By Debbie Schlussel
**** UPDATE: PRICELESS VIDEO – HANNITY BUSTED by The Right Perspective– SCROLL DOWN ****
Why is Sean Hannity lying about his close relationship with a Neo-Nazi who openly proclaims his desire to exterminate and eradicate all Blacks and Jews from the planet?
Last year, when conservative bloggers all over the Internet–especially those Hannity regularly plagiarizes (including me, here and here)–and on the airwaves were denouncing Ron Paul for accepting a campaign contribution from a self-avowed Neo-Nazi and White Supremacist, one commentator was notably silent: Sean Hannity, himself.

The Company Sean Hannity Keeps: Neo-Nazi Pal Hal Turner
I wondered why Sean Hannity was so silent on such a newsworthy story he’d normally rip off from the others who broke it. And now we know why: White supremacist–Neo-Nazi, Hal Turner–was a close friend of Hannity’s . . . so close that Hannity gave him his direct, personal phone numbers and invited Turner and his son to visit Hannity on the FOX News Channel set of “Hannity & Colmes,” which they did. This man, Hal Turner, is the same man who called for the murder of Jewish Federal Judge Joan Lefkow. Her husband and mother were assassinated the next day.
From the ADL–a group with whom I normally disagree–here is a brief summary of some of Sean’s friend Hal Turner’s statements and behavior:

* On February 28, 2005, Turner advocated assaulting and killing African-Americans on March 15 to commemorate [Martin Luther King’s] birthday: “I think a full day of violence against blacks . . . would be a really nice thing . . . complete with lynchings, church burnings, drive-by shootings and bombings to put these subhuman animals back in their place.”
* On September 25, Turner suggested to his audience that “it is time to start killing Jews in the United States, cut their throat as they walk down the street, drive by and blast them with a shotgun . . . throw Molotov cocktails through their jewelry store windows and then Israel can ask us to stop.”
* Turner encouraged his audience to “BOMB their synagogues, BOMB their businesses, let’s BOMB their homes, that’s what I SAY because maybe when these filthy Jew, mother f-ckers start dying en masse here in the United States, they will pay attention over in Israel.”
* December 14, 2007: “I am looking for volunteers from the Klan, Aryan Nations, Nazis and Skinheads to join me in Baltimore this weekend for some good old vigilante justice. We will ride the same buses where the attacks took place, looking for the perps. If we find them – or any other upity [sic] negroes [sic] looking for trouble – we will ‘take care of business’ vigilante-style, in the street. See how the negroes [sic] like it when they finally face the original ‘Boyz in the Hood.'”
* November 13, 2007: “I advocate SPITTING ON JEWS when anyone sees them on the street. Let’s all start spitting on jews [sic] immediately. I myself am doing it starting today. In fact, I think we ought to line up outside every local Synagogue every Saturday and spit on the jews [sic] who enter. Then spit on them again as they leave. If this behavior is good enough for jews [sic] in Israel to do to Christians, then it must be good enough for Christians to do to jews [sic]. Let’s get it done.”
* October 2, 2007: “Jews love to complain about the ‘Holocaust.’ Let me tell you, there was no Holocaust in World War 2 — but rest assured, there most certainly IS GOING TO BE a holocaust. I look forward to participating with zeal.”
* January 11, 2006: Following a Moscow synagogue stabbing of nine Jews:, I just want to take a moment to publicly applaud this action. Almighty God himself has commanded us to be at war with Satan and the spawn of Satan, and this man in Russia exercised that obligation today. I’m proud of him! Congratulations on the STABBING of FILTHY JEWS at a synagogue of Satan, Moscow, Russia!”
* May 15, 2005: Instead of fighting Muslims, we Christians should be rounding up jews [sic] and killing them here in America. We should bomb their Synagogues, burn down their Yeshivas and violently attack them on the street and in their places of business. I advocate extreme violence against jews [sic] because their history as a people make them worthy of being killed. Jews are the lowest form of sub-human garbage. They deserve to be killed.”
* His “Hal Turner Radio Network” broadcasts Aryan Nations programs and provides air time to other white supremacist guests such as Matt Hale, leader of the World Church of the Creator. Turner also sponsors other race-baiting programs, among them Michigan white supremacist James Wickstrom’s “Yahweh’s Truth.”

With the stories about the racism and hate of Obama’s Rev. Jeremiah Wright–broken over a year ago by sites like Tom Blumer’s Bizzy Blog and Steve Gilbert’s Sweetness & Light–Hannity quickly jumped on the bandwagon and took credit for breaking the story he actually ripped off from them. But Hannity’s plagiarism is not the point here.
The point here is Hannity’s repeated, phony insistence that he deplores racism and bigotry and would never associate with such racism and bigotry as Obama has. But it’s a big lie–a lie exposed, ironically, by Black racist and supremacist Malik Shabazz on the airwaves of the FOX News Channel’s “Hannity & Colmes”. As usual, Hannity brought on yet another Black extremist demagogue who swept the floor with the proud high school grad with a G.E.D. in Republican talking points regurgitation and website plagiarism.
When Hannity pressed Shabazz about Rev. Wright’s racism and why Obama did not disassociate himself with Wright, Shabazz asked him how this was any different from Hannity’s tight relationship with Hal Turner:

Should you be judged by your past association with Hal Turner, a neo-Nazi?

