January 11, 2008, - 12:41 pm

The “Ethical” Barry Hussein Obama & His Arab Skid-Greasers

By Debbie Schlussel
If you’re like most sane Americans, you don’t get your news from “Good Morning America,” where producer Mabel Chan doesn’t know what “the Mob” is and where they see “Islamophobia” around every corner.
But, if you watched it this morning, you saw this nice little report (watch video here) by ABC News investigative reporter Brian Ross about the long-talked about illicit relationship between Arab-American indictee Antoine “Tony” Rezko and Barack Hussein Obama. The “ethical” Senator, who accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars from Rezko and engaged in a sneaky multi-million dollar deal for his home with Rezko’s wife, is now lying about it, according to ABC and other news reports. Rezko is under federal indictment along with his friend Ali Ata, a member of the “Religion of Peace.”

barackobama.jpg

Not in the report, but known to me and many others, even though Barry Hussein Obama protests loudly that he has always been against the Iraq war, he tried to finagle a deal for skid-greaser Rezko to build nuclear power plants in the new Iraq.
Yet, with all of this, Obama has made his Senate career about “ethics” and says there will be no lobbyists in his White House. Mmm-hmmm.
It all has echoes of the Clintons and how they said theirs would be the “most ethical” administration in White House history.
Why is it that those who proclaim to be the “most” ethical are always the least?

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

January 11, 2008, - 12:09 pm

Happy Anniversary, Gitmo Detainees

By Debbie Schlussel
Today is the sixth anniversary of the first transfer of detainees to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
And that’s cause for celebration, not protest–the way Amnesty International is marking the auspicious occasion.
What isn’t cause for celebration are these facts, which are reality because of the ACLU, Amnesty International, and other whiners for whom this is still not good enough:
* Islamic terrorists at Gitmo are better fed than most Americans–with gourmet meals three times a day.
* They have the best medical care in the world.

gitmoterrorist.jpg

gitmomeal.jpg

Gitmo Halal Meals: Buffets Fit For a Sultan

* They have the best lawyers money–and the Saudis and Gulf states and the ACLU–can buy.
* They have the best workout facilities with state-of-the-art gym equipment.
* Their library has about as much Harry Potter material as my local public library, perhaps more.
* And they are freer to practice Islam in this “prison” than in any other place in the world.
* The detainees at Gitmo–unlike in the rest of the Islamic world–need not worry about the Shi’ite v. Sunni divide. It’s just them against the evil infidels and “Zionists.”
Yes, despite all of these things, Amnesty International is holding worldwide whining sessions, when AI doesn’t even treat its own employees as well as America treats terrorists who plot to kill them.
The only thing we should be protesting, today, are these things:
* that this class of hardened killers is treated better than all others in America, complete with La-Z-Boy chairs.
* that they are being released to kill again, all over the world.
* that President Bush has never had the cojones to stand up for the reality amidst the fiction we are told about Gitmo and even he has repeatedly joined calls for its closing (sounds like “I voted for it before I voted against it.”)
* that so many politicians have called for the closing of this prison in which murderers of Americans and chauffeurs of Bin Laden are treated better than many Americans who’ve never ever committed a crime.
amnestyprotestsgitmo.jpg

Nice Raincoat: Travesty International Protests Club Gitmo

Happy Anniversary, Gitmo Detainees. You aren’t rotting at Gitmo. But I pray that you Rot In Hell.
Gitmosis . . . Catch it.

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

January 10, 2008, - 4:50 pm

Yet Another Movie Where the Muslims Aren’t the “Real” Terrorists?

By Debbie Schlussel
The most disingenuous movies are the ones where they trick you into thinking the Muslims/Arabs are the terrorists, and in the end, they’re the nice people, wrongly accused victims. Someone else “did it.”
I wonder if “Vantage Point” will be like that. From the trailer, posted below, it appears to be the case.
It’s one of the big spring 2008 movies that is getting a lot of promotion. As a movie critic, I go to a lot of screenings. Almost none come with previews. But, for some reason, we’ve gotten at least two previews for “Vantage Point.” That reason is that Sony Pictures is spending a lot to promote this movie, including a lot of banner ads atop the movie bible site, IMDB.


