October 9, 2006, - 11:43 am
“Provocative Act”?!: No, It’s an Act of WAR
By
Well, I’m sure relieved to note that the Bush Administration has their script straight. This morning, White House Spokesman Tony Snow and President Bush both called North Korea’s testing, last night, of Taepodong-2 Missiles, “a provocative act.”
But, as we’ve noted, Condoleeza Rice back in June when they tested missiles then. And where did it get her? Nowhere. As we noted then, calling it a “provocative act,” is a bit of an understatement.
What one sees in a porno flick is “a provocative act.” Testing missiles that can easily reach our shores is an ACT OF WAR.
Time to treat it accordingly, instead of using euphemisms best reserved for XXX movies, not missiles with deadly consequences.
This is not “Fatal Attraction.” It’s just fatal.
Staying on message doesn’t help if the message is a weak and empty one. Referring it to the useless U.N. is a cop-out–as it has been on Iraq, Iran, Sudan, etc., etc., ad nauseam.
Tags: Bush, Bush administration, Debbie Schlussel Well, Iraq, Islamic Republic of Iran, North Korea, President, spokesman, Sudan, Tony Snow, United Nations, White House
Debbie…I’m questioning the entire concept of “civilian control of the military”. We develop hundreds of billions in high tech weapons technology and then lack the will to use it when needed by placing mental dwarfs, feminists and eunichs in control. No better current example than Condaleeza Rice’s track record of failed attempts at foreign policy.
A second excellant example…some may be old enough to recall…Bill Clinton’s VERY FIRST act as president was an attempt to open the floodgates of military service to homosexuals. Yes…”queer” the military and turn it into yet another privileged sanctuary for the depraved elements of society.
Civilian control is clearly a very serious problem.
joesixpack31 on October 9, 2006 at 12:56 pm