January 17, 2012, - 4:31 pm
SCHMUCK: NYTimes Blogger Says Israeli Jews “Having Too Many Kids”
The New York Times has officially embraced the Nazi policy of Judenrein. The “newspaper of record’s” official “Jewish” (in name only) blogger, leftist Shmuel Rosner (f0rmerly a correspondent for Ha’Aretz, the left-wing Israeli newspaper of self-hatred), writes about how upset he is that Jewish Israelis are having more kids, which hinders his apparent dream of the Palestinian Muslims within Israel ultimately outnumbering the Jews via birthrate. He’s upset that the Israeli government encourages couples to have children and calls this unethical and against the “general good.” But it gets worse. This schmuck-and-a-half compares Israel’s recent high fertility rates to the demand by an assassin of an Israeli prime minister to reproduce and other creepy stuff. Yup, all Israeli Jews who wanna have kids are murderers and creepy bizarros, right? In the NYHAMASTimes’ view, that would be a spot on observation.
Israel’s citizens have a great appetite for having children — Israel’s birth rate has been at a record high in recent years — and the state encourages them even more….
In its lavish support, the state often seems to lose sight of the general good or overlooks considerations of costs or ethics (should babies really be raised by aging single mothers?). When the assassin of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin demanded to exercise his “right” to reproduce from his jail cell, the courts agreed. When the parents of a dead son invoked their “right” to extract sperm from his body to create posthumous grand-children, the courts agreed again.
Hey, Shmuel, with Jews like you, who needs anti-Semites? Wow, if this were Auschwitz or Gross Rosen, I know what job Shmuel Rosner would have: uber-kapo. When he talks about “Israelis,” he means Jews. Can you imagine if someone wrote this about Blacks? There was a time when people used these arguments to sterilize Black women in the South. And I’ll bet neither he nor anyone at the Times dares criticize “aging single mothers” having kids in the U.S., where that is actually a problem, as opposed to in Israel, where that isn’t happening much. Oh, and don’t hold your breath for Mr. Rosner to condemn the many Palestinian Muslim women who have 15 kids or more. It’s just the Israeli Jews, who on average have an “unethical” 2.97 kids, that he’s vexed about.
Reader Alex:
The NYT’s sponsored Jewish Blogger decides that Israels are have TOO MANY CHILDREN, thus ruining his Demographic Bomb theories. In his enthusiasm to prevent Jewish demographic resurgence, he even asked whether it is in the children’s interest to be raised by “aging single mothers”. What would the NYT say if a Republican said that? Truly revolting.
Indeed. Sadly, the New York Times can be revolting, anti-Semitic, and bigoted . . . and get away with it.
Henry Ford’s “Dearborn Independent” lives on in Manhattan, with the Jews doing his “international Jew” shtick for him.
Tags: aging single mothers, birth rate, birthrate, demographic bomb, Israel, Israeli birth rate, Israeli birthrate, Jews, New York Times, Shmuel Rosner, too many kids
Among western states, two are experiencing demographic growth: the US and Israel. In the former case, it’s mostly associated with immigration, which continues apace, and the families of immigrants. (Canada may be the third for similar reasons.) “Faith” is still relevant here, and believers have more kids. (In Europe, by contrast, the only faith that counts is Islam.)
But unlike in the US, in Israel even *secular* Jews are reproducing at above-replacement rates. So while the Jewish community in the US is shrinking and aging, that in Israel is vibrant. If genetic mixing is one explanation for so many good looking Israelis, the other is that the demographic balance trends young.
While Israel’s Arabs at one point were reproducing at much higher rates than Israel’s Jews, that’s no longer the case, as Arab rates have gone down while Jewish rates have gone up in recent years. (The Bedouin population continues to grow rapidly, in part because polygamy, nominally illegal, is widely practiced.)
That’s not to say there aren’t socio-economic consequences associated with that growth, as economic participation rates are especially low among Arab women and ultra-Orthodox men, and both communities tended to be poorer than average. But talk of a “demographic threat” as a reason to shrink Israel down to an indefensible size is no longer convincing.
Raymond in DC on January 17, 2012 at 5:21 pm