April 24, 2008, - 3:38 pm
Dirty Harry is Dead
By Debbie Schlussel
No, Clint Eastwood is not dead. He’s still very much alive.
But “Dirty Harry,” the character that made him a big star, is very much dead. Rigor mortis long ago set in, when Eastwood began his years-long repentance tour around Hollywood for having played the conservative, no-nonsense law and order cop.
When Eastwood made the pro-euthanasia, bait-and-switch “Million Dollar Baby,” Dirty Harry went into a coma. When he made the anti-American “Flags of Our Fathers,” Dirty Harry’s heart stopped beating. And with “Letters from Iwo Jima,” which showed American soldiers on the WWII island battlefield as heartless killers, Dirty Harry was dead. When Eastwood told USA Today, he thought there might be some “great stories” from Al-Qaeda’s point of view to tell onscreen, rigor mortis set in to the body of Dirty Harry.
Now, Eastwood has decided to make a sixth Dirty Harry film, “Gran Torino,” to be filmed in Michigan (now that suffering Michigan taxpayers will be subsidizing the film under a stupid new law). But, aside from Eastwood being a gazillion years old, there’s a great reason not to make this film.
With Eastwood’s liberal, anti-war politics–which he’s adopted to do penance to Hollywood for daring to play Dirty Harry in the first place–Dirty Harry is dead. Gone. Forever.
Don’t go ahead. Don’t make my day. I don’t feel lucky.
Dirty Harry is Dead. DO NOT RESUSCITATE.
I realize I’m reaching, but one thing I’ve learned through the years is that many people, especially ‘artists’ have enormous egos. Eastwood may have seen that Sly Stallone successfully made a new Rocky movie. He may figure if there is a Rocky movie about an overage boxer, why can’t he do the same thing?
Especially with our overall society becoming more & more narcissistic, this is what I suspect, although of course I can’t prove it.
c f on April 24, 2008 at 4:03 pm