In response, Hannity lied and claimed that he didn’t know Turner.
But, in fact, Turner was not only a regular caller to Hannity’s WABC radio show, spewing racism on Hannity’s airwaves, the two were close off the air. The Nation–a left-wing source which has been a critic of myself and which, for years, ws the home base of Christopher Hitchens’ columns–exposed Hannity’s attempted cover-up regarding his tight relationship with Mr. Turner. And Mr. Turner, himself, notes that Hannity is lying.
The Nation:

For years, Hannity offered his top-rated radio show as a regular forum for Turner’s occasionally racist, always over-the-top rants. Hannity also chatted with him off-air . . . . Turner has boasted that Hannity once invited Turner and his son on to the set of Fox News’s Hannity and Colmes. . . . Hannity, meanwhile, remains mum about his former alliance with the neo-Nazi, homing in instead on the supposed racism of black and Latino Democrats. . . . When “Hal from North Bergen” began calling his show, Hannity found he could avoid the dangers of direct race-baiting by simply outsourcing it to Turner.
During an August 1998 episode of the show, Turner reminded Hannity that were it not for the graciousness of the white man, “black people would still be swinging on trees in Africa.” . . . Instead of rebuking Turner or cutting him off, Hannity continued to welcome his calls. . . .
Turner and Hannity had bonded off-air. . . . [Turner] wrote in an August 4, 1998, Google discussion forum that Hannity called him to clear the air: “Just last week, Sean phoned me at home from his job at FOX News to continue a conversation we’d begun earlier while he was at WABC,” Turner wrote. “Sean advised that one of you sensitive souls sent him an e-mail about ‘revelations I had made’ here on the internet. He told me it was obviously and [sic] attempt to ‘poison the water.’ ” Turner continued, “I told him that I’ve done things I’m not proud of, and had dark times in my life; and those experiences helped shape the way I live today…the right way. He [Hannity] laughed and commented that he knew the feeling.” Turner added that such chats with Hannity were “not unusual,” often occurring while Hannity held his calls during commercial breaks. . . .
Turner claimed that he and Hannity would talk by phone and even recounted that Hannity had once invited him and his son on to the set of Hannity and Colmes. But Turner and Hannity’s relationship collapsed in 2000 . . . . When WABC’s screeners began blocking Turner’s calls, he realized he was no longer of use to Hannity.

Hal Turner, himself:

About Sean Hannity and Me. . . . .
Yes, we were friends and yes, Sean agreed with some of my views
Recently, Barak Obama has come under serious scrutiny for attending a church whose Reverend Wright espouses anti-American and racist views. One media outlet that has been especially critical of Obama has been the show “Hannity & Colmes” on Fox News Channel.
On Wednesday, March 19, Malik Zulu Shabazz of the New Black Panther Party appeared as a guest on “Hannity & Colmes” to discuss the Obama / Reverend Wright controversy. During that appearance, Sean Hannity asked Shabazz if Barak Obama shouldn’t be judged by his past affiliations with Reverend Wright, to which Shabazz replied by asking Sean Hannity “Should you be judged by your past association with Hal Turner, a neo-Nazi?”
I was quite disappointed when Sean Hannity at first tried to say he didn’t know me and then went on to say that I ran some senate campaign in New Jersey. In fact, Sean Hannity does know me and we were quite friendly a number of years ago.
When Hannity took over Bob Grant’s spot on 77 WABC in New York City, I was a well-known, regular and welcome caller to his show. Through those calls, Sean and I got to know each other a bit and at some point, I can’t remember exactly when, Sean gave me the secret “Guest call-in number” at WABC so that my calls could always get on the air.
When I utlized [sic] that call-in number, Sean would very often come onto that line during commercial breaks so we could chat before I went on the air. Our off-the-air chats grew to an exchange of other phone numbers, me giving Sean my home and cellular number and Sean giving me his direct dial-in number at Fox News channel.
In 1993, My wife got pregnant and around a month later, Sean reported that he and his wife were expecting their first child. We got to talking about things expectant dads talk about and the relationship grew.
My wife gave birth to our son in June 1994, Seans wife gave birth to their child about a month later.
Over the course of the next three or four years, Sean and I spoke regularly off the air about our kids, politics and news of the day. My on-air calls to his show remained regular and welcome.
Around 1997, Sean invited me and my then-three-year-old-son, to come to Fox News Channel to be in the studio (NOT ON THE AIR) during a live broadcast of “Hannity & Colmes”. I accepted the invitation and my son and I went. We were inside the studio standing between the camera men as the show aired live. We got to speak with both Sean Hannity and Allan Colmes before the show. Like most three year olds, my son’s willingness to stay quiet didn’t last, so I thought it best to take him home rather than have his noise air during their show.
Sean and I spoke by phone the next day. I thanked him for the chance to be there and he said it was a real pleasure meeting me and my son.
In the year 2000, I sought the Republican nomination to the US House of Representatives from the 13th Congressional District of New Jersey. Since I was a candidate for federal office and since WABC served the area in which I was running for election, WABC was FORCED by federal law to accept my campaign radio ads, many of which were quite explicit. The station did not want to air the ads but the law left them no choice.
At about the same time, WABC changed program directors from John Mainelli to Phil Boyce. It seems to me that Mr. Boyce objected vehemently to my campaign commercials and political beliefs and I suspect he told Sean Hannity that I was not to be welcomed on WABC anymore. Since Boyce had the power to fire Hannity, it appears to me that Hannity did what he was told. From that point on, Sean Hannity never spoke to me again. Not on the air or off.
Here we are, more than eight years later, my friendship with Sean has become some sort of hot issue. . . .
I can tell you from my firsthand, personal experience that Sean Hannity does, in fact, agree with many of my political and social views. . . .Suffice it to say that my recollection is that when Sean and I spoke by phone, while no one else was listening, he and I exchanged the kinds of views that most White, Irish-Catholic guys hold, but won’t speak in public.
In my opinion, based on my first hand experience, I believe Sean Hannity is, in fact, a Hal Turner sort of guy. It seems to me that a big difference between Sean and me is that I am willing to say publicly what I think about savage Black criminals, diseased, uneducated illegal aliens and the grotesque cultural destruction wrought by satanic jews while Sean and many others keep quiet to protect their paychecks.