The movie stars the hot (from afar–I’ve met him as my friend Tom plays drums in his band, and I found him to be scrawny and manorexic) Dennis Quaid and Matthew Fox as Secret Service Agents, protecting the President (William Hurt) during an assassination attempt in Spain. The President is there for a “landmark summit in the global war on terror.” No-one knows who did it, but there is film and eyewitness accounts from several different vantage points. The tagline for the movie is:

8 Strangers. 8 Points of View. 1 Truth.

You know what that usually means in this kind of film. People think the Muslim guy did it, but the “1 Truth” is otherwise. This trick has been played so many times since 9/11–as in “Flight Plan”–it’s nauseating.
The movie also stars Muslim Arab actor Said Taghmaoui as an alleged terrorist (who probably ends up being a “nice guy”). Taghmaoui also played Islamic terrorists in “Sleeper Cell” and other movies and a Palestinian in the awful, propagandistic “O Jerusalem.” So, you know where this movie is probaly going.

vantagepoint.jpg

Oh, and the movie also stars has-been and queen of the pretentious Susan, er . . . “Sigourney” Weaver, who claimed American men have a “bizarre kinship” with Islamic extremists. Yep, sounds like this movie is her kinda flick.
So, judging from the trailer, what do you think? The movie comes out in late February, and I plan on reviewing it for you.
But I think my hunch on this one is correct.
Just remember: Who was behind the major terrorist attacks in Spain, recently? Not ETA, but Al-Qaeda.
Hollywood can keep purveying this “many points of view, 1 truth” BS, but we know what the real “1 truth” is.

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

January 10, 2008, - 1:29 pm

Mitt Happens: Prominent Michigan Illegal Alien Supporter Endorses Romney

By Debbie Schlussel
I warned you not to trust Mitt Romney’s flip-flop-flipping. Take his position on illegal aliens. He now claims he’s for tough enforcement of immigration laws and impenetrable borders, though he was previously lax on this as Guv of Taxachusetts.
But, yesterday, Romney proudly accepted the endorsement of Domino’s Pizza Founder and Opus Dei member Tom Monaghan, something he’d been apparently lobbying for for some time.
But here’s what you need to know about Tom Monaghan:
* Monaghan gave money so that the law school he founded, Ave Maria, could start a special clinic giving illegal aliens free legal help, so they can further clog immigration courts and stop their deportations.

tommonaghan.jpgdominospizza.jpgmittromney.jpg

illegalaliens.jpg

Mitt Happens: Illegal Alien Advocate Tom Monaghan Endorses Romney

From my July 2006 post about this:

The Asylum and Immigrant Rights Law Clinic at Ave Maria School of Law has named Bridgette Carr director. Carr, an assistant clinical professor of law, will now oversee the clinic, established in 2004 to provide pro bono services to immigrants in search of asylum and legal services.

* As a big Bush donor, Tom Monaghan backed his fellow Opus Dei member and buddy, the pro-Hezbollah porn addict and racist Stephen Murphy III, for U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan. He even enlisted Ave Maria Law School’s Dean, Bernard Dobranski, who sat on Bush’s selection committee, to spread dirt on Murphy’s competitors for the job.
And that’s why Murphy got the job . . . and proceeded to allow several Hezbollah financiers and money launderers, including Talal Chahine (who gave $20 million to Hezbollah), to leave the country. He was soft on those who didn’t manage to escape and allowed Roy Bailey–a top immigration official who accepted bribes in exchange for allowing Hezbollah operatives to stay here–to remain on the job with pay for FOUR YEARS after he knew of the shenanigans.
* Oh, and then there’s Monaghan’s previous candidate for President, Sam Brownback–the guy who opposed the surge in Iraq, supported cutting-and-running, and supported the pro-Syrian Baker Commission/Iraq Study Group Report.
These are Tom Monaghan’s people and activities.
This is Mitt Romney’s new big-time ally in Michigan. You know what they say about “the company you keep.”

