!? Bwaahahaha! That’s good. 🙂

Patrick AKA DetroitRight on twitter on March 23, 2012 at 2:29 pm

Well, 80% of Egyptians voted for Shariah, and if a majority of a country votes for an undemocratic party and that undemocratic party imposes what their voters voted for, is it undemocratic?

Problem is not Obama/Hillary waiving the requirements on democracy – it’s them requiring it in the first place, and enabling the ouster of Mubarak – very reminiscent of Dhimmi Carter acquiescing in the ouster of the Shah of Iran. Obama has repeated that manifold – in Tunisia, Libya and Egypt, and is in the process of trying it in Syria. Essentially, the US is enabling some 22 Arab countries, and potentially, some 50 odd Muslim countries to become its enemies.

Infidel on March 23, 2012 at 2:30 pm

While we’re still at it…

Let’s give arsonists and pyromaniacs more matches and gasoline.

Let’s put vampires in charge of the blood banks.

Let an alcoholic run a liquor store.

Let’s put pedophiles in charge of kindergartens.

Your Regime is sure showing signs of good logic. I’ll be ready for the upcoming Apocalypse when you need me.

The Reverend Jacques on March 23, 2012 at 2:39 pm

Infidel, it may be true we have to live with disagreeable governments we don’t like.

My problem with it is the Rah Rah Rah Hooray for the Muslim Brotherhood cheerleading approach from Obamaites. Its like saying we don’t care that you’re radical, you believe in jihad and hate Israel and the West and you’ll oppress your own minorities and women. In fact, we’ll help you do that and overlook your totalitarian nature. Its simply quite disgusting and goes in the face of every American value and interest in the Middle East.

A realpolitik approach would have said ok, we recognize that you won the recent elections in Egypt but here’s what we are going to expect that you do the following things to prove your democratic bonafides: you prove your commitment to democracy in word and deed, you renounce jihad as a means of political change, you keep your peace agreement with Israel and we expect you to conduct civilized relations with the West. Moreover, we’ll demand that you grant equal rights to minorities and treat your women with respect and if you do those things, we’ll be your partner in democracy building. If you don’t, we’ll oppose you and take such measures as we see fit to protect our national interests and those of our allies.

That is what we should be doing vis a vis the MB but we aren’t. How can we expect them to moderate if we make no demands of them like I outlined? The Obama version of the foreign policy we are currently pursuing will lead to a catastrophe in the Middle East. In short, the Islamic Pompeii is boiling in Egypt. We had better all pray that we are not hit with the fallout when it blows.

NormanF on March 23, 2012 at 2:46 pm

What difference does it make if Egypt is a democracy? They vote for the Muslim Brotherhood anyway. Funny, just about the time Michelle Obama was becoming proud of her country, I began losing pride in mine.

L: Exactly. Makes no difference. But we should at least use portions of our law–and all parts of the brain–to withhold any and all money from these scumbags. Hillary and Obama flout even the laws set by Congress regarding this aid and “democracy.” DS

Louie Louie on March 23, 2012 at 2:52 pm

I guess Mrs. Clinton and the age old state Department remember when Nasser went with the Russkies rather than deal with the US way back then.

“U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton waived congressional conditions imposed late last year that tied U.S. aid to progress in Egypt’s transition to democracy following the ouster of longtime President Hosni Mubarak.”

The transition is “democracy”, or mob rule, by the MB.

G_d help Egypt.

Panhandle on March 23, 2012 at 3:13 pm

Anyone with a brain knows that “democracy” in Egypt is gonna goes as smashingly as it did in Iraq and Afghanistan.

As I have said before…it really is NOT ok that we didn’t understand Islamic jihad on September 10th, 2001.

But what is really heinous is that some people still don’t get it 11 years after 9/11. There is NO EXCUSE FOR THAT STUPIDITY.

DS has been proven correct back and forth a billion times and people STILL want to see her as being too hasty, too hardcore.

Don’t let the facts get in the way all you dopes in America giving up our freedoms, shredding our Constitution and thinking Islam is the religion of peace.

Skunky on March 23, 2012 at 3:26 pm

Just one in a sequence of aid donations to Egypt. Many billions more have been & will be given in various US and International Monetary Fund “loans”.

Are any Jewish organizations objecting? The administration clearly doesn’t expect any problems from Jewish voters.

Little Al on March 23, 2012 at 4:44 pm

If the nu-democracy in the ME is working out so well for the WH incumbent why are floods of asylum seekers heading to the USA and Europe. Both WH incumbent and Hitlery are beholden to the Saudi monies that have filled their personal coffers, so what’s a favour after all, it’s not their money, it’s the poverty stricken taxpayers trying to earn a crust who should be shouting from the roof tops.

Maybe buffoon Biden can earn his keep by analysing how much money has gone to the ME over the last year and the accountability attached. Are the voters not asking these questions or are their thoughts being diverted by shallow trash, Bird Brain Fluke’s Contraceptive Conundrum, all with a straight face and senatorial backing…..