Now, Turner says he has tapes of his phone conversations with Hannity, which he is offering up for $100,000. Since Hannity is now a multi-millionaire and would certainly not benefit from his REAL views being outed, how much you wanna bet that Hannity beats the liberals to the punch for the chance at paying Turner the $250K he wants for the tapes?:

OFFER TO LIBERALS REGARDING SEAN HANNITY
I HAVE TAPE RECORDINGS OF MY CALLS WITH HIM – BOTH ON AND OFF THE AIR. . . . .
Since more than 100,000 of you read the story on Huffington Post about me being friendly with Hannity years ago, I made an offer on my radio show tonight:
I will release to the public, all the tape recordings I have between me and Sean Hannity both on and off the air IF, by April 15, 2008, those 100,000 readers of Huffington Post send me one dollar (or more) each until such time as I receive One-Hundred-Thousand Dollars ($100,000.) AND the deadline for the money arriving is April 15. If I receive the $100K by April 15, I will release via tape, CD and download from this site, all the “dicey” conversations we had. If I do not receive at least $100,000, by April 15, I will not release the tapes.
I will not speculate or make any representations about what is on those tapes, but suffice it to say I think there is material on them that you will find VERY useful!
In addition to the offer above, I am willing to SELL the tapes, complete ownership of their content and all broadcast rights forever to anyone willing to buy them for two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000).
If there is a conflit between the $100,000 coming and and the $250,000, I agree to REFUND the $100K less postage to whoever donates.
I am willing top post a LIST OF ALL DONATIONS citing only the amount, form of payment and postmark so all of you can see each day how much comes in. Complete transparency!
That’s the offer. Those of you who hate Sean Hannity have a chance to pony-up. Those of you who want to conceal these tapes forever also have a chance to buy them.
WIth regard to the legality of the tapes, I live in New Jersey and under our law, it is LEGAL to record telephone conversations if one party to the call allows it. Since I was one party to each call, I authorized it and so the tapes are legal.

Tapes or no tapes, I think it’s pretty clear that Sean Hannity had a relationship with a Neo-Nazi bent on destroying Jews, Blacks, Hispanics and others. Hannity didn’t have a problem with it then, had to be ordered to end it by a man who signed his paycheck, and is now lying about it–desperately attempting to cover it up. That tells us everything we need to know.
But I agree with Hannity in one aspect on this situation: The company you keep says a lot about you.
And Sean Hannity kept company with a self-avowed White Supremacist who would send my family back to the gas chambers of Auschwitz and Bergen Belsen.
Hey Sean, you look great in Brown. Sig Heil.
*** Thanks to Reader Marlene for the tip on this very disturbing and illuminating story.
One other thing: Now, I know why Sean finds it’s okay to rip off my stuff. Jews can’t really own property–intellectual or otherwise–per Third Reich rules. So, what’s his excuse for all the gentiles he steals from?
**** UPDATE #2: More Great Video Analysis of Sean Vannity vs. Malik Shabazz on Hal Turner: