September 29, 2011, - 5:00 pm
Top ICE Official Indicted for Child Porn; Natl Security Risk or Shaky Case?
Many Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents e-mailed me about the indictment of Miami ICE Special Agent in Charge, Anthony Mangione, Tuesday, on charges of possessing child pornography. As you’ll note, I wrote about this investigation and Mangione’s removal from his position, back in April of this year. At the time I wrote about this, I noted that, if the allegations were true that he possessed child pornography, he is yet another of a litany of high-ranking Department of Homeland Security officials with Top Secret security clearances who are especially susceptible to blackmail by Islamic terrorists. I mentioned former Tampa ICE Special Agent in Charge Frank Figueroa and former Homeland Security Deputy Press Secretary Brian J. Doyle. But I’m a little skeptical about the case against Mr. Mangione.
Read the indictment against Mangione. There are few details, other than that he received a few pornographic images of children in his e-mail. I’d like to know more. If that’s all there is, I wonder about this, just as I wonder about others who are charged with this crime. People send me unsolicited disgusting, pornographic images all of the time. Sometimes they are people who hate me. Other times, the senders are just spammers. I try to delete the ones I’ve opened. But would I be guilty of this same crime–with which Mr. Mangione is being charged–if I received these e-mails and didn’t delete them because I got interrupted and forgot or because I never opened the e-mails (and it turned out someone in the images was under-aged)? It’s very difficult to control who sends you e-mail messages and what they send you. The very brief indictment doesn’t say Mangione solicited the child porn images. And the information provided seems kind of flimsy.
So, I gotta know more before I condemn this man. If it’s true that he is a pervert who actively solicited pornographic images he knew depicted children, then he was a ticking time bomb as a national security risk. But if it’s just that someone sent his AOL account 4-7 images over several months, and he didn’t do anything to receive the images, it’s unfair and not a good use of Department of Justice resources.
There are so many cases like this, and I always wonder when I read about them: is this person a perverse whack job . . . or an innocent victim of internet spam and unsolicited materials?
And I wonder that here. If you know more, please post what you know in the comments section.
How can one possibly control what is sent in an email by another party? You can’t. Why is this even a case?
DS_ROCKS! on September 29, 2011 at 5:36 pm