Mitt Happens. . .

mitthappens.jpg

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

January 10, 2008, - 12:35 pm

Help Me Read the Morning Papers, Understand Bush’s Mixed Messages

By Debbie Schlussel
I need your help. You see, I’m confused after having read this morning’s newspapers. I can’t really figure out what happened in the Middle East during Bush’s trip to Israel, yesterday. Maybe you can help me figure it out.
First I read the Wall Street Journal, where the headline is this:

Bush Gives Israel Scope for Antiterror Acts

And the article says this:

President Bush signaled he would give Israel broad leeway to continue raids targeting Palestinian militants and to develop settlements in disputed parts of Jerusalem, despite international pressure to curb such actions.

bushhamastine.jpg

accomplicestoterror.jpg

Thanks to Esser Agaroth for the Photos of These Posters

But then I read an article from Associated Press, which appeared in today’s Detroit Free Press, with this headline:

Bush’s Orders: No Settlements, Terrorist Havens

It features this text:

President Bush, in the Mideast to push along a peace deal by the end of his presidency, gave orders to both sides on Wednesday. He told Israelis that “illegal” outposts in disputed land must go. . . .
Of unauthorized Jewish outposts in the West Bank, Bush said simply: “The agreement was get rid of outposts — illegal outposts. And they ought to go.”

Well, first of all, the adjective “unauthorized” is incorrect. The land is owned by Jews, and they have every right to build on it.
But the two stories–or, at least, their headlines–are contradictory. So, which do you think is Bush’s true position? The story the Free Press claims says “No Settlements” is actually not Bush’s order. He differentiates between “settlements” (neighborhoods of Jerusalem) and “outposts” (suburbs nearby in the rest of the so-called “West Bank.” It’s a silly distinction, which basically says, Jews can live in suburbs bordering Detroit, but not in the outlying suburbs. There, no Jews or dogs allowed.
So, it’s quite clear to me, from everything Bush and Condi Clueless have been saying over the last year or so, that the latter story reflects the Bush apartheid position.
And then there’s this from today:

Bush also called for the end of the “occupation” of Arab land by the IDF [Israel Defense Forces].

Bush also called for the end of the “occupation of Mexican land by California, Texas, Arizona, etc. Well, no, he didn’t do that because that wouldn’t get him a Nobel and some sort of legacy for his failed Presidency. It would be his epitaph, as this should be.
Oh, and by the way, check out this welcome Bush got from HAMAS. Does it look to you like Israel will ever get peace from them by ceding them more land? . . .

bushhamas.jpg

Compare that to the way the kids treat him in Israel. . . .
bushisrael.jpg

Which group of these people would you reward . . . and which would you punish? Too bad dopey Bush is doing the opposite.
Yup, sadly, the posters above–which some Israelis used in protests prior to Bush’s visit–are accurate, indeed.

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

January 10, 2008, - 1:09 am

Coinky-dink?: National Human Vacuum Cleaner Reappears at “Auspicious” Time

By Debbie Schlussel
Not sure if Barack Hussein Obama is paying her to suddenly be back in the news, but I’m one of those who believes that B. Hussein is as scary–and as sneaky–as Hillary Rodham Cankles. He just has a more GQ veneer to hide the wickedness, which makes him perhaps even more scary than the visible Wicked Witch of the West.
Anyway, TMZ reports that Monica Lewinsky is suddenly appearing all over the place. Hmmm . . . I wonder why. Timing is everything, and this is a timely reminder to America’s primary voters about what happened the last time a certain gruesome twosome occupied the White House. As the French would say, Quelle Coincidence – Whatta Coincidence.
So, here’s the latest photo. One prob: It would make more of a statement if the dress were blue. But, hey, Louis Vuitton gets an interesting product placement (check out the luggage) . . .

monicalewinsky2008.jpg

Devil With a Blue Dress, Blue Dress, Blue Dress

TMZ asks:

If Hillary becomes president, will Monica get her old job back?

Well, I heard the White House already has new vacuum cleaners. On the other hand, it reminds me that the campaign theme song for Bill Clinton appearances on the Cankles campaign trail should definitely be this ditty from the late Sylvester James . . .

