March 31, 2010, - 4:10 pm
Girlie-Man Nation: Western Women Don’t Want Masculinity & Why (Decade of the Palin)
I’ve written about this many times over the last decade: the feminization of America’s men and the butchification of America’s women. We’ve done plenty of “Men-the New Women” alerts on this site.
Western Women Chose the More Effeminate of These Girlie-Men
In World War II, when droves of women went to work in factories as Rosie the Riveter while their men were abroad fighting Nazis, they knew it was only temporary. When the REAL men came back, the women would return to being women. It’s hardly news that now America’s men are the new women. And vice versa. Like I said, we’ve been noting that here for over a decade.
Saturday’s Wall Street Journal had a much publicized two-page feature, “Why Women Don’t Want Macho Men,” about studies consistently showing that women in relatively wealthy Western societies prefer men with feminine faces and features, while women in struggling societies prefer masculine men. But the article should have been title, “Why Spoiled Western Women Don’t Want Men & Why They’d Rather Be Them.”
Count me out of that mix. I looked at the photos of the feminine men and thought, “Blechhhh.” As a red-blooded, American female, I prefer the ruggedly handsome, masculine-looking guy–who can fix things and protect me–any day of the week to the effeminate, gay-looking girlie-men these “sophisticated Western women” picked. Sadly, according to these studies, many Western women prefer the feminized version. But, to me, even the “masculine” version looks like a chick (see above). Yuck.
The Journal doesn’t directly express the societal distinction here–that the women who prefer feminine men are Western and afflicted with feminism and female gender-based affirmative action–and, instead, calls them countries with “healthier” populations. It ain’t got nothin’ to do with health. Sorry, but men who spend a lot of time on their hair and have a basket of hair products aren’t men. They’re girls stuck in men’s bodies. That’s not healthy.
In fact, preferring effeminate men is, on the contrary, very unhealthy. It’s a serious problem. And it will result in the further decline of the West. The society that is strongest and growing–Islam–embraces masculinity. The societies that always die are matriarchies. Name one martriarchy that’s survived and become a great, long-lasting civilization. You can’t. There aren’t any. There was no Ceasar-ette. No Alexandra the Great. No General Pat-Tina. Helen of Troy may have inspired mythical wars, but she didn’t lead them. She was merely the lure for the male warriors, the booty . . . and the booty. And there was no exfoliant or eye creams on their night stands, nor is there any–I’ll bet–in Mr. Bin Laden’s cave. Neither of these parties, respectively, had or have the luxury of engaging in this kind of be-like-women, sensitive man stupidity.
The European women who were part of these studies (along with Americans) have already lost their countries and their continents. Marriage is over in their societies. They are single motherhood nations (which we are fast becoming, a la Bristol Palin syndrome). The only masculine men in their societies are named Mohammed and are fast taking over. Preferring girlie-men is a fast track to the death of a society, the death of civilization. L’Oreal Moisturizer for Men won’t save the world when a homicide bomber is about to press the detonator.
But who’s surprised by this? Not me. After decades of Oprah daily telling America’s women that men suck; after decades of Hollywood telling America that most men and fathers are mere sperm donors who are chumps, absentee, and deadbeats; with female writing staffs on hit shows, like “Mad Men,” revising history and lying to us about men even back when they actually were men; with the fashion forces that be putting men into women’s clothes, like “skinny jeans,” “pink” . . . er, MAN-genta, and male corsets; with the rapid death of male habits like hunting being replaced with unisex hobbies like gaming from home and remaining on the couch; after hardware stores like Home Depot and Lowe’s selling pink toolkits and urging women to do the repairs they once relied on men to do; with female football coaches for high school boys raised by single mothers; with even the so-called “traditional family values conservatives” embracing alpha male breadwinner husbands like Sarah Palin and Michelle Fraudkin (with their effeminate, estrogen-doused Mr. Mom wives-with-a-penis trailing behind like “cute” accessories, their detached testicles tightly in a jar somewhere in the distance), just like the “conservatives” in Europe–even less feminine than the butchy Michelle Obama, because at least her emasculated hubby who takes her orders and ire is the PINO (President In Name Only); with “conservative hero” Palin and her daughter Bristol telling their anti-male hero Oprah (as they recently did) that the illegitimate, out-of-wedlock man and single mother doesn’t need a man in her life–are we really surprised that this dangerous influence of keeping men down, male-bashing, and slowly “phasing men out” has taken hold in a way that renders the male gender irrelevant?
I’d say that it seems the only “man” some of these women want is Obama. Instead of relying on their husbands to pay for their healthcare, they relied on Obama and mostly male Democrats who voted for ObamaCare, to give it to them. So, they don’t need a man. But on the other side of the ideological divide, conservatives are embracing feminism in the Palins, etc., too. Even the conservative “males” are feminine–Sean Hannity and National Review Editor Rich Lowry, who gives the effeminate males, pictured above, a run for their girlie-man money. The words “macho,” “masculine,” and “masculinity” are oil to their water. And I’ll bet you’ll use a lot of fingers counting the hair products and skin creams in their bathrooms.
Our society–from all angles–has bowed to the wiles of dead curmudgeon, Betty Friedan, and live one, Gloria Steinem. Whether it’s Hollywood’s output, embrace of Mr. Moms and girlie-men even on the right, and the hardware stores’ pink tools, we’ve lost the appreciation for all that is male.
They’ve done these things, and we’ve followed suit, eating up their feminist baloney every step of the way.
And we’re supposed to be surprised that Western women choose girlie male faces and characteristics in men?
It’s not news. But it’s definitely a bad thing.
And it’s the burly, stubbly-faced male that’s gonna be able to drag you from a burning building. Not the guy who looks like Leonardo DiCaprio, Ryan Secrest, or Ricky Martin.
A matriarchy isn’t the only society that doesn’t survive. A Girlie-Man Nation doesn’t, either.
Tags: butchification, decline of America, effeminate, females, feminization, girlie men, girlie-man, girlie-man nation, Jena Pincott, Males, masculinity, Wall Street Journal, Why Women Don't Want Macho Men
Hey, problems with girlie men? Come to Rome and try some so characteristic “Coatto”, the flavour of old fashioned mediterranean male. By the way u r completely rigth my dear, but it will be the peak oil to save us to this feminized catastrophe
Marcello on July 13, 2010 at 12:58 am