Another aspect of caring from the religion that’s given us nothing but grief. We give them jobs and this is the gratitude.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2119266/Pensioner-died-fall-care-home-lay-floor-bleeding-10-minutes-Muslim-nurse-praying.html

Eyes Wide Open on March 23, 2012 at 6:17 pm

Panhandle

W/o condoning the Cold War era State Dept, they at least had a rationale – they didn’t want more countries to join the Soviet Bock. But what’s their reason today?

Norman

Problem here is that the Bush Admin bought into Natan Sharansky’s BS about democracy being the guarantor for peace, and as Ali Sina pointed out, it doesn’t factor in islam and even if it may be true in non-Muslim countries, it’s certainly not true when the countries in question are Muslim. I have no idea whether Obama believes that as well, or is coming @ this on his own out of a special affinity for the Muslim Brotherhood. However, point remains that if they’ve supported this move to democracy, as far as consistency goes, they cannot rationalize supporting Mubarak while suddenly witholding aid to the new Islamic regime. As for demands of the new Ikhwan regime in Cairo, they’re not making any demands from the regimes in Baghdad or Islamabad that they treat minorities and women properly, so what’s going on here is hardly a departure.

I’m not saying that I support US aid going to Egypt – far from it. In fact, the US should say that given the way the economy is, it shouldn’t be aiding anybody, and just end all foreign funding and shut down the State Dept (Foreign policy w/ the Pentagon, and Passports w/ ICE/DHS). In good times, I’d use Rush’s criteria – make a list of countries that support the US @ the UN and those that oppose it, and give aid only to the supporters. In bad times such as now, just pull it all.

Infidel on March 24, 2012 at 12:50 am

So do we add this administration to the list of unindicted co defendants in a new Holyland trial for funneling money to a terrorist organization? Oh and why are we negotiating with the Taliban and every other muslim terrorist group in the world? What ever happened to “we do not negotiate with terrorists”?

Ender on March 24, 2012 at 1:29 am

@Ender – Good questions.

CornCoLeo on March 24, 2012 at 7:42 pm

Was that picture taken at Costco? I’m serious. The one I go to here in Austin had several such women “adorned” in their slaves rags today.

CornCoLeo on March 24, 2012 at 7:49 pm

Great article, Debbie!! Pathetic, absolutlely pathetic…..yet further proof that Obummer and his administration is virulently anti-American and also anti-Israel!!!

Dave on March 25, 2012 at 5:49 am

I am very curious about who is going to take all those dumbass muzzys in after the MB start their purges of all things not islamic enough for them, I say fuck them and let the muzzys stew in their own filth when that times comes.

I wonder if the Russians will arm the Copts? That would be a nice thumb in the eye of Obummer administration.

Drakken on March 25, 2012 at 1:43 pm

Why are we giving aid to anyone PEROID!? This country is in dire straights economically, once again hard working people are going to get bent over the barrel on taxes while the welfare slugs get a return for not doing squat, billion dollar corporations like GE pay no effen taxes….WTF!!!!

Nothing like throwing good money (we don’t have) at bad…I’m over this shit!!!

IceNoMore on March 25, 2012 at 2:14 pm

    This is exactly why I am a Ron Paul supporter. RP wants to stop funding other countries (disasters). We are broke. We need to give aid to ourselves! We spend as much to Israel’s enemies as we do to Israel. RP has said this and is correct. A vote for ORomney or OSantorum will just continue the wars. (and our destruction)

    Ago Solvo on March 27, 2012 at 7:30 pm

This takes the cake. Just took a look at the SS New York made with steel from the World Trade Center with a beautiful decal reading “Never Forget” and now I am reading this sh*t.
Is it no surprise Debbie Stabenow is presently taking Medicare slashing marching orders from our “Imam In Chief”? No doubt Egypt will use YOUR money to buy from the same Russian arms dealer Assad buys from. After first buying missles from Iran of course. Why do you think they call it Muslim “brotherhood” dummies.
The next thing you will see Hilary flying diplomacy shuttles in a hijab. and it looks from now on all our future presidents will be hyphenated with our exploding international debt.
Look at it this way, we live in the cradle of the culture of corruption, appeasement through bribary works in Chicago, Detroit and even in Royal Oak so why not in Egypt says the prez. ? The question is when, not if Sheik Obama totally cuts all aid to Israel in some under the table oil deal.

Ron Wolf aka "Columbo" on March 26, 2012 at 12:26 am

I hope to God somebody finds the Lara Logan rape video and it goes viral so people will see how much bullshit it is that we’re sending billions of dollars to those animals. It’s what has to happen to embarrass our government enough and to shock them into reality. It’s what she deserves for cheerleading the Muslim Brotherhood revolution. Every dude on the planet wants to see her tits. Every woman on the planet want to see that home wrecker getting whipped and spanked. It’s a win win for everyone. Where is the video? Why isn’t it all over the internets?

lacey on April 24, 2012 at 11:28 am

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field