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

January 10, 2008, - 12:05 am

Barack HUSSEIN Obama Hate-Mail of the Day

By Debbie Schlussel
SHHHHHHHHHHHH! Don’t you know that you can’t mention the name Barack Hussein Obama and the I-word, ISLAM, in the same sentence? You should know better than To. Do. This.
Gee, with such eloquent verbalizers on his side, he’s sure to win the White House . . . and fulfill the prophesy of “Idiocracy” about who will occupy Da Oh-val Awfizz:

barackobama.jpgislamiccrescent.jpg

From: good man ihateextremist@yahoo.com
Date: Jan 9, 2008 9:33 AM
Subject: you are a piece of shit
To: writedebbie@gmail.com
your article on Barack being a muslim is a load of shit.. shut your dirty and smell mouth off, PLEASE..
SHUT UP or HELLLLLLL fanatic idiot…

Grammar, spelling, and words with more than four letters and one syllable sold separately.
Seriously, is this e-mail from the dude who wore that HE HATE ME jersey in the XFL and then went back to delivering pizza? Just askin’.
Well, if it really is a load of that, I hope they didn’t have low flow toilet at the home of his father, his step-father, his Muslim school (where he identified himself as a Muslim and studied the Koran), his mosque, and his siblings’ (all of whom are Muslims) homes. That’s a lot of flushing to do and a lot of water wasted in this dire time of global warming.
I wish I could play some theme music for this e-mail. Something like this . . .

Read the full Post


Tags:

January 9, 2008, - 3:24 pm

Who Says There Isn’t Equality in Islam?: Muslim Hag Flushes Hubby Down Toilet

By Debbie Schlussel
Hey, guys, I know it sounds attractive to be a Muslim male. You get to take out your rage in many ways without consequences. You get to have multiple wives and temporary marriages for the purpose of sex (called a muta’a, mostly in Shi’ite Islam). Women have no rights and you can boss them around, beat them with impunity. That’s not to mention honor killings whenever you’re havin’ a bad day. Well, I know that’s not what attracts civilized American guys. It’s only what Gloria Steinem and Hillary Rodham Cankles think American guys want.
But, even given those properties (and property–as in women and infidels) of Islam, apparently it’s not all it’s cracked up to be for Muslim husbands. At least, not in the case of the Muslim woman in Germany, who murdered her husband by flushing him down the toilet, as reported by Expatica and Western Resistance–Religion of Death by Flushing.

islamiccrescent.jpgtoilet.jpg

I don’t think the Global Warming pimpers would like this horrible waste of water, but maybe it was a low-flow toilet:

Housewife Accused of Flushing Husband Down Toilet: Police Believe the Woman Chopped Up the Man and Flushed Repeatedly
Dusseldorf (dpa) – German police are hunting a housewife on murder charges after she allegedly told her children she had flushed their father down the toilet.
The man, a taxi-driver, vanished three weeks ago. Police in the western city of Dusseldorf believe the wife, 52, chopped him up and disposed of 100 kilograms of body parts in garbage bins and down the toilet.
The Muslim couple hated one another. [DS: So, what else is new?!]
After her adult children asked where he was, she replied: “You’ll never find him. I’ve put him down the loo.”
Neighbours said the toilet had been flushed constantly on the night he disappeared.
The woman left Germany and was last seen in her native Macedonia, according to the police.
German police will issue an international warrant for her arrest but are aware that Macedonia does not extradite its own citizens.
Police scientists said the couple’s apartment had been energetically cleaned and repainted, but using disclosing solutions they found bloodstains in the living room, hall and bathroom. Experts are to search the sewer next.
Police voiced amazement that the husband, 58, had never reported her previous attempts to poison him or the time she seriously injured him with a hammer.

Religion of Peace . . . in the Sewer.
Well, if Hillary Rodham Cankles Clinton doesn’t win the Presidency, perhaps this is her plan B for Slick Willie.

