January 26, 2007, - 11:46 am
The Real Reason Obama is Hiding Muslim Background
By Debbie Schlussel
Why is Barack Hussein Obama running, hiding, concealing, and denying when it comes to his Muslim background?
Various polls on Presidential elections indicate that he’d lose more than half the American people off the bat. Why can’t he openly admit his background–that he was a Muslim at one time in his life, even though he claims to be a Christian now?
Various polls show us the answer.
Gallup, Pew, the Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg and FOX News frequently do polls on the one thing–the one bugaboo–that would keep the average American from voting for a Presidential candidate, even if the candidate was ideal in every other category.
Americans are not stupid. They see the way Muslims around the world–and in America, too–act in the name of their religion. And more than half of them won’t vote for a Muslim for President.
In June, a nationwide LA Times/Bloomberg poll showed these results:
Would Not Vote for a Presidential Candidate who is
Mormon–37%
Jew–15%
Evangelical Christian-21%
Muslim–54%
Catholic–10%
A December FOX News Poll shows these results:
Less likely to vote for a presidential candidate if the candidate is:
A Protestant–6%
Roman Catholic–10%
Jewish–10%
A Member of the Christian Coalition–24%
A Mormon–32%
A Muslim–45%
An Athiest–50%
A Scientologist–53%
In 2004, a Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life survey found that 38% of Americans would not vote for a Muslim for President.
Here are the numbers from Gallup in 1999:
Percentage of Americans who won’t vote for a Presidential candidate who is . . .
Catholic: 4% (1937: 30%)
Black: 5% (1958: 63%, 1987: 21%)
Jewish: 6% (1937: 47%)
Baptist: 6%
Woman: 8%
Mormon: 17%
Muslim: 38%
Gay: 37% (1978: 74%)
Atheist: 48%
The proof is in the numbers. A Muslim candidate cannot become President at this point in time. And Barack Hussein Obama does not want Americans to know that, at the very least, at one point in his life, he was a Muslim. And is still very sypathetic to their viewpoint.
Tags: America, Barack Hussein Obama, Bloomberg, Christian Coalition, Debbie Schlussel Why, LA Times, Los Angeles Times, President, presidential candidate, the Los Angeles Times
Well, that finishes it. Abnormal Blitzed’s candidate will go nowhere fast especially with Clinton in the picture.
BTW, isn’t it funny that LIBERALS all of a sudden have problems with fellow black LIBERALS when they’re in competition with each other? For half a century, LIBERALS have been brow-beating everyone by preaching tolerance; assigning guilt; establishing set-asides and affirmative action programs for blacks; but once Osama Obama poses a threat to a white LIBERAL, Queen Rodham, the gloves come off and she digs up the dirt on this guy with glee and not a peep from the usual suspects. Can you imagine if a conservative were to delve into Osama Obama’s background? – There would be bloody hell to pay! The same LIBERALS would declare; “How DARE you attack a black man!” Do any of you remember the shit Bush’s father got about the Willie Horton ad?
As for Abnormal Blitzed (the pro-muzlum propagandist on this blog)…He’s either;
A. A muzlum parading around in a Jew’s name,
B. A typical, self-hating, Jewish LIBERAL who hates America.
He’s DEFINITELY one or the other.
Why Debbie spends any time refuting your lies and bullshit is beyond me. Everyone on this blog knows who you are and we pay no attention to the sewage that spews from your computer. You can link CNN, PBS, and al-Jazeera all you like but we all know that those “news” outlets are pro-muzlum and biased, just as you are. So my advice to you is; Keep posting so we all get a good laugh, while at the same time, keep reminding us of who America’s enemies really are.
As they say; Even cow manure serves a purpose.
Thee_Bruno on January 26, 2007 at 12:52 pm