January 12, 2007, - 11:14 am

Frightening: Life Imitates Art in Case of Mob-Aiding Fed

By Debbie Schlussel
We often hear about cases where cops, both local and federal, have helped the Mob. Two New York Police detectives were recently found guilty in helping murder Mob informants. And FBI agents in Boston helped the Mob, resulting in murder of innocent people.
But we see it most on TV and in the movies, in fictional works about the Mafia–“Cosa Nostra”–in America.
Now, there’s yet another real-life case. But it sounds like it’s right out of a movie.
In the news today, Deputy U.S. Marshal John Thomas Ambrose, in Chicago, was placed on administrative leave in September, when he came under suspicion for leaking to the Mob the whereabouts of a key Mob informant who is assigned to the U.S. Marshals Service Witness Security Program. Ambrose was arrested yesterday.

johnthomasambrose.jpg

John Thomas Ambrose: U.S. Marshal & Reverse Mob Snitch

More from The Chicago Tribune:

A deputy U.S. marshal was taken into custody yesterday for allegedly leaking “highly sensitive, confidential information” to organized crime figures about a key witness in the FBI’s investigation of more than a dozen unsolved Chicago mob killings.
John Thomas Ambrose, 38, was charged in a criminal complaint with revealing information related to “the status, substance of cooperation and travel” of Nicholas Calabrese, a defendant and key witness in the FBI’s Operation Family Secrets investigation, according to a news release from the U.S. attorney’s office. Ambrose made the alleged leak while Calabrese was in the federal witness protection program, the release said. . . .
The information allegedly leaked by Ambrose includes how much Calabrese was cooperating and his travel.
While Ambrose allegedly revealed closely guarded and highly sensitive information, there was no indication that Calabrese or any other witness “was ever in danger,” said Gary Shapiro, first assistant U.S. attorney. Nor is there any evidence that “any attempt was made to harm” him or anyone else, he added.

Ri-i-i-i-ight. Thomas was just providing the info to the Mob for his health, and they were just soliciting it for theirs. Never wanted to do the guy. Mmm-hmm.

According to the FBI’s complaint affidavit, Calabrese has admitted being a “made” member of the Chicago mob and has provided federal law-enforcement officials with “the most expansive overview ever of Chicago Outfit murders.”
In 2002, he agreed to cooperate with the FBI investigation into mob members, including his brother Frank Calabrese Sr. and brothers James and Michael Marcello, the U.S. attorney’s office said. The investigation ultimately produced indictments in April 2005 against 14 defendants, alleging a 40-year racketeering conspiracy involving 18 previously unsolved mob slayings, often of suspected government cooperators and witnesses.
Nicholas Calabrese entered the federal witness protection program in August 2002 and was placed in a federal prison.
According to the news release, Ambrose was a supervisory inspector for the marshal service’s Great Lakes Regional Fugitive Task Force. On two occasions when Calabrese was brought to Chicago, Ambrose served on the night shift security detail assigned to protect him, the news release said.
In 2003, the government intercepted 11 prison conversations between the Marcellos that indicated that Michael Marcello had an inside source of information concerning Calabrese, the release stated. In one conversation, Ambrose was identified, “not by name, but by a description that could fit no other law-enforcement officer.”
Michael Marcello told his brother that his source, whom he referred to as “the baby sitter,” was the son of a deceased defendant prosecuted in the “Marquette 10” police corruption case in the early 1980s. Ambrose’s father, Thomas, died in prison after being convicted of bribery in that investigation.
Also, Ambrose’s fingerprints were found on key witness-protection documents related to Calabrese that were kept in a locked cabinet, the release said.
If convicted, Ambrose could be sentenced to 10 years in prison and fined $250,000.

In this case, it’s a Mob figure who’s being outed, but it could just as well be an innocent person who provided information about Islamic terrorists. And don’t kid yourself–from what I’ve heard from insiders, that’s already happening.
It’s frightening because it’s yet another example to would-be informants that their identities, their whereabouts, and their safety are not truly secure. And it discourages them from cooperating with federal authorities. Why should they do so, and risk death?
Sometimes, it’s an offer you can refuse. They caught this guy, but they won’t catch everyone. It doesn’t give comfort to those who want to help our crime-fighting and counterterrorism efforts. But also want to remain alive.




Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


2 Responses

What was your intention here? Are you trying to frighten people from coming forward with information on terrorists or are you trying to intimate that the FBI is full of traitors? Seems to me that you should be applauding the FBI for arresting one of their own. At least they didn’t promote him!!
MY INTENTION WAS TO LET PEOPLE KNOW THAT THEY AREN’T ALWAYS SAFE IF THEY TRUST THEIR SECURITY TO THE GOVERNMENT. AND THIS CASE SHOWS IT. I REPRESENTED AN INFORMANT ON TERRORISM WHO HELPED THE FBI. THE FEDS OUTED HIM AND HIS NAME TO BOTH DETROIT PAPERS AND HE HAD TO FLEE. HIS LIFE WAS IN DANGER, AND HE AND HIS FAMILY WERE SHOT AT REPEATEDLY BY HEZBOLLAH TERRORISTS. YOU CANNOT ALWAYS TRUST THE GOVERNMENT. THEY’VE SCREWED A *LOT* OF THEIR TERRORISM INFORMANTS. BIG-TIME. AND THE REASON IS THAT THEY SIMPLY AREN’T SERIOUS ENOUGH IN THE WAR ON TERROR, TOO PC TO MUSLIMS, AND ALL-AROUND–IN ALL CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS–LARGELY INCOMPETENT. THE MANY THINGS I’VE WRITTEN ABOUT BUSH POLICY ON THESE VERY ISSUES SHOULD POUND THIS INTO EVERYONE’S HEAD.
AND FYI, THIS GUY WAS A U.S. MARSHAL, NOT AN FBI AGENT.
DEBBIE SCHLUSSEL

LoveAManInAUniform on January 12, 2007 at 3:59 pm

No wonder people don’t want to get involved. Were you able to do anything for the informant you represented? (Just in case I ever find myself in the same situation)

LoveAManInAUniform on January 12, 2007 at 6:34 pm

Leave a Reply

* denotes required field