November 22, 2010, - 3:03 pm
TSA Gropes & Gloves Could Give You STDs
So, now, reports are emerging that TSA screeners aren’t just feeling people up, but actually inserting their hands INSIDE women’s panties and men’s boxers. That’s what happened to an ABC News employee. Beyond the fact that this is disgusting and degrading beyond belief, it’s a health concern. Are you and I gonna end up with somebody else’s crabs, chlamydia, or yeast infection because we dared to fly the post-groping skies? Is it just me . . . or do you wonder whether we can ask TSA molesters to change gloves between “insertions”? Anything less is entirely unsanitary and unsafe. Why the heck are we tolerating this–a First World country devolving into a Third World health clinic without sanitation just ‘cuz you wanna travel by air?
TSA finger-intercourse is a serious concern, and unless they change gloves between these full-contact “feel-you-ups,” they could actually help spread sexually transmitted diseases (soon to be called, “TSA&STDs). I’m not kidding. After all, nail technicians and genital area waxers have more strict requirements regarding sanitized hands and gloves than the TSA screeners do. Subway sandwich artists are required to change gloves.
Perhaps the next stop after the TSA groping is the gynecologist for disinfectant and high-strength antibiotics. Just waiting for the first case of STD-contracted venereal herpes to be the subject of a lawsuit. 3-2-1 . . .
I don’t get it: Islamic hijackers who patronized prostitutes and strippers blew themselves up along with their 3,000 American victims and didn’t live long enough to see their genital warts develop to fruition. Now, we have to contract, via the TSA, the diseases they gave up for the 72 re-virginized?
G-d save this ridiculous country.
Sit Back & Enjoy Big Brother Giving You the Previous Travelers STDs
Tags: airport, gloves, Security, sexually transmitted diseases, STDs, TSA, underpants, underwear
And how about the double standard the news organizations apply to this outrage,when compared to their approach to the news when the Bush administration taking steps to protect citizens against potential attack.
The networks firmly aligned themselves with those who saw the Patriot Act and the electronic surveillance of international phone calls as a dire threat to civil liberties.
The networks were far less interested in the program’s value to disrupting potential terror plots than stressing the hypothetical dangers to Americans’ privacy.
Now we’re told by the Government and the Newsmedia,that we need to give up some liberties in order to be safe.
How convenient
ebayer on November 22, 2010 at 3:57 pm