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , , , ,

January 9, 2008, - 11:52 am

Michigan Prez Primary Analysis & Predictions: Cankles and McCain (Romney Likely 2nd)

By Debbie Schlussel
I haven’t written a lot about the Presidential primaries in the last couple of weeks or so because I figured–and hoped–you were as tired of hearing about corn-p3wned Iowa caucuses and the Ben & Jerry emigres to New Hampshire (yes, a lot of New Hampshirites are transplanted Vermont hippies) as I was.
But Michigan is another story. As a lifelong (except grad school) Michiganian (I hate the Michigander goose-like description) and two-time candidate for office in the Metro Detroit area (I lost by just one vote), I think I know the ins and outs here and have a little something of note to say on our January 15th primary, next Tuesday.

hillaryclinton.jpgjohnmccain.jpg

michigan2.jpg

Michigan: The Bitch is BAAAAACK. (& The War Hero, Too.)

I predict, on the Democrat side, that Hillary will win Michigan. Well, actually, that’s not a hard prediction, since she’s the only major Democratic candidate on the ballot. The others boycotted our primary in keeping with the Democratic party’s proscription of not making our primary earlier. So, Hillary will win. While there is a too-little, too-late movement by Obama supporters to get people to vote “Uncommitted” in the Democratic Primary, it’s a non-starter. And Hillary will get more than 50% of the Democratic primary vote. Hillary is very popular here, including and especially among older female Black voters. Younger Blacks here tend to favor Obama, but they don’t tend to vote in large numbers.
There is the option for Democratic voters to vote “Uncommitted,” but they are not allowed to write in anyone’s name. Doing so invalidates a primary ballot, which many absentee voters have done (they are being given a second chance to revote, the legality of which I question unless they specifically ask for a new ballot). You have to notify the city clerk which party’s ballot you want. I doubt “Uncommitted” will beat Hillary, but it would be a resounding defeat for her (worse than losing to Obama) if that happened.
But many Dems will be crossing over and voting Republican. And there’s the rub. In 2000, we had a similar scenario. By then, we knew that Gore would be the Democratic nominee. So, Democrats from all over voted in the Republican primary, which you can do in Michigan. As a result, John McCain beat George W. Bush. This time around, though, Dems are urging their crew to vote for Huckabee because they think he’ll be the weakest candidate and the one most easily beaten in November. They’re right about that.
I predict, though, that many Dems will vote for McCain instead of Huckabee. John McCain is popular here in Michigan, including among Democrats (except among Muslims–in 2000, McCain attended the Dearbornistan Arab American Insititute political conference and gutsily told them he supports Israel, continued aid to it, and Jerusalem as it’s undivided capital).
That’s why I think either McCain or Huckabee will win Michigan. And from the campaigning here, I think McCain–not Huckabee–will pull it off. I vote in every single election, including for school board and dog catcher. And the only campaign that’s contacted me–several times by phone–is the McCain campaign. As a likely primary voter, I was invited to, among other things, an airport rally/town hall meeting, this afternoon, with John McCain in my county. Although, I must say, the recording of John McCain did not sound all that enthusiastic and charismatic. (I also got a call from Rasmussen Report pollsters, but I was on the other line and clicked over too late.)
The fact that McCain got the endorsements of both the liberal Detroit Free Press and the Islamist-occupied, semi-liberal Detroit Newsistan means nothing. No-one listens to these papers endorsements. It’s less important than a merit badge for baking cookies in the Girl Scouts.
Romney has been running TV ads the longest, although McCain and Huckabee have begun doing so. But Romney’s ad–he’s been running the same, single ad for weeks–is a bad one. It talks about the Chinese and how soon they will be building cars and airliners. At the very end, Romney claims he will invest in development and research and insist on a level playing field–all glittering generalities without specifics. But you never really notice that part because the majority of the ad sounds like a cheerleading campaign for China.
That’s a big no-no in Michigan, where the dominant manufacturing segment is shrinking faster than a pie on Rosie O’Donnell’s snack-plate. Although the ad is meant to appeal to Reagan Democrat autoworkers who’ve been laid off, it serves more as a source of anger and doesn’t tell us much about what Romney will do.
Huckabee only has one scheduled event in Michigan before the primary, a speech to the Detroit Economic Club, where only elitist Detroiters will see or hear him. They are not rank-and-file Michigan Republican Primary voters. On the other hand, Romney and McCain have several events scheduled almost every single day through Tuesday’s Primary.
Fred Thompson and Rudy Giuliani have no appearances scheduled here and no ads appearing on TV. That’s a mistake. At one time–for a prolonged period of time–Rudy led polls in Michigan. He could have won here. Thompson even led, every so briefly, here.
The punishment on the Republican side for holding our primary early is that the number of Michigan delegates to the Republican National Convention will be cut in half. But by the time of the conventions, I predict neither party will, in fact, punish the state, as they want to win the swing/bellweather state and home to Reagan Democrats in the general election.
Romney can’t afford to lose here because he made that so by constantly billing himself as a Michigan “favorite son,” which he isn’t. Not sure how having a liberal nutjob father who was a self-declared “brainwashed” Governor of Michigan FOUR DECADES AGO makes you a favorite son. We haven’t seen or heard from Mitt Happens until about a year-and-a-half ago. But he’ll lose, and I predict it will be the beginning of the very long drawn out end of his campaign, though he’ll spend far more until he finally drops out.
So, if I had to bet money on it, I’d predict Hillary Rodham Cankles Clinton and John McCain will win Michigan, with Mitt Romney in second place here. That’s my story, and I’m sticking to it.

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

January 8, 2008, - 1:22 pm

Do You Believe Roger Clemens?

By Debbie Schlussel
Did you see Roger Clemens’ interview with Mike Wallace on Sunday Night’s “60 Minutes”? Read/Watch it here.
There are lots of takes on Clemens and his media appearances over the last few days, including this interesting one from Newsday’s Neil Best.
Here’s my take. I watched the “60 Minutes” interview with interest, as I follow sports and have been noting the immediate and delayed reaction to last year’s release of the Mitchell Report on Major League Baseball players’ alleged use of the illicit steroids and human growth hormones. You’ll recall my commentary on this site, just prior to the release of the report.
As you know, Clemens is named in the report. But the “evidence” against him–as with many others “fingered” in the report–comes from one person, Brian McNamee, a personal trainer who dealt in the illegal substances and named names to the feds in exchange for staying out of jail. That’s a case of he said, he said.

rogerclemens.jpgsyringe.jpg

As I watched the Clemens interview with Wallace, I thought he seemed very credible. He didn’t wince or hesitate with his answers, and there was an air of sincerity that enveloped his entire side of the interview. The only part I didn’t believe was when he said he didn’t care about getting into the Hall of Fame. Every pro baseball player dreams of that.
That said, Clemens said he won’t return to baseball. One wonders why not. Is it a case of: without steroids, Clemens can’t have the big years he’s had even of late as a baseball senior citizen? On the other hand, he’s 45–old fogiedom in baseball as in any other big league professional sport.
So did he or didn’t he? I don’t really care because the marketplace has decided it doesn’t care. And in baseball, it is the ultimate arbiter.
Clemens decision to sue the personal trainer who named him, McNamee, is a curious one. It is, at once, clever and stupid.
A defamation suit, as with any other civil suit, subjects both sides to discovery and deposition. Clemens must be that sure there is nothing on him that he is willing to expose himself to deposition. On the other hand, McNamee, fighting off the feds and with a destroyed reputation in Major League Baseball, is probably unemployed and lacking in funds to hire an attorney who will agressively respond to the suit and depose Clemens. Clemens may even win the suit against McNamee in a default judgment.
It’s doubtful the suit will expose anything or clear Clemens’ name with any finality. It will likely be a continuation of he said, he said, if anything.
And the taped telephone conversation Clemens released yesterday is more of that. To me, it doesn’t definitively answer any questions about anything. While Clemens tells McNamee to “tell the truth,” he doesn’t tell him on the tape to “tell them that you know I didn’t use steroids.” And when McNamee says “I’ll go to jail” for Clemens, that implies guilt more than non-guilt for Clemens.
Still, Clemens was very convincing in the Mike Wallace interview.
What do you think? Did Clemens use steroids? Do you care? Or, as I contend, it does not? And do you think the suit and the phone tape are dispositive of anything?

Read the full Post


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,